Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Matematika dan Sains Journal Innovation In Education
Lailatul Anggraini
Unknown Affiliation
Arts Humanities Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementasi Pendekatan TaRL untuk Meningkatkan Hasil Belajar Peserta Didik Mata Pelajaran IPAS Kelas IV di Sekolah Dasar Lailatul Anggraini; Ninik Srijani; Patuh Muhajir
Journal Innovation In Education Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Desember : Journal Innovation in Education (INOVED)
Publisher : STIKes Ibnu Sina Ajibarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59841/inoved.v2i4.1908

Abstract

This research is motivated by the low level of science and science learning which is a problem in educational development, especially at SDN Pilangrejo 02. This research is classroom action research (PTK). The aim of this research is to determine student learning outcomes by implementing the Teaching at the Right Level (TaRL) approach for class IV students on energy transformation material. There were a total of 14 children in the fourth grade that participated in this research project. Nine of the students were female, and five of the students were male. We gathered the data using a combination of observation, recording, and written examinations. Quantitative descriptive analysis was the analytical approach that was used. The findings of the research demonstrated that the use of the TaRL methodology has the potential to enhance the learning outcomes of students in the energy transformation content that is covered in the fourth grade SDN Pilangrejo 02. From the pre-cycle it can be proven that student learning outcomes have only reached 36%, which means 9 out of 14 students did not complete. Then in cycle 1 the percentage became 64%. where 9 students have obtained scores above the KKM. in cycle 2 it increased again to 79% with the number of students who scored above the KKM 11 out of 14 students. This shows that the TaRL approach is effective in improving student learning outcomes in energy transformation material.
Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Bergaya Kognitif Reflektif dalam Pemecahan Masalah Kontekstual Handayani, Ucik Fitri; Mukhtamilatus Sa’diyah; Lailatul Anggraini
JURNAL PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DAN SAINS Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025): JPPMS Vol. 9 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences, Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jppms.v9n2.p53-63

Abstract

There are several mistakes made by students in solving mathematical problems. Students' mistakes are also influenced by cognitive style. The purpose of this study is to describe the mistakes made by students with reflective cognitive styles in solving contextual problems. This study is a descriptive study with a qualitative approach conducted at MA Mambaul Ulum Banjarejo. The material used in this study is linear programming. Data collection was carried out through written tests and interviews with each subject. The instruments used in this study were (1) the MFFT (Matching Familiar Figures Test) cognitive style test, (2) a linear programming problem-solving ability test, and (3) interview guidelines. There were two students with reflective cognitive styles as subjects in this study. The analysis of student errors was based on Newman's Theory. The results of this study are [1] both students with reflective cognitive styles made different mistakes, one student made conceptual errors, namely incorrect determination of inequality signs and transformations, and the other made procedural errors, namely the student was unable to continue working on the problem-solving process and also made mistakes in the transformation stage, process skills, and writing the final answer. [2] Both students with reflective cognitive styles also made the same errors; both made errors in the process skill stage and in the final answer writing stage.
Co-Authors Handayani, Ucik Fitri Mukhtamilatus Sa’diyah Ninik Srijani, Ninik Patuh Muhajir