Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal An-Nur : Jurnal Studi Islam
Dina
Ankara University
Religion Humanities Social Sciences

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Immanuel Kant's Critique of the Ontological Argument: Challenging the Existence of God Dina; Mohammad Muafi Himam
AN NUR: Jurnal Studi Islam Vol. 15 No. 1 (2023): Januari-Juni
Publisher : Institut Ilmu Al-Qur'an (IIQ) An-Nur Yogyakarta Komplek PP An Nur Ngrukem PO BOX 135 Bantul 55702 Yogyakarta Tlp/Fax (0274) 6469012. http://jurnalannur.ac.id/

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37252/annur.v15i1.421

Abstract

This study described Immanuel Kant’s critique of the ontological argument, which he considered weak and flawed in proving the existence of God. Kant had been criticized by many philosophers -the philosophers who defended the ontological argument- as soon as he put forward the critique of the ontological argument. Immanuel Kant argued against the analyticity of "exists" and its status as a real predicate. He criticized ontological arguments, highlighting the distinction between logical and ontological necessity. Kant rejected attempts to derive the existence of a supreme being from concepts, stating that existence transcended conceptual boundaries. While sensory objects could be known through our senses, the existence of pure reason or thought remained unknowable without a priori knowledge. Our awareness of existence pertained to the unity of experience, and any existence beyond it was an unjustifiable illusion. In this study, someone would not disclose the critique of Kant’s critique of ontological argument.
Co-Authors Mohammad Muafi Himam