Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

IMPROVING VOCABULARY MASTERY OF TENTH GRADE STUDENTS THROUGH “BROAD RACES” GAME IN SMK YPKKP CIJERAH BANDUNG Widianingsih, Wiwin; Jubaedah, Dida; Syatroh, Isry Laila
PROJECT (Professional Journal of English Education) Vol 3, No 2 (2020): VOLUME 3 NUMBER 2, MARCH 2020
Publisher : IKIP Siliwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22460/project.v3i2.p237-243

Abstract

This research is aimed at increasing the mastery of English vocabulary at tenth grade in SMK YPKKP Cijerah Bandung. The technique used is the “Broad Races” game. The data were obtained from tests. The low mastery of English vocabulary at tenth grade SMK YPKPP Cijerah Bandung is caused by two factors : 1) low level of understanding of English vocabulary meaning, and 2) students’ difficulty in pronouncing the words. The method used in this research is classroom action research using two cycles. In each cycle there were five meetings. The total meetings were ten meetings; three meetings were for tests, and seven meetings were for treatments. The test result showed that “Broad Races” game is able to improve students’ vocabulary, and facilitate students in memorizing vocabulary. The students’ mean scores have improved. The mean score of pre-test was 4.8, while the mean score of post-test was 7,6. Before the treatment in cycle 1, 8 of 30 students (26%) got the scores above the passing grade (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal-KKM). While  after the treatment in cycle 1, 22 out of 30 students (73%) got the above passing grade (Kriteria Ketuntasan Minimal-KKM). Therefore, it can be suggested that “Broad Races” game can be an alternative way to teach English vocabulary. This result hopefully can give contribution to English teachers to use “Broad Races” game in improving students’ English vocabulary mastery. Keywords:  Broad Races, CAR, English Vocabulary
Efektivitas Arbitrase dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis dan Implementasi Pasal 11 Ayat (2) UU No. 30 Tahun 1999 Natalita, Ferawati; Widianingsih, Wiwin
Public Sphere: Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum Vol 3, No 3 (2024): JPS (Jurnal Sosial Politik, Pemerintahan dan Hukum
Publisher : CV Widina Media Utama

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59818/jps.v3i3.1546

Abstract

This study examines the advantages of arbitration as an alternative dispute resolution mechanism for business disputes compared to conventional litigation. Using a normative juridical approach, it reviews Indonesia’s arbitration framework under Law Number 30 of 1999 and its alignment with international instruments such as the 1958 New York Convention, UNCITRAL, ICSID, and PCA. The analysis focuses on commercial and investment-related disputes. Findings indicate that arbitration offers key benefits—time and cost efficiency, confidentiality, procedural flexibility, and the appointment of expert arbitrators—making it the preferred method internationally. However, implementation in Indonesia remains hindered by inconsistent enforcement of arbitral awards, particularly due to broad public policy interpretations and the exequatur requirement. The study recommends judicial capacity-building, harmonization of legal interpretations, and institutional reforms to ensure Indonesia becomes a genuinely arbitration-friendly jurisdiction.ABSTRAKPenelitian ini menyoroti keunggulan arbitrase sebagai mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa bisnis alternatif dibandingkan proses litigasi konvensional. Dengan pendekatan yuridis normatif, studi ini mengkaji kerangka hukum arbitrase di Indonesia berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 1999 serta keterkaitannya dengan instrumen internasional seperti Konvensi New York 1958, UNCITRAL, ICSID, dan PCA. Fokus kajian meliputi sengketa perdagangan dan investasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa arbitrase menawarkan efisiensi waktu dan biaya, kerahasiaan, fleksibilitas prosedural, serta pemilihan arbiter ahli. Meskipun secara global menjadi metode dominan, pelaksanaan arbitrase di Indonesia masih terkendala, terutama dalam eksekusi putusan karena interpretasi luas terhadap ketertiban umum dan syarat exequatur dari pengadilan. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan kapasitas yudisial, harmonisasi interpretasi hukum, dan reformasi kelembagaan guna menjadikan Indonesia sebagai yurisdiksi yang ramah arbitrase secara normatif dan praktik.