Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hubungan Internasional IKAT : The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Andalas Journal of International Studies Global South Review Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional
Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad, Shofwan Al Banna
Department Of International Relations, Faculty Of Social And Political Sciences, University Of Indonesia
Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Environmental Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Indonesia Dijajah Lebih dari 300 Tahun? Memahami Penjajahan Sebagai Proses Transformasi Struktural Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad
Andalas Journal of International Studies (AJIS) Vol 10, No 1 (2021): Andalas Journal of International Studies, May 2021
Publisher : Department of International Relations, Universitas Andalas

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25077/ajis.10.1.66-82.2021

Abstract

Despite its public popularity, the claim that Indonesia was colonized by the Dutch for more than 300 years is now considered by historians as a historical myth, established as an instrument for nation-building. This article argues that rather than simply judging the claim as myth, we must understand it more comprehensively by employing the framework of International Political Economy, especially the approach which put the entanglements of Capitalism and Colonialism at the center of its analysis. By understanding Colonialism-Imperialism as a process (or a set of processes) of structural transformation, this article contends that the claim that Indonesia had been colonized by the Dutch for more than 300 years has its own merit and must be further explored.
ASEAN in the Age of Anti-Globalization: Compartmentalized Regionalism(s) and Three Trajectories Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad
IKAT: The Indonesian Journal of Southeast Asian Studies Vol 1, No 1 (2017): July
Publisher : Center for Southeast Asian Social Studies (CESASS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (480.305 KB) | DOI: 10.22146/ikat.v1i1.27464

Abstract

This essay attempts to examine the prospect of ASEAN integration in the age of anti-globalization by understanding ASEAN as a compartmentalized regionalism. It argues that discussions on the prospect of ASEAN are actually discussions on the trajectories of two separate regional projects: economic regionalism and political security regionalism. It must be noted that we often have difficulties separating the two because their evolution has so far been marked by centripetal movement towards liberal tradition in the two regional projects. However, since we are entering the age of anti-globalization, this is changing. To make an educated guess on the future of ASEAN regionalism(s), I argue that we should focus our attention to three main indicators: (1) Structural: will the international system be cooperative or competitive multipolar system? (2) National elite orientation: will the liberal elites and technocracy in ASEAN countries remain liberal, or will nationalist elites take charge?; and (3) Public sentiment: how big is the positive or negative sentiment towards economic liberalization?
ASEAN as 'Compartmentalized Regionalism': A Preliminary Discussion Choiruzzad, Shofwan Al Banna
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 19, No. 1
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This article tries to offer a new ontological perspective to scrutinize ASEAN as a form of 'compartmentalized regionalism'. In contrast to the general view of ASEAN diplomatic practitioners and academics who see the history of ASEAN as an evolution of a regional project that in the political and security dimension becomes a multidimensional regional region through 'widening and deepening', the idea of 'compartmental regionalism' replaces the development of ASEAN as the development of two separate regionalism projects in a single entity. Both regionalism projects have different settings, supplemented by different actors, and work based on differing logic. Thus, the development of ASEAN should not be seen merely as 'widening and deepening', but as the development of two different regionalism projects and the complex interaction between the two.
More Democracies, More Peaceful? The Influences of Democratic Peace Theory in Asean’s Democratization Agenda and Possible Challenges Choiruzzad, Shofwan Al Banna
Global: Jurnal Politik Internasional Vol. 15, No. 2
Publisher : UI Scholars Hub

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Counter-Hegemony Front National Prancis terhadap Hegemoni Transnational Capital Class di Eropa Equanjana Fatah Sedono; Shofwan Al Banna Choiruzzad
Jurnal Hubungan Internasional Vol. 15 No. 2 (2022): JURNAL HUBUNGAN INTERNASIONAL
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/jhi.v15i2.36496

Abstract

Integrasi di Eropa merupakan proyek yang dibentuk oleh suatu hegemoni transnasional. Hegemoni ini telah menyebabkan krisis sehingga menimbulkan penolakan dari kelompok sayap kanan seperti Front National di Prancis. Penelitian ini akan menjelaskan terjadinya counter-hegemony dari Front National terhadap hegemoni Transnational Capital Class di Eropa. Tulisan ini akan menggunakan pendekatan Cultural Hegemony Gramscian untuk melihat bagaimana hegemoni yang dibentuk oleh Transnational Capital Class menimbulkan dimensi krisis sehingga mendorong penolakan dari kelompok sayap kanan seperti Front National. European Roundtable for Industry sebagai manifestasi dari Transnational Capital Class memiliki kemampuan untuk mengelola modal transnasional untuk mereproduksi nilai hegemoni walaupun telah terjadi krisis akibat akumulasi modal yang berlebih. Krisis ekonomi di Eropa kemudian menyebabkan berkurangnya dukungan terhadap legitimasi Uni Eropa di Prancis. Dengan menggunakan metode kualitatif deduktif dan pengumpulan data melalui studi literatur, penelitian ini berargumen bahwa terjadinya penolakan dari Front National terhadap hegemoni Transnational Capital Class dan integrasi di Eropa didorong oleh krisis eurozone serta krisis legitimasi Uni Eropa.
Vietnam’s Hedging Strategy in the US–China Trade War: Geo-economic Response During the First Trump Administration Fatharani, Fitri; Choiruzzad, Shofwan Al Banna
Global South Review Vol 7, No 2 (2025): Global South Review
Publisher : Institute of International Studies

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22146/globalsouth.96751

Abstract

The United States–China trade war placed Vietnam in a strategic yet vulnerable position, as a non-involved country that significantly benefited from trade and investment relocation. This situation contributed to Vietnam’s relative capability growth and created new space for asserting its role in regional economic and political structures. This article analyzes Vietnam’s foreign policy strategy in response to the rivalry between two great powers by applying a geo-economic approach and qualitative research methods. The findings reveal that Vietnam adopts a hedging strategy by undertaking active neutrality, contradictory policy—simultaneously accepting and rejecting dominance—and by diversifying its global partnerships to preserve policy autonomy. Vietnam’s hedging reflects both a function of national interest protection and an effort to leverage the opportunity created by relative capability enhancement amidst structural uncertainty. Thus, hedging emerges as a relevant geo-economic instrument for middle states in navigating major power competition while maintaining strategic space and sovereign decision-making.
Co-Authors Equanjana Fatah Sedono Fatharani, Fitri