Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law
Yosia Clementino Moningka
Universitas Tarumanagara
Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PROBLEMATIKA PERLINDUNGAN DAN PEMENUHAN HAK KONSTITUSIONAL MASYARAKAT ADAT Cherry Angella H; Felicia Vanesa Japri; Henna Kurniasih; Maureen Linus; Yosia Clementino Moningka
NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial Vol 10, No 6 (2023): NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/jips.v10i6.2023.2885-2895

Abstract

Indonesia adalah negara yang memiliki sistem hukum sipil, dan kerangka hukumnya didasarkan pada UUD 1945, yang memuat hierarki legislatif tertinggi. Hukum adat adalah peraturan tidak tertulis yang tetap dipatuhi oleh masyarakat karena ada konsekuensi jika melanggarnya. Mayoritas hukum adat tidak tertulis, yang bertentangan dengan asas legalitas, yang berpendapat bahwa hanya boleh ada hukum tertulis untuk memberikan kepastian hukum. Adanya pluralitas hukum yang harus diperhatikan selain hukum positif dalam masyarakat Indonesia ditunjukkan dengan adanya sistem hukum adat sebagai addendum hukum positif di Indonesia.
The Position of the Tax Court in the Indonesian Judicial System After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 26/PUU-XXI/2023 Yosia Clementino Moningka; Rasji Rasji
Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Yayasan Adra Karima Hubbi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55849/rjl.v1i1.318

Abstract

Background. The Tax Court, basically, has been regulated in Law Number 14 Year 2002 on Tax Court. However, there is an issue relating to the ambiguous position of the Tax Court. Purpose. The purpose of this is to show that the position of the court is not independent, as it plays a role in both judicial and executive functions, which may result in a lack of independence in case decision making. Therefore, this study aims to determine the position of the tax court in the current judicial system in Indonesia. Method. This research uses normative juridical research method by reviewing secondary data obtained. Based on the results of the research, it was found that the latest Constitutional Court Decision Number 26/PUU-XXI/2023 has determined that the Tax Courts must transfer their organizational, administrative, and financial development responsibilities to the Supreme Court before 31 December 2026. Results. The consequence of this decision is that the organizational structure of the Tax Court will be directly under the supervision of the Supreme Court and no longer under the Ministry of Finance. Although the Tax Court will be transferred to the Supreme Court, it is important to maintain this situation as the transition requires adjustments in terms of organizational structure, employee status, and career opportunities for tax judges. All of these matters must be studied and solutions found by the Tax Court as the independence of tax judges means a lot to taxpayers seeking justice in their tax disputes. Conclusion. In addition to independence, the public also expects competent expertise and knowledge from tax judges as enforcers of justice in tax disputes.
Co-Authors Cherry Angella H Felicia Vanesa Japri Henna Kurniasih Maureen Linus Rasji