Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 13 Documents
Search

TELAAH TERHADAP PENGATURAN CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY (CSR) BERBASIS MANDATORY DI NEGARA MAURITIUS Yunari, Sri Bakti; Nurannisa, Gisca; Wijihastuti, Sri; Winanti, Atik; Ariscky, Taufan Andre; Kosmanto, Yashinta
Jurnal Yuridis Vol 11 No 2 (2024): Jurnal Yuridis
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35586/jyur.v11i2.9599

Abstract

Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengkaji pengaturan Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) sebagai kewajiban hukum di negara Republik Mauritius, Afrika Timur, sebagai fenomena yang terus berkembang pada konsep CSR berbasis mandatory baik yang terjadi di negara barat, negara kawasan asia bahkan negara di wilayah Afrika. Dengan mengunakan metode penelitian hukum, bersumber pada bahan hukum sekunder, dan dianalisis secara preskriptif dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute approach), maka diperoleh kajian bahwa Mauritius sebagai negara Republik di wilayah Afrika Timur telah mengatur CSR sebagai mandatory secara tegas didalam Income Tax Act 1995 yang dikonsolidasikan kedalam Finance Act 2009, sebagaimana telah dirubah oleh Finance Act 2023 dan telah diintegrasikan dalam satu dokumen terkonsolidasi oleh Mauritius Revenue Authority (MRA) atau Income Tax Authorithy (ITA) Mauritius. Dimana awal keberadaan CSR di Mauritius lebih didasarkan pada komitmen pemerintah Mauritius untuk memerangi kemiskinan dan bertujuan untuk mempromosikan pembangunan yang berkelanjutan. Secara normatif pengaturan CSR di Mauritius diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan masukan bagi pembahasan Rancangan Undang Undang Tanggung Jawab Sosial Perusahaan (RUU-TJSP) yang saat ini masuk dalam Program legislasi nasional Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia Tahun 2019-2024
PERBANDINGAN PENGATURAN MEREK DAN INDIKASI GEOGRAFIS BATIK BETAWI DI INDONESIA DAN BATIK KELANTAN DI MALAYSIA Carmiya, Carmiya; Yunari, Sri Bakti
Tribuere Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/

Abstract

Geographical Indication Protection is growing rapidly, especially in Asia. ASEAN countries are active in identifying and registering Geographical Indications to increase the presence of national and international markets. One of the developments in the protection of Geographical Indications is Betawi Batik and Kelantan Batik. The main issue is regarding the similarities and differences in the regulation of the geographical indication of Betawi batik in Indonesia and Kelantan batik in Malaysia. And legal protection for the geographical indication of Betawi batik in Indonesia and Kelantan batik in Malaysia. This thesis uses a normative type with a comparative legal research method. The research data uses secondary data and primary data, drawing conclusions using a deductive method by analyzing qualitatively. This thesis can be concluded regarding the similarities in the regulation of IG Betawi batik and Kelantan batik referring to the legal rules of Geographical Indications in Indonesia and Malaysia by implementing a mandatory IG registration system by identifying goods/products originating from their respective geographical areas. While the differences in IG Betawi batik in Indonesia are regulated by Law No. 20/2016 MIG. Kelantan Batik in Malaysia is regulated by the Geographical Indications Act 2022. The registration process for Geographical Indications in Indonesia is through DJKI, while IG in Malaysia is through MyIPO. In law enforcement in Indonesia, if a violation occurs, it can be through the courts, in Malaysia through a special institution and/or by imposing administrative sanctions. The requirements for obtaining IG legal protection are by submitting an application to the government. The term of protection for Geographical Indications for Betawi batik in Indonesia is as long as the reputation, quality, and characteristics are maintained, while the IG for Kelantan batik in Malaysia is for 10 years and can be extended.
KEDUDUKAN HUKUM PURCHASE ORDER DALAM PERJANJIAN JUAL BELI MATERIAL ANTARA PT. PEMBANGUNAN PERUMAHAN (Persero), Tbk. dan TRIPUTRA KARYA UTAMA Sinaga, Paulus Welly Andalanta; Yunari, Sri Bakti
Tribuere Vol. 2 No. 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/

Abstract

 In general, companies conduct buying and selling transactions using a purchase order as proof of ordering or purchasing. This purchase order document contains terms and conditions governing the sale and purchase conducted, without any preceding agreement. The legal position of a purchase order in a material sale and purchase agreement refers to contract law in accordance with Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code (KUH Perdata). In the following case, involving PT. Pembangunan Perumahan (Persero), Tbk. and PT. Triputra Karya Utama, the payment for the sale and purchase was not made in accordance with the terms stated in the purchase order, and there was no underlying agreement preceding it. The issue at hand is how the legal standing of a purchase order in an agreement can be considered a valid contract under contract law, according to the provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code. Additionally, what legal remedies can PT. Triputra Karya Utama and PT. Pembangunan Perumahan (Persero) take in the event of a breach of contract? The type of research used is normative legal research, which is descriptive in nature. This study utilizes secondary data, primarily legal sources, obtained through literature studies and interviews. Data processing is carried out qualitatively, and conclusions are drawn deductively. Based on juridical analysis, the legal standing of a purchase order as an agreement fulfills the validity requirements of a contract under contract law and can be considered a valid agreement according to Article 1320 of the Indonesian Civil Code. Therefore, the material purchase order created by the parties, PT. Pembangunan Perumahan (Persero), Tbk. and PT. Triputra Karya Utama, constitutes a legally binding agreement that imposes rights and obligations on both parties. In the event of a breach of contract concerning the purchase order, the aggrieved party may demand performance of the contract or seek cancellation along with compensation, in accordance with Article 1267 of the Indonesian Civil Code.