Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Indonesian Exegetists and Multiculturalism: Study about Hamka and Muhammad Quraish Shihabs Idea on Multiculturalism Syaik Abdillah; Ris’an Rusli
Islam Transformatif : Journal of Islamic Studies Vol. 7 No. 2 (2023): July-December 2023
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Sjech M. Djamil Djambek Bukittinggi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30983/it.v7i2.7341

Abstract

Abstract This article aims to discuss the idea of multiculturalism from the views of two Indonesian figures, Hamka and Quraish Shihab. Dawam Rahardjo (2010) argues that the principle of multiculturalism in Indonesia has not been properly understood because it is littered with mutual suspicion and concern, especially among majority and minority groups. In real terms, the idea of multiculturalism has not been received by Muslims in general. Firmly, the MUI and Kisdi (Indonesian Committee for Islamic World Solidarity) reject pluralism (2005); Multiculturalism as a pluralistic perspective is not only about recognizing and respecting the plurality of realities but also paying attention to aspects of interaction and the existence of each culture as equal entities. Based on the author's observations, the Qur'an contains many verses that can be used as a basis for building cooperation, mutual respect, tolerance and appreciation, a willingness to accept diversity, reconciliation between people, and peaceful coexistence between cultural groups, based on the principle of justice and equality,  and others multiculturalism principles. The methods used in this article are the content analysis method and the comparative method. Furthermore, this research uses historical and sociological approaches. Artikel ini bertujuan untuk membahas tentang gagasan multikulturalisme dari pandangan dua tokoh Indonesia, yaitu Hamka dan Quraish Shihab.  Dawam Rahardjo (2010), melihat bahwa prinsip multikulturalisme di Indonesia belum dipahami secara benar, karena dikotori oleh sikap saling curiga dan kekhawatiran, terutama kelompok mayoritas dan minoritas. Secara riel, gagasan tentang multikulturalisme belum mendapat penerimaan yang memadai dari umat Islam pada umumnya. Secara tegas, MUI dan Kisdi (Komite Indonesia untuk Solidaritas Dunia Islam) menolak paham pluralisme (2005); Multikulturalisme sebagai cara pandang kemajemukan bukan hanya sekedar mengakui dan menghormati kemajemukan realitas, tapi juga  memperhatikan aspek interaksi dan keberadaan setiap kebudayaan  sebagai entitas yang setara dan memiliki hak yang setara pula di tengah masyarakat. Berdasarkan pengamatan penulis, Al-Qur'an banyak memuat ayat yang bisa dijadikan asas untuk membangun kerjasama, saling menghormati, toleransi dan penghargaan, kesediaan untuk menerima keragaman, rekonsilidasi antarmanusia, dan hidup berdampingan secara damai antarkelompok budaya, berdasarkan prinsip keadilan, kesetaraan, dan prinsip multikulturalisme lainnya. Metode yang akan digunakan dalam penyusunan artikel ini adalah metode analisis isi (content analysis)dan metode komparatif. Lebih lanjut, penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan historis dan sosiologis.
Pandangan Ulama Muhammadiyah dan Ulama Nahdlatul Ulama Kabupaten Garut Tentang Justtifikasi Riba di Perbankan Syaik Abdillah; Ai Nurmayanti
Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : STAI Al Musaddadiyah Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37968/jhesy.v5i1.1143

Abstract

Differences of opinion regarding the legality of bank interest in Islam have become a significant issue in the modern economic system, particularly in conventional banking practices. From the Islamic perspective, bank interest is often associated with riba, which is explicitly prohibited in the Qur’an. However, amid differing interpretations, various justifications have emerged among scholars. This study aims to examine the views of Muhammadiyah and Nahdlatul Ulama (NU) scholars in Garut Regency concerning the justification of riba in conventional banking transactions. This research employs a qualitative method with a literature study approach and in-depth interviews with scholars from both organizations. Data were obtained through documentation and direct interviews with Muhammadiyah and NU figures in Garut. The findings reveal both similarities and differences in the perspectives of the two groups of scholars. Both agree that bank interest in private banking is categorized as riba and thus prohibited (haram). However, regarding state-owned banks, Muhammadiyah scholars tend to classify it as syubhat (doubtful), while NU scholars consider it permissible (halal) since the profits are redirected for the benefit of the community. This study highlights the importance of understanding scholarly differences in examining Islamic economic law and underscores the urgency of dialogue between scholars and banking practitioners in formulating solutions that align with Sharia principles. Keywords: Riba; Conventional Banking; Muhammadiyah; Nahdlatul Ulama; Justification
Tinjauan Hukum Islam Tentang Pengalihan Barang Gadai Tanpa Sepengetahuan Pemiliknya Syaik Abdillah; Imam Mudin Hasbuloh
Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah Vol 5 No 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi Syariah
Publisher : STAI Al Musaddadiyah Garut

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37968/jhesy.v5i1.1626

Abstract

Pawn transactions are a form of contract in muamalah intended to provide debt security. However, in practice, deviations often occur, one of which is the transfer of pawned goods without the owner’s consent. This phenomenon is quite common in Karangtengah Village, Kadungora Sub-district, Garut Regency, where pawned goods such as motorcycles are transferred by the pawnee (murtahin) to third parties without the approval of the pledger (rahin). The main research problems are how Islamic law regulates pawn rights and the protection of the owner, how the transfer is practiced in the local community, and how Islamic law views such practices. The purpose of this study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the legal status of pawn transfers according to sharia, while assessing their implications for justice and trust in transactions. This research employs a qualitative descriptive method, using interviews with local residents and related documentation. The findings reveal that unauthorized transfers violate sharia principles, including the rule of ghasab (unlawful appropriation), and reflect the community’s weak legal awareness. In conclusion, this practice is invalid under Islamic law. Therefore, legal education, greater community awareness, and the implementation of written contracts are needed to uphold justice and trust in pawn transactions. Keywords: Pawn; Transfer; Islamic Law; Trust; Ghasab.