Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an
Amin Songgirin
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Humanities Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TAFSĪR AL-QURAN DENGAN AL-QURAN Amin Songgirin
Al Burhan: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur'an Vol. 21 No. 1 (2021): Al Burhan: Kajian Ilmu dan Pengembangan Budaya Al-Qur’an
Publisher : LP2M Universitas PTIQ Jakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (67.85 KB) | DOI: 10.53828/nm3x6184

Abstract

This paper describes the interpretation of the Koran with the Koran which is the earliest method of interpretation to emerge and develop. The interpretation of the Qur'an with the Qur'an is one type of interpretation bi al-ma'thūr which includes the interpretation and the interpreter. This type of interpretation is not filled with falsehood, because the source is directly from Allah SWT. The method used in this paper is descriptive analytic method. The interpretation of the Qur'an with the Qur'an uses several methods; Mujmal and Mubayyan (al-Ijmāl wa al-Bayān); Al-Muṭlaq and al-Muqayyad; Takhṣīṣ al'-Ām; Al-Bayān bil-Manṭūq aw bil-Mafhūm; Tafsr Lafzi bi-Lafzi; Tafsr Ma'nā with Ma'nā; Tafsr Uslūb fī yatin bi Uslbi fī yatin al-Ukhrā; Tabyīn al-Mūjaz bil-Mufaṣal; Al-jam'u Baina mā Yatawahhama Annahu Mukhtalif.
Disharmony of the Principle of Marital Integrity in Divorce Application Decision Number 3701/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS. Analysis of Legal Formality and Sociological Reality Nur Sa’adah; Amin Songgirin; Slamet Riyady
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.20306261

Abstract

This study analyzes the disharmony between the principle of marital integrity as a legal norm and the sociological reality reflected in Divorce Petition Number 3701/Pdt.G/2024/PA.JS, particularly regarding the emergence of polyandry in the parties’ marital conflict. In Islamic family law and Indonesian positive law, the principle of marital integrity places divorce as a last resort to preserve family stability; however, judicial practice demonstrates that when the substantive objectives of marriage are no longer achieved, maintaining a formal marital relationship may instead create injustice. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by qualitative analysis through legal and socio-legal interpretation of the judge’s considerations. The findings show that the judge interpreted the principle of marital integrity not textually but functionally, as an evaluative instrument to assess the sustainability of the marriage’s objectives. In this case, polyandry was viewed not only as a violation of legal norms but also as evidence of the breakdown of marital relations caused by prolonged conflict. The judge’s reasoning reflects a shift in ratio decidendi from a legalistic approach toward a socio-juridical perspective that considers psychological, social, and welfare aspects of the parties. Accordingly, the divorce decision was understood as a means of protecting individual dignity and well-being in line with the principle of legal benefit and the paradigm of maqāṣ id al-sharī‘ah. The novelty of this study lies in reconstructing the principle of marital integrity as a relational and conditional principle rather than an absolute one, thereby demonstrating that the tension between legal formality and sociological reality provides interpretative space for judges to balance legal certainty, substantive justice, and social benefit within the development of Islamic family law in Indonesia.
Co-Authors Nur Sa’adah Slamet Riyady