Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.503
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Journal Equity of Law and Governance i-Latinnotary Journal: Internasional Journal of Latin Notary International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities (IJMESH) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies)
Aslan Noor
Universitas Pasundan
Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 8 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 8 Documents
Search

 1 
Kepastian Hukum Bagi Debitur Atas Kelalaian Kreditur Dalam Pelaksanaan Roya Jaminan Hak Tanggungan Aslan Noor; Agnes Adila Kurnia; Hertanto Wijaya; Yoga Fadhilah; Yusuf Thayeb
Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Vol. 3 No. 4 (2023): Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research
Publisher : Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/innovative.v3i4.4227

Abstract

Pelaksanaan Roya terhadap sebagian objek Hak Tanggungan dengan tanpa diperjanjikan terlebih dahulu didasarkan pada Pasal 124 ayat (2) PMA Nomor 3 Tahun 1997, sedangkan dalam Pasal 2 ayat (1) dan ayat (2) UUHT, disebutkan apabila menghendaki adanya Roya harus disebutkan terlebih dahulu dalam APHT. Adanya dua ketentuan berbeda ini membuat masyarkat dalam hal ini notaris, pemberi Hak Tanggungan, penerima Hak Tanggungan, dan BPN menjadi bingung dan juga dapat membuat celah dalam perbuatan hukum dalam pelaksanaan Roya. Pengaturan mengenai hak tanggungan dan kewajiban kreditur dan debitur terkait dengannya diatur dalam UUHT dan PMA Pendaftaran Tanah di Indonesia. UUHT mengatur tentang pendirian, perubahan, dan penghapusan hak tanggungan, serta hak dan kewajiban kreditur dan debitur terkait hal ini. Perbedaan antara pengaturan Roya antara UUHT dengan PMA Pendaftaran Tanah menjadikan pelaksanaan Roya ataupun ketentuan penyebutan Roya dalam APHT menjadi tidak pasti dan hal ini memeberikan perlindungan hukum dalam pelaksanaan Roya tersebut. Setelah hutang dilunasi sepenuhnya, kreditur memiliki kewajiban hukum untuk melakukan penghapusan hak tanggungan tersebut. Apabila kreditur tidak melakukan penghapusan hak tanggungan setelah hutang dilunasi, debitur memiliki hak untuk meminta penghapusan dan dapat mengajukan gugatan.
The Legal Status Of Land Tenure Of Foreign Nationals Obtained Through Public Auction On The Object Of Mortgage Rights Patriana Purwa; Geta Ilham Adi Prasetyo; Budi Salman Farizy; Mariam Pratama; Aslan Noor
International Journal of Latin Notary Vol. 3 No. 02 (2023): Internasional Journal of Latin Notary, March 2023
Publisher : Magister Kenotariatan Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55904/journal.v3i02.55

Abstract

The concept of citizenship stipulates that non-citizens are prohibited from acquiring land ownership in Indonesia, meaning that "only Indonesian citizens are eligible for land ownership rights in Indonesia." This regulation is outlined in Article 21 and Article 26, paragraph (2) of the UUPA. If a foreign national is unable to own land, they are granted land tenure status through auctions, entailing rights of usage or other entitlements. This situation can potentially lead to issues of legal ambiguity and inconsistencies in the regulations governing property rights for foreign nationals who acquire land through auctioned mortgage rights. The primary concern addressed by the author is to determine the status of the auction minutes document as proof of land rights transfer to foreign nationals and the legal status of land rights control held by foreign nationals who obtain property through mortgage rights auctions. The objective of this study is to investigate and analyze the validity of the auction minutes document as evidence of land rights transfer to foreigners and to analyze the legal status of land rights held by foreign nationals who acquire property through mortgage rights auctions. The research employs a normative juridical research method, specifically a normative legal research approach. This approach encompasses both a statutory analysis and a conceptual analysis. Based on the findings of this research: 1. The auction minutes' position as evidence of the transfer of land ownership rights to foreign nationals indicates that these minutes, prepared by the auctioneer, can serve as a valid basis for documenting the transfer of rights to foreign nationals. 2. Regarding the legal status of land ownership obtained by foreign nationals through mortgage rights auctions, it is established that such land ownership is legally valid. Foreign nationals can manage this land under usage rights status, with the utilization rights in the name of foreign nationals being subject to the prescribed rights transfer procedures.
Legal Status of Land Rights Certificates due to Neglect by Rights Holders and Decades of Occupation: A Normative Legal Study Aslan Noor; Avif Prasetyo; Rais Rahmat Nugraha; Siti Nurhasanah; Celeste M. Navarro
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v24i2.6982

Abstract

This study analyses the legal status of land title certificates when their holders neglect the land, allowing it to be occupied by the community for decades. Based on a normative legal approach, this study examines primary legal materials (laws and regulations and court decisions) and secondary materials (scientific literature) to examine the relationship between legal certainty, the social function of land, and administrative corrective mechanisms. The results show that certificates are strong evidence but not absolute because their validity is conditional on the accuracy of physical-legal data and the holder's compliance with social functions. Neglect (land not used/utilised/maintained) opens up the possibility of land being declared abandoned and rights revoked through administrative procedures, while long-term occupation by the community gives rise to the need for normative-factual assessments that balance formal certainty and substantive justice. This study identifies misunderstandings about the certainty of certificates as triggers for abandonment and escalation of disputes when rights holders seek to restore physical control. It recommends prevention based on utilisation plans, boundary and data validation (title validation), collaborative mapping, and transparent and standardised administrative enforcement. Policy implications emphasise education on social functions, modernisation of land administration, and compensation/guarantee mechanisms that maintain public trust without neglecting rights protection. The findings enrich the land reform discourse with an operational testing framework.
Analysis Of The Validity Of Underhand Exchange Agreements (Study Of Court Decision Number 21/PDT.G/2020/PN BLK) Ayu Ambarwati; Mega Yuni Hospita; Pucuk Nyimas Sekar A.S; Aslan Noor
Journal Equity of Law and Governance Vol. 5 No. 2
Publisher : Warmadewa Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/elg.5.2.10456.163-168

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the validity of the underhand exchange agreement based on a case study of court decision number 21/Pdt.G/2020/PN BLK. The method used in this study is qualitative with a juridical-normative approach. Data were obtained through in-depth interviews with legal experts and practitioners, as well as document studies of court decisions and relevant legal literature. The analysis was carried out using content analysis and juridical analysis techniques to identify and assess the legal aspects of the underhand exchange agreement and its application in court decisions.The results of the study indicate that the validity of the underhand exchange agreement is greatly influenced by the fulfillment of the requirements for the validity of the agreement according to civil law in Indonesia. The court decision in this case underlines the importance of the elements of agreement and good faith between the parties in ensuring the validity of the agreement. This study also found that although underhand agreements are often considered more vulnerable to legal disputes, court decisions provide important guidance on how such agreements can be legally recognized and enforced.This research contributes to the development of contract law theory, particularly regarding underhand agreements, and provides recommendations for legal practitioners in drafting and handling legally valid exchange agreements.
Analysis of Appointment Agreements in the Context of Illegal Land Transfers to Foreign Nationals Aslan Noor; Adinda Amalia Putri; Tubagus Langlang Buana; Tuti Zulaeha; Jefri Situmorang; Dafina Nurulita Suherman; Rizki Daffa A
International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): July - December Issue
Publisher : Research Synergy Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31098/ijmesh.v9i2.3692

Abstract

The issue of nominee agreements in Indonesia poses challenges in balancing the promotion of foreign investment with the protection of land sovereignty. Despite strict legal prohibitions, this practice continues to flourish and creates uncertainty in legal doctrine and agrarian governance. This study aims to analyse the legal status of nominee agreements under Indonesian positive law, particularly in the context of Law No. 25 of 2007 on Investment (UUPM), and to evaluate the legal consequences of land ownership by foreign investors through this mechanism. This study uses a normative juridical approach, referring to primary legal sources such as the UUPM, the 1960 Basic Agrarian Law (UUPA), and the 2007 Limited Liability Company Law (UUPT), as well as secondary and tertiary literature. The results of the study show that nominee agreements are prohibited in the context of corporations based on the UUPM and UUPT, and are therefore null and void from the outset. However, the absence of specific regulations on land ownership creates a legal vacuum that allows this practice to continue. Nominee agreements fulfil the subjective elements of an agreement but fail to fulfil the legal causes according to the Civil Code, making them legally invalid but still operating in practice. This poses legal and social risks for foreign investors and local nominees and has an impact on agrarian justice and the credibility of the national investment system. This study emphasises the importance of regulatory harmonisation and consistent law enforcement to strengthen legal certainty and maintain state sovereignty over land in accordance with Indonesia's constitutional mandate.
The Impact of Land Mafia on Agrarian Disputes and the Optimisation of Electronic Land Transfer Deeds in Indonesia Aslan Noor; Suci Rahmawati; Tara Devilia Hidayati; Rina Rosmiati; Muhammad Reifal adenafio; Ahmad Yusuf Nurwanda; Arief Satriawan
International Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship, Social Science and Humanities Vol. 9 No. 1 (2025): July - December Issue
Publisher : Research Synergy Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31098/ijmesh.v9i2.3693

Abstract

This study investigates the impact of land mafia practices on land conflicts and disputes in Indonesia and evaluates the potential of electronic land administration policies to enhance legal certainty. Land remains one of the nation’s most strategic resources, yet its governance has been undermined by systemic irregularities and organized criminal practices. Land mafia activities ranging from document forgery and duplicate certificates to collusion with state officials have generated prolonged disputes, eroded public trust in the legal system, and hindered investment in the property and infrastructure sectors. The research employs a normative legal method, focusing on statutory analysis and doctrinal review to identify principles, norms, and legal frameworks relevant to the problem. Primary legal sources include national agrarian legislation and Ministerial Regulation ATR/BPN No. 3 of 2023, while secondary and tertiary sources encompass scholarly literature, journal articles, and legal reference materials. This conceptual approach allows for a systematic evaluation of both the challenges posed by land mafia practices and the opportunities offered by digital transformation in land governance. The findings indicate that land mafia practices cause significant legal uncertainty, particularly through falsified and duplicate certificates, which create conflicting ownership claims and protracted litigation. Such conditions not only harm individual landholders but also weaken the national economy by discouraging investment. In response, the government’s introduction of electronic land certificates provides a promising reform, offering enhanced transparency, security, and efficiency in land administration. Nevertheless, challenges remain, including resistance from vested interests, cybersecurity risks, and unequal access to digital platforms. The study concludes that combating land mafia practices requires a comprehensive approach that integrates technological innovation with institutional strengthening, professional accountability, and community participation. The contribution of this research lies in highlighting the normative and policy dimensions of land governance reform, while also identifying critical areas for further interdisciplinary and empirical investigation. By addressing these issues, the study advances the discourse on sustainable, transparent, and equitable land governance in Indonesia.
Legal Certainty of Complete Systematic Land Registration in Resolving Overlapping Ownership Rights Disputes Aslan Noor; Yayat; Nur Shofa Hanafiah; Ali Husen Al Ansori; Joan Valeria Karina Ongkor
JHSS (JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES AND SOCIAL STUDIES) Vol. 10 No. 03 (2026): JHSS (Journal of Humanities and Social Studies)
Publisher : UNIVERSITAS PAKUAN

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33751/jhss.v10i03.246

Abstract

. Complete Systematic Land Registration, known as Pendaftaran Tanah Sistematis Lengkap (PTSL), constitutes a strategic government policy intended to accelerate the registration of all land parcels and provide legal certainty and protection for land right holders. Nevertheless, its implementation may still give rise to overlapping-certificate disputes when the collection, examination, mapping, and integration of physical and juridical data are not conducted accurately. This study aims to identify the factors causing overlapping certificates in the implementation of PTSL, analyse their juridical implications for the evidentiary strength of land certificates, and formulate a dispute-resolution mechanism capable of achieving substantive legal certainty in land administration. This study employs normative legal research using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches and adopts a descriptive-analytical design. Secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials were collected through library research. Limited observations and interviews conducted at the Bandung Land Office were used as supporting data to contextualise the implementation of legal norms in practice. The data were analysed through qualitative juridical analysis using grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretation. The findings demonstrate that overlapping certificates in PTSL are caused by inaccurate physical data, inadequate examination of the history of rights acquisition, incomplete integration of older certificates into the cadastral mapping system, ineffective application of the contradictio delimitatio principle, limited effectiveness of public data announcements, and weak administrative coordination and quality control. A land certificate constitutes strong but not absolute evidence and may be annulled when its issuance is proven to contain an administrative or juridical defect. In principle, the certificate issued earlier has a stronger evidentiary position, provided that it was lawfully issued, remains valid, refers to the same physical object, and was acquired in good faith. Overlapping-certificate disputes should be resolved progressively through verification of physical and juridical data, field re-surveying, cadastral overlay mapping, mediation, administrative correction or annulment, and proceedings before the District Court or State Administrative Court according to the legal character of the dispute. Strengthening data validation, integrating historical land records, and implementing quality control at every stage of PTSL are essential prerequisites for achieving substantive legal certainty in land administration.
Examining Land Rights Expropriation Policies for Public Interest: A Social Justice Perspective in Indonesia Aslan Noor; Dian Alamsyah; Mohammad Faridz Fathurrohman
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v5i2.1976

Abstract

The policy of land acquisition for public purposes is an important instrument for supporting national development. Yet in practice, it often generates agrarian conflicts and raises concerns about justice for affected communities. The central issue lies in the gap between the normative objectives of land acquisition policies and their implementation, particularly in ensuring the protection of citizens' rights and the realization of social justice. This study addresses the following research question: How is the implementation of land acquisition policies for public interest evaluated from a social justice perspective? Using a normative legal research method, this study analyses relevant legislation, court decisions, and recent academic literature through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings reveal that land acquisition practices remain dominated by administrative and legal-formal orientations, which limit the achievement of substantive justice. Community participation is often procedural rather than meaningful, compensation mechanisms largely emphasize economic valuation, and restorative measures to support post-displacement recovery are insufficiently integrated. The study concludes that land acquisition policies must be reoriented toward a more participatory, equitable, and restorative framework to strengthen policy legitimacy and better safeguard community rights throughout the development process.
Co-Authors Adinda Amalia Putri Agnes Adila Kurnia Ahmad Yusuf Nurwanda Ali Husen Al Ansori Arief Satriawan Avif Prasetyo Ayu Ambarwati Budi Salman Farizy Celeste M. Navarro Dafina Nurulita Suherman Dian Alamsyah Geta Ilham Adi Prasetyo Hertanto Wijaya Jefri Situmorang Joan Valeria Karina Ongkor Mariam Pratama Mega Yuni Hospita Mohammad Faridz Fathurrohman Muhammad Reifal adenafio Nur Shofa Hanafiah Patriana Purwa Pucuk Nyimas Sekar A.S Rais Rahmat Nugraha Rina Rosmiati Rizki Daffa A Siti Nurhasanah Suci Rahmawati Tara Devilia Hidayati Tubagus Langlang Buana Tuti Zulaeha Yayat Yoga Fadhilah Yusuf Thayeb