Muh Hendri Nuryadi, Muh Hendri
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : PKn Progresif

IDENTIFIKASI KESULITAN PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL TES URAIAN OBYEKTIF PADA MATA PELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DAN KEWARGANEGARAAN (STUDI KASUS DI SMA BATIK 2 SURAKARTA) Nuryadi, Muh Hendri; ., Winarno
PKn Progresif Vol 11, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : PKn Progresif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.727 KB)

Abstract

The objectives of research was to find out: 1) how the analysis of objective essay test item organized by Pancasila and Civic Education teacher is in SMA Batik 2 Surakarta, and 2) the factors causing the student?s difficulty in solving the objective essay test item in Pancasila and Civic Education subject in SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. This study was a qualitative research approach. Data source derived from informant, place, event, and document. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. Techniques of collecting data used were interview, observation, document analysis and Focus Group Discussion. Data validation was carried out using data and method triangulations. The results of research are as follows: 1) The analysis on objective essay test item organized by teacher included: a) in material aspect, the border of question and answer to be measured in essay test had not showed clear border yet, b) in constructing aspect, the essay test developed by teacher still had weaknesses such as no clear instruction on how to work on the intended test item, c) in language aspect, essay item developed by teacher had not used simple language, meaning that there was still too-long sentence less understandable to the students. 2) The factors causing the students? difficulty in solving the essay test included: Internal factor: a) in cognitive aspect: low cognitive ability of students, b) in affective aspect: some students still did not care with the learning, slept in the classroom, were preoccupied with themselves, and did not pay attention to teacher during the learning process, c) in psychomotor aspect: less active participation of students in discussion learning. External factor: a) Infrastructure factor: inadequate learning source availability facilitated by school for the students in the form of Student Worksheet (LKS) or other exercise book. b) Teacher factor: Pancasila and Civic Education teacher?s limited intensity in applying the assessment in the form essay question.
IDENTIFIKASI KESULITAN PESERTA DIDIK DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SOAL TES URAIAN OBYEKTIF PADA MATA PELAJARAN PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DAN KEWARGANEGARAAN (STUDI KASUS DI SMA BATIK 2 SURAKARTA) Saputra, Galih; ., Winarno; Nuryadi, Muh Hendri
PKn Progresif Vol 11, No 1 (2016)
Publisher : PKn Progresif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (187.727 KB)

Abstract

The objectives of research was to find out: 1) how the analysis of objective essay test item organized by Pancasila and Civic Education teacher is in SMA Batik 2 Surakarta, and 2) the factors causing the student?s difficulty in solving the objective essay test item in Pancasila and Civic Education subject in SMA Batik 2 Surakarta. This study was a qualitative research approach. Data source derived from informant, place, event, and document. The sampling technique used was purposive sampling. Techniques of collecting data used were interview, observation, document analysis and Focus Group Discussion. Data validation was carried out using data and method triangulations. The results of research are as follows: 1) The analysis on objective essay test item organized by teacher included: a) in material aspect, the border of question and answer to be measured in essay test had not showed clear border yet, b) in constructing aspect, the essay test developed by teacher still had weaknesses such as no clear instruction on how to work on the intended test item, c) in language aspect, essay item developed by teacher had not used simple language, meaning that there was still too-long sentence less understandable to the students. 2) The factors causing the students? difficulty in solving the essay test included: Internal factor: a) in cognitive aspect: low cognitive ability of students, b) in affective aspect: some students still did not care with the learning, slept in the classroom, were preoccupied with themselves, and did not pay attention to teacher during the learning process, c) in psychomotor aspect: less active participation of students in discussion learning. External factor: a) Infrastructure factor: inadequate learning source availability facilitated by school for the students in the form of Student Worksheet (LKS) or other exercise book. b) Teacher factor: Pancasila and Civic Education teacher?s limited intensity in applying the assessment in the form essay question.
STUDI EVALUASI TENTANG KOMPETENSI PEDAGOGIK GURU PENDIDIKAN PANCASILA DAN KEWARGANEGARAAN DALAM PELAKSANAAN PENILAIAN PSIKOMOTOR (STUDI DI SMP NEGERI 3 KEBAKKRAMAT KARANGANYAR) Fadrusiana, Erna Gesti; ., Rusnaini; Nuryadi, Muh Hendri
PKn Progresif Vol 11, No 2 (2016)
Publisher : PKn Progresif

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (145.111 KB)

Abstract

This study aims to ascertain:  1) How the competence of civics teachers as implementation of psychomotor rating. 2) What are the inhibiting factors that experienced by civics teachers as implementation of psychomotor rating towards students at Junior High School 3 Kebakkramat Karanganyar.This method on this research is using a qualitative research approach. The type of research is qualitative descriptive. Data source obtained from informant, place, event and document. Sampling technique which used is purposive sampling. In this research, data collection techniques used to obtain and arrange data by interview, observation and document analysis. In the research results, it can be concluded that: 1) pedagogical competence of Civics teacher in implementing rating has been done, but it is not all explanation in each indicators done by civics teachers. In indicator implements rating, process evaluation, and study result, civics teachers have not done yet the administration of process rating and study result chronically by using various instrument. For the indicator of utilizing research result and evaluation to the interest of learning, civics teachers have done well. Also, the indicator doing reflective action of increasing quality of learning. Civics teachers have done it but civics teachers have not done yet research of class action that obtained by that reflective result to improve learning on civics subject. In addition, As for psychomotor rating showed by unsuitable RPP in the making of implementing in class. Teachers apply the psychomotor rating on RPP but it can?t be done yet in learning. Civics teachers in psychomotor rating using technique of rating for job, portfolio, and observation or self-judging; 2) The inhibiting factors that hampered by Civicsteachers on determining of Psychomotor Rating are: hampered by time, difficult to determine the indicator and evaluation aspects of learning materials, the number of students are big, using cognitivist teaching materials and conventional learning models.