Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.817
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Ipso Jure
Deny Guntara
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang, Indonesia
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
Peralihan Harta Waris oleh Seorang Ahli Waris tanpa Persetujuan Ahli Waris Lainnya (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 218 K/Pdt/2020) Ade Ahmad Fauzan; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.811

Abstract

The transfer of rights to an object can be carried out in a real way, meaning that the object obtained can be directly seen and is in the hands of the person concerned, but there is also a transfer of rights that is carried out symbolically or indirectly, only in the form of a letter or certificate, this occurs in immovable objects. The transfer of rights occurs due to the transfer of one person's property rights to another person, for example buying and selling or exchanging or in other ways that are justified by law. The purpose of this study is first to find out the transfer of inheritance according to civil inheritance law in Indonesia and secondly to find out the judge's considerations in the Supreme Court decision number 218 K/Pdt/2020. This study uses a normative juridical approach. The results of research regarding the transfer of inheritance according to civil inheritance law in Indonesia there are two forms, namely the transfer due to the Act and the transition due to a will or testament, then in the Supreme Court Decision Number 218 K / Pdt / 2020 MA stated judex facti, namely the Balige District Court was wrong apply the law so that the Supreme Court cancels and judges itself with a ruling rejecting the Plaintiff's lawsuit (Respondent's cassation).
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pers dalam Tindak Pidana Pencemaran Nama Baik Dihubungkan dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pers (Studi Putusan Nomor 46./Pid.Sus/2021/Pn.Pip) Nurdin Nurdin; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.912

Abstract

In a democratic country, press freedom is very important. As one of the pillars of democracy, the Press Institution has an important role in translating the value of freedom of opinion, obtaining reliable information, and trying to unite the nation. Press workers believe that the detention of columnists during this fair period has really stifled the imagination of press workers and endangered opportunities for articulation as guaranteed in the constitution and Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press. Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning Press Review Decision Number 46./Pid relates to the issues raised in this article regarding criminal liability of the press for acts of defamation. Based on Law Number 40 of 1999 concerning the Press, the person responsible for news material is the media editor, usually represented by the Editor-in-Chief (Pemred), if legal collection occurs. This article uses a normative method to determine the criminal liability of the press. A press regulatory responsibility framework could also be imposed on press organizations. “Vicarious Liability” is the term for this kind of responsibility.
Legal Protection for Public Housing Loan Customers Under Law No. 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection in Housing Transactions Fazri Editiya Mahardika; Deny Guntara; Muhamad Abas
Ipso Jure Vol. 1 No. 10 (2024): Ipso Jure - November
Publisher : PT. Anagata Sembagi Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62872/d29hn512

Abstract

Public housing credit is a program aimed at addressing the housing backlog in Indonesia, yet its implementation faces various challenges. This research focuses on two main issues: (1) What happens to public housing loans when banks go bankrupt? (2) How can consumer issues be resolved when housing loans default? The study uses a normative judicial method. The findings reveal that while the People's Housing Credit (KPR) helps people acquire homes, significant risks arise if credit institutions go bankrupt or debtors default. In cases of default or bank bankruptcy, debtors must still fulfill their credit obligations. Consumer protection is outlined in the 1999 Consumer Law, which includes exit clauses in credit agreements. The government, through the Deposit Insurance Corporation (LPS), can rescue or liquidate banks according to Law No. 24 of 2004. Moreover, drafting fair contracts, offering credit restructuring, and providing insurance options can better protect debtors than asset auctions. Additionally, applying the principle of prudence in credit assessments, as per the Banking Law, is crucial to minimizing default risks. Stricter regulations and robust legal protections are essential for mortgages to effectively help people own homes while ensuring financial and legal stability.
Tinjauan Yuridis Penerapan Peraturan Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 Tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Studi Kasus Penghentian Penuntutan Melalui Surat : Tap-6143/M.2.26/Eoh.2/12/2021 oleh Kejaksaan Negeri Karawang) Didiek Kurnia; Deny Guntara; Gary Gagarin Akbar; Muhamad Abas
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 4 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i4.4530

Abstract

Pendekatan keadilan restoratif hadir sebagai terobosan alternatif dalam sistem penanganan kasus pidana di Indonesia dengan mengedepankan keterlibatan semua pemangku kepentingan: pelaku, korban, negara dan komponen masyarakat. Paradigma ini menawarkan jalur penyelesaian di luar mekanisme pengadilan konvensional melalui proses dialog yang menghasilkan kesepakatan berkeadilan bagi seluruh pihak. Implementasi konsep ini secara formal dimulai dengan diberlakukannya UU No. 11/2012 tentang SPPA yang memperkenalkan konsep diversi. Dalam pelaksanaannya, keadilan restoratif melibatkan koordinasi berbagai institusi penegak hukum. Studi ini melakukan analisis mendalam terhadap implementasi keadilan restoratif di lingkungan Kejaksaan Negeri Karawang berdasarkan regulasi Peraturan Kejaksaan RI Nomor 15 Tahun 2020, dengan mengambil studi kasus spesifik pada Surat PenghentianNo: TAP-6143/M.2.26/Eoh.2/12/2021 yang dikeluarkan pada 27 Desember 2021. Lingkup penelitian mencakup evaluasi mekanisme penerapan serta batasan penghentian penuntutan yang didasarkan pada prinsip keadilan restoratif dalam beragam jenis tindak pidana. Metodologi yang digunakan bersifat penelitian lapangan dengan teknik pengumpulan data melalui observasi langsung di lokasi serta wawancara mendalam dengan jaksa penuntut umum yang bertugas di Kejaksaan Negeri Karawang.
Co-Authors Ade Ahmad Fauzan Didiek Kurnia Fazri Editiya Mahardika Gary Gagarin Akbar Muhamad Abas Nurdin Nurdin