Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Facial Recognition Technology: A Multinational Analysis of Regulatory Framework, Ethics, and Legal Implications in Security and Privacy Abd. Azis DP; Andi Annisa Nurlia Mamonto; Bachrul Amiq; Khairul Mufti Rambe; Alfin Reza Syahputra
International Journal of Science and Society Vol 5 No 4 (2023): International Journal of Science and Society (IJSOC)
Publisher : GoAcademica Research & Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54783/ijsoc.v5i4.808

Abstract

The latest technological developments allow for the presence of facial recognition technology. This technology itself is widely used in everyday life, such as for using personal devices or registering. But at the same time, the presence of this technology can cause problems with personal data. This research then aims to see the relationship between facial recognition technology and regulations, ethics, and legal implications in data security and privacy. This research will be carried out using a descriptive qualitative approach. The data used in this research was obtained through the results of relevant previous research and studies. The results of this research then found that the presence of facial recognition technology has significant benefits, but at the same time poses significant challenges. These challenges generally center around data security and privacy issues. Therefore, it is necessary to have guidelines that can regulate the use of facial technology, so that in the future this technology is not misused, and can maintain the security and privacy of society in general.
Constitutional law implications of the implementation of attorney general regulation number 15 of 2020 for crime victims Farida Tuharea; Wahyudi BR; Andi Annisa Nurlia Mamonto; Liani Sari
Journal of Law Science Vol. 6 No. 1 (2024): January : Law Science
Publisher : Institute Of computer Science (IOCS)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35335/jls.v6i1.4534

Abstract

This research aims to examine the effects of Attorney General’s Regulation (PERJA) Number 15 of 2020 on Indonesian Constitutional Law, specifically examining victim rights and responsibilities and elements of legal certainty in relation to the Termination of Prosecution Based on Restorative Justice. Human rights, victim protection, and procedural justice are some of the Constitutional Law elements that are examined in this study. This study combines philosophical and analytical approaches to normative law with a critical and logical examination of applicable legal theory and police tactics. The relevant rules and statutes are described using analytical descriptive methodologies. Despite presenting obstacles to legal certainty owing to its flexible approach, the study findings demonstrate that the adoption of restorative justice via the Attorney General's Regulation has significantly increased victims' rights in the recovery and reconciliation process. To promote a shift in Indonesia's criminal justice system towards a greater emphasis on justice, victim healing, and societal interests, the Attorney General's Regulation seeks to strike a balance by outlining a clear framework.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PELAKU USAHA DALAM PERJANJIAN FINTECH PAYLATER BERDASARKAN UNDANG-UNDANG PERLINDUNGAN KONSUMEN Zainal Arifin; Muslim Muslim; Revie Kurnia Katjong; Andi Annisa Nurlia Mamonto; Ahmad Rifai Rahawarin
SIBATIK JOURNAL: Jurnal Ilmiah Bidang Sosial, Ekonomi, Budaya, Teknologi, Dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 7 (2026)
Publisher : Penerbit Lafadz Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47353/sibatik.v5i7.5268

Abstract

The financial innovation of Fintech PayLater provides digital transaction convenience but creates a legal imbalance that often harms business actors due to consumers' bad faith. There is a literature gap where current legal protection studies almost exclusively focus on consumer protection, ignoring the vulnerabilities of service providers in the digital ecosystem. This study aims to examine the legal protection for business actors in Fintech PayLater agreements based on Law Number 8 of 1999 concerning Consumer Protection (UUPK) and analyze its dispute resolution mechanisms in the event of a default. The method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The results show that legal protection for business actors stems from the right to be protected from consumers acting in bad faith, manifested through the pacta sunt servanda principle in electronic contracts (click-wrap agreements) as long as business actors are transparent and comply with the prohibition of standard clauses. As a result, it is concluded that non-litigation dispute resolution through the Alternative Dispute Resolution Institution for the Financial Services Sector (LAPS SJK) is the most effective and efficient mechanism for small-value digital transactions compared to litigation.