Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Ulumuna DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM
Aydi Syam, Aydi
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences

Published : 4 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

 1 
NIKAH LINTAS AGAMA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM Syam, Aydi
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2015): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Jurusan Syariah dan Ekonomi Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (833.362 KB) | DOI: 10.28988/diktum.v13i2.370

Abstract

Focus of this paper is to study the legality of Islamic law on interfaith marriage . Basing on some proposition naqliy understood that there are two laws that are contradictory, that is: absolutely forbidden marriage and marriage is permitted / allowed conditionally. This conclusion is based on the QS. al-Baqarah (2) : 221 ; QS. al-Mumtahanah (60) : 10 ; and QS. al-Ma’idah (5) : 5. While understanding the argument of the methodology used is the type of pattern bayāniy mauđū’iy, tahlīliy, and muqāran. While the multidisciplinary approach is more focused on the study of semiotics, historical and culture analysis.
NIKAH LINTAS AGAMA PERSPEKTIF HUKUM ISLAM Syam, Aydi
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol 13 No 2 (2015): Diktum : Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (833.362 KB) | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v13i2.370

Abstract

Focus of this paper is to study the legality of Islamic law on interfaith marriage . Basing on some proposition naqliy understood that there are two laws that are contradictory, that is: absolutely forbidden marriage and marriage is permitted / allowed conditionally. This conclusion is based on the QS. al-Baqarah (2) : 221 ; QS. al-Mumtahanah (60) : 10 ; and QS. al-Ma’idah (5) : 5. While understanding the argument of the methodology used is the type of pattern bayāniy mauđū’iy, tahlīliy, and muqāran. While the multidisciplinary approach is more focused on the study of semiotics, historical and culture analysis.
Religious Moderation and Transnational Islamic Ideology: Phenomena and Implications in Indonesia Aderus, Andi; Ambo Masse, Rahman; Rahman, Amri; Syam, Aydi; Mohammad Subaeh, Syekh Toha Nasir; Firman, Firman
Ulumuna Vol 28 No 1 (2024): June
Publisher : Universitas Islam Negeri Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20414/ujis.v28i1.969

Abstract

This research analyzes Islamic transnational movements, especially the Salafi in South Sulawesi, their internalization, and implications for religious moderation. By applying qualitative methods and a phenomenological approach, this research was carried out in several key locations in South Sulawesi, namely in Makassar, Gowa, and Parepare, including Islamic boarding schools and several strategic mosques. The research reveal that the Salafi da'wah approach, which is effective and responsive to social dynamics, has gained a place in society. However, this puritanical approach faces challenges internalizing religious moderation, especially in interreligious tolerance and adaptation to local culture. Religious moderation offers a solution to create more inclusive and adaptive religious behavior, supporting harmony between religious communities in Indonesia.
Fidyah between Classical Fiqh and Institutional Governance: Social Welfare and Sustainable Justice in Contemporary Indonesia Syam, Aydi; Abd Wahhab Abd Qawiy, Salih Ahmad
DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum Vol. 24 No. 2 (2026): DIKTUM: Jurnal Syariah dan Hukum
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Islam Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Parepare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35905/diktum.v24i2.16898

Abstract

Background:  The determination of fidyah for individuals unable to fast during Ramadan has traditionally been grounded in classical Islamic jurisprudence, which prescribes the provision of staple food to the poor as compensation. In contemporary Muslim societies, however, this obligation is increasingly mediated through institutional governance and monetary valuation Aims:  This article examines the transformation of fidyah between classical fiqh and institutional governance, focusing on how BAZNAS reframes fidyah from a food based juristic obligation into a monetary instrument of Islamic social welfare. This study analyzes it as a site of authority negotiation between juristic doctrine, state recognized religious institutions, local economic realities, and the lived legal practices of Muslim communities Method:   Methodologically, the study employs legal hermeneutics and thematic analysis of Qur’anic foundations, hadith reports, classical juristic interpretations, BAZNAS policy documents, and contemporary scholarship on Islamic social finance, maqasid al sharia, and legal pluralism Findings:  The findings reveal that while classical jurisprudence generally defines fidyah as one mud of staple food per day, the institutional determination of IDR 65,000 reflects a contextual adaptation based on contemporary food consumption patterns and economic conditions. This transformation produces a socio legal tension: monetary standardization may enhance the welfare of recipients and support food security, but it may also challenge local fiqh practices and burden economically vulnerable payers if regional economic differences are ignored. Implication:  The article argues that fidyah should be understood through a maqasid based framework in which hifz al nafs, hifz al mal, and human dignity guide the ethical governance of Islamic social finance. It also underscores the role of institutional interpretation in promoting sustainable justice by ensuring that fidyah remains responsive to the needs of vulnerable communities. Originality:   Its originality lies in repositioning fidyah from a marginal ritual topic into a lived legal mechanism of sustainable justice, where classical fiqh, institutional authority, and grassroots economic realities continuously negotiate one another in contemporary Indonesia  
Co-Authors Abd Wahhab Abd Qawiy, Salih Ahmad Amri Rahman Andi Aderus Firman Firman Mohammad Subaeh, Syekh Toha Nasir Rahman Ambo Masse