Masruchin Ruba’i, Masruchin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pelapor Tindak Pidana Korupsi (Whistleblower) dan Saksi Pelaku yang Bekerjasama (Justice Collaborator) di Indonesia Arjuno, Bambang; Ruba’i, Masruchin; Djatmika, Prija
Jurnal Selat Vol 4 No 2 (2017): JURNAL SELAT
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (824.56 KB)

Abstract

Whistle blower’s corruption case has a significant role in law enforcement, where they are familiarly known as whistle-blower assist law enforcement role in exposing acts of corruption, especially if the person who is the whistle blower participate as suspects. Should the state provide attitude in providing legal protection in such cases that the person providing the information is also awarded in addition to legal protection. In this research using normative legal research will be reviewed in the presence of whistle blower protection laws in order to be opened in a brightly lit cases.  Keywords: Corruption, whistleblowers, Legal Certainty, Fairness   Peniup peluit untuk kasus tindak pidana korupsi mempunyai peranan yang cukup signifikan dalam penegakkan hukum, keberadaan mereka yang akrab disebut sebagai whistle blower membantu peranan penegak hukum dalam mengungkap terjadinya tindak pidana korupsi khususnya jika orang yang menjadi whistle blower ikut menjadi tersangka. Negara Hendaknya memberikan sikap dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum dalam hal demikian agar orang yang memberikan informasi juga mendapatkan penghargaan selain mendapatkan perlindungan hukum. Dalam penelitian ini dengan menggunakan penelitian hukum normatif akan dikaji keberadaan peniup peluit dalam perlindungan hukum agar dapat dibuka secara terang benderang kasus yang ada. Kata Kunci: Korupsi, Peniup Peluit, Kepastian Hukum, Keadilan
Reconstruction of Ethics Supervision System Towards Constitutional Court Justice Wiryanto, Wiryanto; Bakri, Moch; Ruba’i, Masruchin; Djatmika, Prija
Constitutional Review Vol 3, No 1 (2017)
Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (346.201 KB) | DOI: 10.31078/consrev313

Abstract

Ethics supervision of constitutional justices is an important issue for the development of ethics supervision system in the Constitutional Court, because the supervision of constitutional justices is a means of maintaining the independence and impartiality of constitutional justices, which is in fact the main pillar of an independent judiciary. In its development, there has always been a debate about the ethics supervision of the constitutional justices, whether the justices should be overseen externally or internally. This is because, juridically, the law does not regulate it clearly. Based on the above background, the research issues drawn are: (1) What is the significance of ethics supervision toward constitutional justices ?; (2) What is the system of ethics supervision of constitutional justices according to Indonesia’s current positive law, (3) How to reconstruct the system of ethics supervision of constitutional justices more optimally in the future? Based on the result of the research entitled “Reconstruction of Ethics Supervision System toward Constitutional Justice”, the following conclusions are obtained: (1) Based on philosophical, juridical and empirical perspective, ethics supervision of constitutional justices has important meaning in order to maintain and uphold the honor, dignity, and the behavior of constitutional justices. (2) Based on the analysis of the evolution of the ethics supervision system, the result shows that the ethics supervision system toward constitutional justices which is always changing indicates that there is still no standard system as a guideline for the enforcement of alleged violation of ethics against the constitutional justices. Therefore, there is a need for normative reconstruction of the ethics supervision system toward constitutional justices through legislation. (3) The reconstruction of the ethics supervision system toward constitutional justices can be done through: a. Amendment to the 1945 Constitution by adding a new norm governing the provision on ethics supervision system toward constitutional justices, b. Amendment to the Constitutional Court Law.