Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Union: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Anak Bangsa
Nur Amalafitra
STKIP Modern Ngawi
Humanities Education Mathematics

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Learning model experimentation Think Talk Write with project learning against mathematics learning outcomes Nur Amalafitra; Anwas Mashuri; Budi Sasomo
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v11i2.14594

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of seeing which model is better between the TTW learning model and Project learning, TTW, and direct learning of students' mathematics learning outcomes in the matter of comparison of values ​​and comparisons of turning values ​​in class VII SMPN 2 Jogorogo. With a total of 68 students for the experimental group and 34 for the control group. Quasi Experimental Design is the type of research used in this study with the sampling technique that is Cluster Random Sampling. In this study, the sample consisted of three groups with normal and homogeneous distribution. Experimental group I (VII A) was given the TTW learning model with Project learning, Experimental group II (VII B) was given the TTW learning model, while the control group (VII C) was given a direct learning model. Hypothesis testing was carried out by a one way anova test and post-anova follow-up test. The conclusions that can be drawn from this study are (1) Obtained differences in TTW mathematics learning outcomes with Project learning get an average of 78.24, TTW got an average of 71.03, and direct learning get an average of 63.24 with the conclusion Fobs (13,13) ˃ Ftable (3.09). (2) The TTW learning model with Project learning gives results that are as good as the TTW, seen from Fobs (6,06) ˂ Ftable (6,18). (3) The TTW learning model with Project learning gives better results than direct learning, seen from Fobs (26,25) ˃ Ftable (6,18). (4) The TTW learning model gives better results than direct learning, seen from Fobs (7,08)  ˃ Ftable (6,18).
METODE BELAJAR MEMBACA TANPA MENGEJA UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEMAMPUAN MEMBACA ANAK USIA DINI PADA BIMBINGAN BELAJAR ANAK HEBAT (AHE) DIMASA PANDEMI Nur Amalafitra; Sholihatul Muawanah; Budi Sasomo
Jurnal Anak Bangsa Vol. 1 No. 1 (2022): Jurnal Anak Bangsa
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Bina Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46306/jas.v1i1.5

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to find out the method of reading without spelling can improve children's reading skills at the Great Children's Tutoring (AHE) unit Kersoharjo, Geneng District, Ngawi Regency. This research uses descriptive qualitative research. The place of this research is AHE tutoring in Kersoharjo village, Geneng sub-district, Ngawi district. Research informants are tutors, students, and guardians of students in AHE tutoring. The data were collected using observation and interview techniques. To test the validity of the data, triangulation technique was used. The data that has been collected was analyzed using an interactive model. The results showed that: the process of applying the method of learning to read without spelling to improve reading skills in children in AHE tutoring, went through several stages as follows: 1) conditioning the child by telling the child to sit down and preparing writing instruments, and doing brain exercises by drawing as desired. . this stage is in the preliminary activity, 2) invites children to read the module according to the level, 3) then invites children to write what they have got before, 4) invites children to play with letter card media. in stages 2 to 4 are included in the core activities, and continued in the closing activities. In the closing activity there is a stage of reviewing the material learned during one meeting
Learning model experimentation Think Talk Write with project learning against mathematics learning outcomes Nur Amalafitra; Anwas Mashuri; Budi Sasomo
UNION : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika Vol 11 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Sarjanawiyata Tamansiswa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30738/union.v11i2.14594

Abstract

This research was conducted with the aim of seeing which model is better between the TTW learning model and Project learning, TTW, and direct learning of students' mathematics learning outcomes in the matter of comparison of values ​​and comparisons of turning values ​​in class VII SMPN 2 Jogorogo. With a total of 68 students for the experimental group and 34 for the control group. Quasi Experimental Design is the type of research used in this study with the sampling technique that is Cluster Random Sampling. In this study, the sample consisted of three groups with normal and homogeneous distribution. Experimental group I (VII A) was given the TTW learning model with Project learning, Experimental group II (VII B) was given the TTW learning model, while the control group (VII C) was given a direct learning model. Hypothesis testing was carried out by a one way anova test and post-anova follow-up test. The conclusions that can be drawn from this study are (1) Obtained differences in TTW mathematics learning outcomes with Project learning get an average of 78.24, TTW got an average of 71.03, and direct learning get an average of 63.24 with the conclusion Fobs (13,13) ˃ Ftable (3.09). (2) The TTW learning model with Project learning gives results that are as good as the TTW, seen from Fobs (6,06) ˂ Ftable (6,18). (3) The TTW learning model with Project learning gives better results than direct learning, seen from Fobs (26,25) ˃ Ftable (6,18). (4) The TTW learning model gives better results than direct learning, seen from Fobs (7,08)  ˃ Ftable (6,18).
Co-Authors Budi Sasomo, Budi Sholihatul Muawanah