Meylin Sihaloho, Meylin
Unknown Affiliation

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

SELEKSI PENGANGKATAN HAKIM DALAM SISTEM PERADILAN INDONESIA: KAJIAN PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI NOMOR 43/PUU-XII/2015 Sihaloho, Meylin
Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Vol 33, No 2 (2015)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Bandung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (342.12 KB) | DOI: 10.25072/jwy.v33i2.103

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini memiliki tujuan untuk menjelaskan seleksi pengangkatan hakim dalam sistem peradilan Indonesia yang dikaji berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 43/PUU-XII/2015. Penelitian ini mengunakan metode pendekatan yuridis normatif dengan spesifik penelitian berdasarkan deskriptif analisis. Hakim memiliki peran penting dalam sistem peradilan di Indonesia, diharapkan seleksi pengangkatan hakim dilakukan oleh lembaga negara yang berwewenang, berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku agar dapat menjamin independensi lembaga peradilan maupun independensi hakim. Penelitian ini membahas wewenang Mahkamah Agung dan Komisi Yudisial dalam pengangkatan hakim serta memperhatikan landasan akan kemerdekaan kekuasaan kehakiman. Kata Kunci: Seleksi Pengangkatan Hakim, Independensi, Lembaga Peradilan, Hakim, Mahkamah Agung, Komisi Yudisial.
Formulation For Resolution of Partial Or Complete Overlapping of Mining Business Permit Areas Sihaloho, Meylin; Indah Dwi Qurbani; Venny Indria
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 3 (2025): December In progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i3.316

Abstract

Mineral and coal mining plays a strategic role in national development because it contributes to economic growth, energy security, and increased state revenue. However, this sector still faces serious problems in the form of overlapping Mining Business Permit Areas (WIUP), which give rise to legal uncertainty, conflicts of interest, and inefficient natural resource governance. Overlapping permits arise from a weak licensing administration system, regulatory disharmony, and a lack of coordination between central and regional government agencies. This situation has implications for disrupting the investment climate, declining business confidence, and reducing state revenue from the mining sector. As a normative response, Law Number 2 of 2025, specifically Article 171B, regulates the authority of the Central Government to evaluate and revoke Mining Business Permits (IUP) that experience overlap in part or all of their areas. This policy is a strategic step to reorganize licensing and ensure legal certainty in accordance with the mandate of Article 33 of the 1945 Constitution. However, its implementation faces challenges in the form of limited integrated spatial data, a weak national mining information system, and the absence of a standard mechanism for resolving overlapping permit disputes. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach to analyze the urgency and formulation of regulations for resolving overlapping WIUPs. The results of the study indicate that derivative regulations are needed in the form of comprehensive, systematic, and applicable Government Regulations to regulate the evaluation, revocation, and dispute resolution mechanisms in a transparent manner. Thus, clear and integrated regulations are not only able to create legal certainty and justice, but also ensure the utilization of mineral and coal resources for the greatest prosperity of the people.