Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Workplace Bullying, Turnover Intention, and the Moderating Role of Kinship Employee Engagement Eka Pariyanti; Isman; Delila Fitri Harahab
International Journal of Management, Economic, Business and Accounting Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023): International Journal of Management, Economic, Business and Accounting (IJMEBA)
Publisher : PT. Berkah Digital Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58468/ijmeba.v2i2.64

Abstract

Purpose of the study — Testing the Relationship between Workplace Bullying and Turnover Intention, and Examining Kinship Employee Engagement as a Moderating Variable in that Relationship Research method— This Study Conducted in Lampung, Indonesia, Involving Private University Lecturers as Respondents. Data Analysis Utilized JASP. Result— The Results of this Study Indicate a Positive Relationship between Workplace Bullying and Turnover Intention. Kinship Employee Engagement is Found to Moderate this Relationship. Conclusion— All Hypotheses are Supported, Signifying the Importance for Institutions to Strengthen Kinship Employee Engagement.
Product Quality dan Kompetitive Advantage Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Citra Merek Sebagai Variabel Intervening UMKM Kabupaten Bungo Delila Fitri Harahab; Amran; Isman
JOMI: Jurnal Organisasi dan Manajemen Indonesia Vol 1 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : CV. MEDIA PENA MANDIRI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui Pengaruh Product Quality Dan Kompetitive Advantage Terhadap Keputusan Pembelian Melalui Citra Merek Sebagai Variabel Intervening Pada UMKM Pisang Sale Kabupaten Bungo Populasi penelitian ini adalah seluruh masyarakat Kabupaten Bungo dengan sampel 100 orang konsumen dengan menggunakan teknik Purposive sampling. Analisis data pada penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan Partial Least Square (PLS). Hasil penelitian bahwa Product Quality (X1) berpengaruh positif terhadap (Z) Citra Merek, Kompetive Advantage (X2) tidak berpengaruh positif terhadap (Z) Citra Merek, Kompetitive Advantage (X2) berpengaruh positif terhadap (Y), Kompetitive Advantage (X2) berpengaruh positif terhadap (Y) Keputusan Pembelian, Citra Merek(Z) berpengaruh positif terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Y), Product Quality (X1) berpengaruh positif terhadap Keputusan pembelian (Y), Kompetitive Advantage (X2) tidak berpengaruh positif terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Y), Product Quality (X1) dan Kompetitive Advantage (X2) tidak berpengaruh positif terhadap Keputusan Pembelian (Y) melalui Citra Merek (Z).