Teguh Hidayatul Rachmad
Bunda Mulia University

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Moral Genealogy of Michel Foucault in the Ad Hominem Argument in the Terminology of 'Cicak' and 'Buaya' Teguh Hidayatul Rachmad; Yohanes Probo Dwi Sasongko
Jurnal Komunikasi Vol 17, No 2 (2023): September
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Komunikasi UTM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ilkom.v17i2.20121

Abstract

The feud that occurred between government agencies, in this case involving the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK), and government agencies, in this case the National Police, became an ongoing problem that could be considered as a whole. The terminology regarding the KPK and Polri cases, which are synonymous with the term lizard and crocodile, is a separate understanding that needs attention. Public perception of the case varies. There is support for the KPK, but there are also those who justify the treatment of the Police themselves in looking at this case. Foucault's moral genealogy uses ad hominem arguments as the basis for forming his genealogy, used to expose the understanding of lizards and crocodiles. An understanding that society takes for granted as truth and morality. In the genealogy, Foucault sees that in the context of the lizard and the crocodile, there is a kind of power that is to be played and used for a certain interest. There is a purpose to be sought from such a political situation and condition. So, looking at the context of lizards and crocodiles in ad hominem studies is one of the studies of message communication. Political communication that wants to open up new understandings of the logic of human thinking as a whole. 
Interpersonal Communication Strategies for Conflict Management and Relationship Maintenance in Lesbian Couples Vionita Wijaya; Zera Edenzwo Subandi; Teguh Hidayatul Rachmad
Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JISIP) Vol 14, No 2 (2025): August
Publisher : Universitas Tribhuwana Tungga Dewi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33366/jisip.v14i2.3393

Abstract

This study aims to examine how lesbian couples manage conflict through interpersonal communication by analyzing the strategies they use to maintain healthy relationships between them. The approach used is a qualitative case study based on Relationship Rules Theory. The data was gathered over a period of two months through semi-structured interviews, observations, and field notes, capturing both verbal and non-verbal cues. The informants included two lesbian couples, along with insights from a close friend and a relationship counselor. Findings indicate that successful conflict management often depends on open and honest dialogue, willingness to compromise, and a deep understanding of each partner's emotional needs and values. Many couples emphasize the importance of creating a safe space for vulnerability, where both partners feel heard and respected. Additionally, external challenges—such as discrimination or lack of family support—sometimes influence how conflicts are handled, requiring couples to develop additional resilience. By highlighting these communication dynamics, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of how lesbian couples maintain their relationships despite facing social barriers. This research also provides practical insights for relationship counselors, educators, and LGBTQ+ advocates who wish to support healthy conflict resolution in same-sex relationships.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana pasangan lesbian mengelola konflik melalui komunikasi interpersonal dengan menganalisis strategi yang mereka gunakan untuk mempertahankan hubungan yang sehat di antara mereka. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah studi kasus kualitatif berdasarkan Teori Aturan Hubungan. Data dikumpulkan selama dua bulan melalui wawancara semi-terstruktur, observasi, dan catatan lapangan, yang menangkap isyarat verbal dan non-verbal. Informan yang terlibat terdiri dari dua pasangan lesbian, bersama dengan wawasan dari seorang teman dekat dan seorang konselor hubungan. Temuan menunjukkan bahwa pengelolaan konflik yang sukses seringkali bergantung pada dialog yang terbuka dan jujur, kesediaan untuk berkompromi, serta pemahaman yang mendalam tentang kebutuhan emosional dan nilai-nilai masing-masing pasangan. Banyak pasangan menekankan pentingnya menciptakan ruang aman untuk kerentanan, di mana kedua pasangan merasa didengar dan dihormati. Selain itu, tantangan eksternal—seperti diskriminasi atau kurangnya dukungan keluarga—kadang-kadang memengaruhi cara konflik ditangani, sehingga pasangan perlu mengembangkan ketahanan tambahan. Dengan melihat dinamika komunikasi ini, penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pemahaman yang lebih dalam tentang bagaimana pasangan lesbian mempertahankan hubungan mereka meskipun menghadapi hambatan sosial. Penelitian ini juga memberikan wawasan praktis bagi konselor hubungan, pendidik, dan advokat LGBTQ+ yang ingin mendukung resolusi konflik yang sehat dalam hubungan sesama jenis.