Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.562
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Gema Wiralodra JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan)
Aju Putrijanti
Universitas Diponegoro, Indonesia
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Pelanggaran Norma Notaris Melakukan Promosi Jabatan melalui Media Karangan Bunga Dian Restu Salsabila; Aju Putrijanti
JIIP - Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan Vol. 6 No. 8 (2023): JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan)
Publisher : STKIP Yapis Dompu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54371/jiip.v6i8.2430

Abstract

Notaris merupakan profesi di bidang hukum yang memerlukan dan harus menjaga etika pribadi nya dalam menjalankan jabatan atau kewenanganya sesuai dengan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Namun pada kenyataannya masih banyak notaris yang melalukan pelanggaran atau larangan yang tercantum di kode etik profesi notaris yaitu melakukan promosi jabatan menggunakan media karangan bunga. Hal tersebut tentunya telah melanggar peraturan di dalam kode etik. Adapun tujuan dari penelitian ini yaitu bagaimana akibat hukum terhadap notaris yang melakukan promosi jabatan melalui media karangan bunga dan penegakan hukum terhadap notaris yang mempromosikan diri melalui media karangan bunga. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode pendekatan yuridis empiris atau disebut juga penelitian hukum sosiologis. Hasil dari penelitian ini akibat hukumnya yaitu seorang Notaris dapat dijatuhi sanksi atas perbuatannya dan penegakan hukum oleh Dewan Pengawas perlu diketatkan lagi terhadap Notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran supaya menjalankan sanksi nya dan tidak melakukan hal yang sama. Dan melakukan pengawasan secara tegas karena dalam pelaksanaannya masih terdapat adanya kendala yang mengakibatkan masih banyak Notaris yang melakukan pelanggaran.
Pelaksanaan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dalam Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu Secara Sepihak Oleh Pt. Hotel Sahid Jaya International, Tbk (Studi Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Pusat Nomor 186/Pdt.Sus/Phi/2019/Pn.Jkt.Pst.) Muhammad Ariq; Aju Putrijanti
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1327

Abstract

The writing of this scientific work discusses unilateral termination of employment (PHK), which is a layoff carried out on workers or laborers without going through the process regulated by the employment law, therefore the government issued Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning employment. The main problem of this research is what are the legal consequences of termination of employment carried out by PT. Hotel Sahid Jaya International to a worker named Viveka Nanda, based on Law Number 13 of 2003 concerning Employment, and whether the judge's decision in the district court decision Number 186/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst. is in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. Normative Juridical using secondary data. In terms of data processing, it is carried out qualitatively, namely a method that produces analytical descriptive information. The research results are the Central Jakarta District Court Decision Number 186/Pdt.Sus/PHI/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst. not in accordance with statutory regulations regarding employment Number 13 of 2003, the layoff dispute case that occurred between Viveka Nanda as the plaintiff and PT. Hotel Sahid Jaya International as the defendant as a result of the law is null and void. In this case, the judge's decision in district court decision Number 186/Pdt.Sus-PHI/2019/PN.Jkt.Pst. not in accordance with applicable laws and regulations.
Splitting right to use the main building for the residential area of PT. Rahman Abadi Sejahtera, Tasikmalaya Regency Gessy Andrina Putri; Aju Putrijanti
Gema Wiralodra Vol. 14 No. 3 (2023): Gema Wiralodra
Publisher : Universitas Wiralodra

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31943/gw.v14i3.587

Abstract

The main building construction permit is an ownership right that can be owned by the developer and cannot be owned by individuals. Generally, limited companies only have a Main Building Permit and cannot directly become property rights because they cannot become objects of property rights. If it is to be sold to consumers, the building permit will be split into separate building permits. This research was conducted through direct interviews with sources and supported by a literature study. The research method used is qualitative, with data analysis carried out qualitatively. The legal sources used include primary legal and secondary legal materials. The research results show the distribution of permits to build the main building for the residential area of ​​PT. Rahman Abadi Sejahtera Tasikmalaya Regency by applicable regulations. The main obstacles to distributing permits to construct the main building include a long process and inaccurate land boundaries when measuring, which results in discrepancies between the results of building measurements and the location of residential plots.
Co-Authors Dian Restu Salsabila Gessy Andrina Putri Muhammad Ariq