Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal jurnal syntax admiration
Triana Nasution
Universitas Sumatera Utara
Aerospace Engineering Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Implementasi Metode Topsis dalam Pemilihan Lokasi Batching Plant Proyek Jalan Tol Trans Sumatera Ruas Indrapura-Kisaran Triana Nasution; Ahmad Perwira Mulia; Gina Cynthia R Hasibuan
Jurnal Syntax Admiration Vol. 4 No. 10 (2023): Jurnal Syntax Admiration
Publisher : Syntax Corporation Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46799/jsa.v4i10.747

Abstract

Rigid pavement is one of the main works in the construction of toll road projects, which has a large volume and a certain work time. This requires high productivity in ready-mix concrete to support the work. PT. PP Presisi (Tbk), as one of the subcontractors for the Indrapura-Kisaran Trans Sumatra Toll Road Project, uses a Batching Plant (BP) to produce ready-mix concrete. It is hoped that establishing a Batching Plant (BP) will not only be able to supply concrete but also reduce the planned project budget. One of the factors that supports achieving this is selecting the right location. This study uses the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) method to determine the most appropriate location by determining five criteria, 14 sub-criteria, and three alternative locations. This method uses a decision matrix where the best alternative result is the one with the closest distance to the positive ideal solution and the farthest distance to the negative ideal solution. Based on the calculation results, the weight of each alternative is obtained, namely location 1 (0,810), location 2 (0,900), and location 3 (0,159), so that the best alternative location is location 2.
Co-Authors Ahmad Perwira Mulia Gina Cynthia R Hasibuan