Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Restorative Justice Sebagai Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Malpraktek Dokter Pada Polda Jawa Timur Sulianto Sulianto; Wahyu Prawesthi; Moh. Taufik; Syahrul Borman
JOURNAL OF SHARIA ECONOMICS Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Journal of Sharia Economics
Publisher : Program Studi Ekonomi Syariah, Fakultas Ekonomi dan Bisnis Islam, Universitas Al Hikmah Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35896/jse.v4i1.1203

Abstract

Health is one of the basic human rights guaranteed by the state as regulated in Article 28H paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, in carrying out their duties, medical personnel, especially doctors, have a vital role in providing quality health services to the community. However, in practice, it is not uncommon for medical errors to occur which lead to allegations of malpractice crimes, for this reason a study was conducted on the Regulation of Restorative Justice as an Alternative to Settling Criminal Acts of Doctors' Malpractice and the justice and impact of Restorative Justice on the Medical profession, this study uses the Normative Juridical research method with three approaches, the Statute Approach, the Conceptual Approach, and the Case Approach, namely the Medical Malpractice case that has been reported by the Victim with a Public Complaint Report handled by the East Java Regional Police, for the report the doctor as the accused party made peace efforts facilitated by the East Java Regional Police investigators, at the request of the Reported Party the investigator made efforts to examine the material and formal requirements to continue the Restorative Justice efforts
EFFORTS MADE BY POLRI AS LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS IN COMMITTING CRIME WITH VIOLENCE (BEGAL) Hermawan Sutanto; Syahrul Borman
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 4 (2023): OCTOBER
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i4.773

Abstract

The crime of robbery involves theft that can lead to the loss of a person's life. To address this issue, the police are empowered with authority and responsibilities outlined in Article 13 of Law Number 2 of 2002. These responsibilities include maintaining security and public order, upholding the law, and providing protection, services, and assistance to the community. This research aims to (1) understand the role of the National Police in combating criminal acts involving violence (such as "begal"), and (2) explore efforts to uphold the rule of law when addressing such criminal acts. This study adopts a normative legal research approach, incorporating statutory, case-based, and conceptual legal analyses. Legal materials are examined through interpretation and relevant legal theories, leading to deductive conclusions. The findings of this study reveal that (1) Robbery is classified as a criminal act punishable under Criminal Code Articles 365 and 368. The National Police employs preventive measures by advising the public to exercise caution in areas susceptible to robberies. Additionally, repressive legal actions are taken through investigations and trials to administer punishments. (2) If certain conditions for accountability are met, an individual displaying deviant behavior may commit specific criminal acts. Therefore, a perpetrator utilizing a planned approach to commit robbery, accompanied by the required evidence, could be sentenced to up to 12 years of imprisonment.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP KORBAN SEXTORTION MELALUI MEDIA SOSIAL BERDASARKAN UU ITE Sultan Mangku Negoro; Syahrul Borman; Hartoyo; Moh. Taufik
SULTAN ADAM: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Vol 4 No 2 (2026): Juli-Desember 2026
Publisher : Yayasan Pendidikan Tanggui Baimbaian

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.71456/sultan.v4i2.2354

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dan media sosial telah memunculkan berbagai bentuk kejahatan siber, salah satunya sextortion, yang menimbulkan kerugian materiil, psikologis, sosial, serta mengancam hak atas privasi dan martabat korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis penerapan Pasal 27B Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Perubahan Kedua atas Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik terhadap tindak pidana sextortion melalui media sosial, serta mengkaji bentuk perlindungan hukum dan upaya pemulihan hak bagi korbannya. Penelitian ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier dianalisis menggunakan metode deskriptif kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa sextortion melalui media sosial memenuhi unsur tindak pidana pemerasan dan/atau pengancaman melalui sistem elektronik sebagaimana diatur dalam Pasal 27B UU ITE. Perlindungan hukum terhadap korban dilakukan melalui upaya preventif dan represif, meliputi penegakan hukum, pelindungan data pribadi, pemulihan hak korban, serta pendampingan selama proses peradilan. Optimalisasi perlindungan hukum memerlukan sinergi antara aparat penegak hukum, pemerintah, penyelenggara sistem elektronik, dan masyarakat guna menciptakan ruang digital yang aman serta menjamin kepastian hukum bagi korban.
Legal Standing of Witness Protection Under Indonesian Law: The Justice Collaborator in the Richard Eliezer Case Muhammad Alif Akbari; Rengga Fatma Jaya; Irawan Soerodjo; Syahrul Borman; Dudik Djaja
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026): July - December
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v6i1.2497

Abstract

Indonesia is a state founded on the rule of law in which the criminal justice process increasingly depends on insiders willing to cooperate with law enforcement. The institution of the justice collaborator was designed for that purpose, yet its legal foundation in Indonesia remains scattered across a statute and a Supreme Court Circular Letter, leaving its standing contestable, particularly when the cooperating witness is also a direct perpetrator of a grave crime. This study examines two problems: the legal standing of witness protection for a justice collaborator in relation to the prevailing legislation in the Richard Eliezer case, and the forms of legal protection afforded to witnesses under Law Number 31 of 2014 on the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. The research applies a normative juridical method combining statute, case, and analytical approaches, drawing on primary legal materials, secondary literature, and the South Jakarta District Court ruling, analysed deductively. The findings show that Eliezer’s standing as a justice collaborator was established through judicial discretion that bridged a statutory gap, because Circular Letter Number 4 of 2011 does not expressly list premeditated murder and leaves the term not the main perpetrator undefined. Protection under Law Number 31 of 2014 takes the forms of physical and psychological safety, legal immunity, special procedural treatment, and rewards administered by the Witness and Victim Protection Agency, while the Circular Letter operates as organic regulation filling a legal vacuum. The study contributes a reasoned argument for elevating justice collaborator criteria into statute and strengthening the protection agency.