Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Bharasumba Jurnal Multidispliner De Facto: Journal of international multidisciplinary sciences
Jamil
Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton
Religion Arts Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
PENERAPAN PASAL 28 AYAT (1) UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELETRONIK DALAM TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN BISNIS ONLINE La Ode Dedi Abdullah; Endang Tri Pratiwi; Jamil; LM Karim
Jurnal Multidisipliner Bharasumba Vol 2 No 03 July (2023): Jurnal Multidisipliner Bharasumba
Publisher : Pusat Studi Ekonomi, Publikasi Ilmiah dan Pengembangan SDM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Hasil penelitian ini yang pertama adalah Peraturan hukum yang dapat dikenakan kepada pelaku penipuan tergantung dari perbuatan yang dilakukan oleh pelaku penipuan, dikarenakan setiap kasus penipuan memiliki perbedaan pada pelaku kejahatan dan perbedaan pada perbuatan/cara-cara yang dilakukan pelaku. Terutama penerapan pasal 28 ayat (1) undang-undang ITE ini dapat di tepakan kepada kasus penipuan bisnis, khusus bagi tindak pidana bisnis online. Dan yang kedua adalah Pada simpulan bentuk-bentuk penipuan ini penulis menemukan tiga bentuk penipuan bisnis online (E-commerce) yaitu Penipuan harga diskon pada Harbolnas yakni Pelaku kejahatan penipuan dalam kasus ini adalah penjual, Penipuan barang tidak sesuai pesanan dan Penipuan berpura-pura menjual barang
Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Terhadap Residivis Tindak Pidana Narkotika (Studi Putusan Nomor 127/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Baubau) Nawir Dwi Saputra; La Ode Mhammad Karim; Jamil
DE FACTO : Journal Of International Multidisciplinary Science Vol 4 No 02 (2026): DE FACTO : Journal Of International Multidisciplinary Sciences
Publisher : Pusat Studi Ekonomi, Publikasi Ilmiah dan Pengembangan SDM

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62668/defacto.v4i02.2874

Abstract

Criminal liability against recidivists in narcotics offenses raises a significant legal problem because it involves offenders who have previously served a criminal sentence but repeat the same offense, in this case while still serving a sentence for an earlier narcotics conviction at Class IIA Correctional Institution of Baubau. This study aims to examine criminal liability of narcotics offense recidivists under Indonesian criminal law and to analyze the judge's considerations in imposing a sentence on the recidivist in Decision Number 127/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Baubau. This research employs a normative legal method using statute, case, and conceptual approaches, with primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials collected through library research and analyzed descriptively-qualitatively. The results show that criminal liability for narcotics recidivists in Indonesia remains grounded in the principle of culpability, so that recidivist status does not automatically render a person criminally liable; the status functions instead as an aggravating circumstance whose application must nevertheless observe the specific arrangement of Article 144 of Law Number 35 of 2009 on Narcotics as lex specialis. In Decision Number 127/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Baubau, the panel of judges proved the elements of the narcotics offense under Article 114 paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 132 paragraph (1) of the Narcotics Law before considering the defendant's recidivist status, the fact that the offense was committed while serving a previous sentence, the defendant's active role in organizing the narcotics distribution, and the quantity of narcotics involved, while still weighing mitigating circumstances. These considerations resulted in a sentence of twelve years of imprisonment and a fine of Rp1,000,000,000.00, reflecting a sentencing orientation that combines retribution, special and general prevention, and the protection of society.
Co-Authors Endang Tri Pratiwi La Ode Dedi Abdullah La Ode Mhammad Karim LM Karim Nawir Dwi Saputra