Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Dampak Psikologis dan Sosial Korban Kejahatan Revenge Porn Ditinjau dari Perspektif Viktimologi Marlia Marlia; Ni Ketut Sari Adnyani; I Putu Dwika Ariestu
Jurnal Kajian Hukum Dan Kebijakan Publik | E-ISSN : 3031-8882 Vol. 3 No. 4 (2026): Januari-Februari
Publisher : CV. ITTC INDONESIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62379/jkhkp.v3i2.2118

Abstract

The rapid development of information technology has brought various conveniences to society, but it has also sparked new formsof crimes in the digital space, one of which is revenge porn. This act refers to the distribution of intimate photos or videos of someone without consent, aimed at embarrassing, degrading, or damaging the victim's reputation. This study aims to analyze the psychological and social impacts experienced by victims of from a victimology perspective. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary legal materials in the form of legislation, secondary legal materials in the form of scientific literature, and tertiary legal materials as supporting materials. The research results show that causes serious psychological impacts on victims, such as anxiety, trauma, a sense of insecurity, and mental health disorders. In addition, victims also experience social impacts in the form of stigma, victim blaming, social isolation, as well as the risk of secondary victimization. This situation is often exacerbated by the lack of public understanding regarding electronically-based sexual violence and the potential criminalization of victims through certain legal provisions. Therefore, strengthening regulations, increasing public awareness, and providing more comprehensive protection for victims of crimes are necessary.
HARMONISASI PENEGAKAN HUKUM TINDAK PIDANA NARKOTIKA PASCA PEMBERLAKUAN UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2023 MELALUI ANALISIS KOMPARATIF PASAL 111 DAN PASAL 114 DALAM PERSPEKTIF CIVIL LAW SYSTEM DAN COMMON LAW SYSTEM Ni Nyoman Ayu Hari Savitri; Ni Putu Rai Yuliartini; Dewa Gede Sudika Mangku; I Putu Dwika Ariestu
Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia Vol. 9 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23887/jatayu.v9i1.120067

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi pemberlakuan UU No. 1 Tahun 2023 (KUHP Baru) terhadap penerapan Pasal 111 dan Pasal 114 UU Narkotika, serta membandingkannya dengan sistem hukum Common Law (Amerika Serikat) dan Civil Law (Belanda). Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perbandingan hukum. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa KUHP Baru membawa paradigma keseimbangan (monodualistik) yang memengaruhi diskresi hakim dalam penjatuhan sanksi minimum khusus pada UU Narkotika. Perbandingan menunjukkan bahwa Indonesia masih cenderung punitif dibandingkan Belanda, namun mulai mengadopsi fleksibilitas pemidanaan yang serupa dengan prinsip-prinsip dalam sistem Common Law melalui judicial pardon
Judicial Pardon in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System: The Construction of Normative Parameters to Ensure Legal Certainty : Pemaafan Hakim dalam Sistem Pemidanaan Indonesia: Konstruksi Parameter Normatif untuk Menjamin Kepastian Hukum Tono Wilson Tamba; Ni Putu Ega Parwati; I Putu Dwika Ariestu
Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari'ah Law Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari'ah Law (JICL): Jurnal Perbandingan H
Publisher : Journal of Indonesian Comparative of Syari'ah Law

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21111/jicl.v9i2.90

Abstract

within the Indonesian criminal justice system and to formulate a normative parameter framework for the indicators governing the granting of judicial pardons, thereby ensuring legal certainty. The central issue addressed is the ambiguity of the provisions in Article 54, paragraph (2) of Law Number 1 of 2023 concerning the Criminal Code; the article lists only general indicators without providing operational normative parameters, creating a risk of judicial subjectivity, sentencing disparities, and legal uncertainty. This study employs a normative legal research method utilizing statutory, conceptual, and case-based approaches through a literature review, with qualitative analysis based on grammatical, systematic, and teleological interpretations. The findings indicate that a judicial pardon ruling constitutes a form of punishment elimination that does not negate the offender's culpability or criminal liability. The primary weakness of Article 54, paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code lies in the absence of normative parameters clarifying the application of the indicators for granting a judicial pardon. As a contribution to legal reform, this study constructs normative parameters through a systematic interpretation of Article 54, paragraph (2) in conjunction with Article 70, paragraph (1), letters j and l of the Criminal Code; these parameters encompass the admission of guilt, expressions of remorse, cooperative behavior, psychological assessment or social inquiry results, recommendations from community correctional officers, support from family and the social environment, and the availability of rehabilitation programs outside correctional institutions. This framework serves as a guide for more objective judicial interpretation when applying judicial pardons, thereby minimizing sentencing disparities, strengthening legal certainty, and supporting the objectives of national criminal law reform.