Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Badamai Law Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jotika
Dani Habibi
Universitas Nahdlatul Ulama Surakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
FENOMENOLOGI SOSIAL MEDIA DI KALANGAN REMAJA : KAJIAN KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA, HUKUM, DAN AGAMA Dani Habibi; Jaenuri; Laila Fitri Nur Hidayah
Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Jotika Vol. 3 No. 1 (2023): Agustus
Publisher : Jotika English and Education Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56445/jppmj.v3i1.102

Abstract

Media sosial menjadi suatu kebutuhan yang penting untuk sat ini. Mulai dari remaja hingga orang tua membutuhkan media sosial untuk menunjang komunikasi yang semakin berkembang pada saat ini. Penggunaan media sosial juga bisa berdampak buruk bagi remaja yang masih belum memahami penggunaan media sosial secara baik dan benar. Hal ini berdampa kepada salahnya di dalam penggunaan media sosail bagi remaja saat ini yang juga mempengaruhi masa depan mereka. Berdsasarkan hal tersebut perlu kiranya dilakukan suatu pengabdian masyartakat tentang bagaiman pengunaan media sosial yang baik dan benar ditinjau dari segi hukum, agama dan bahasa. Sehingga dengan tujuan ini diharapkan para remaha saat ini dapat dengan baik dan bijak dalam menggunakan media sosial.
PERKEMBANGAN FIKTIF NEGATIF DAN TINDAKAN FAKTUAL BERSIFAT OMISI DI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA Aju Putrijanti; Dani Habibi; Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja
Badamai Law Journal Vol 11, No 1 (2026)
Publisher : Program Magister Hukum Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32801/damai.v11i1.25391

Abstract

This research focus on the development of fictitious negative and factual act omission after Supreme Court Regulation Number 2 of 2024 issued. The principle lex posteriori derogat legi priori was implemented against Article Number 3 of Law Number 5 of 1986 of Administrative Court. It was caused by the stipulation of Article Number 53 of Law Number 30 of 2014 of Government Administration, stated that the Administrative Court has authority to examine fictitious positive application, but then it was eliminated by Law Number 11 of 2020 of Job Creation. This elimination caused legal gap and legal uncertainty about the mechanism to get government decree and access to justice. People tried to used mechanism of factual act omission lawsuit, to get justice, because, first, there is no certain regulation which gives authority to Administrative Court to examine fictitious positive application, second, to give justice and legal certainty. The aims of this research are to get to know the development of fictitious negative and factual act omission lawsuit and the regulation refer to fictitious negative and factual act omission lawsuit as access to justice. This research used a doctrinal method and statute approach, conceptual approach and comparative approach to analysis and answer the legal problems. Research results shows fictitious negative lawsuit mechanism can be used to get access to justice, because, there is no cancellation of this regulation, and to give legal certainty and justice to whomsoever might needed. Government should make a new regulation according to Administrative Court system, which resolve the legal problems and legal certainty, and to fulfilled   access to justice.  
Co-Authors Aju Putrijanti Anggita Doramia Lumbanraja Jaenuri Laila Fitri Nur Hidayah