Achmad Syahruddin
STIE Widya Praja Tanah Grogot

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PENGARUH GAYA KEPEMIMPINAN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA TANAMAN PANGAN DAN HORTIKULTURA KABUPATEN PASER Indah Febrianti Alman; Achmad Syahruddin; Mustaqiem
Paser Institute Management and Busines Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Juni, 2023
Publisher : PIRSAP (Paser Institute for Scientific Research and Publications)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of leadership style on employee performance at the District Horticulture and Food Crops Service. Paser The location of the research was carried out at the Department of Food Crops and Horticulture, Paser Regency. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of leadership style which includes the variables of Autocratic Leadership Style (X,), Democratic Leadership Style (X2), and Laissez-faire Leadership Style (X) on Employee Performance (Y) in the District Food Crops and Horticulture Service. Paser. This type of research is quantitative research with the analytical tool used is multiple linear regression analysis processed with the help of SPSS (Statistical Packages For Social Sciences). From the results of the study, the results of the validity test were obtained from the number of questions as many as 13 items, all of which had an r count value that was more than the rasset value = 0.2480, which meant that all questions were valid. From the results of the reliability test, it can be seen that a result of 0.785 is obtained, which means that the questionnaire items can be said to be reliable (proper) because Cronbach's Alpha > 0.6. The regression equation Y=-0.077 + 0.300 X + 0.718 X + 0.012 X. The magnitude of the correlation coefficient (R) is 0.767. This shows that there is a strong relationship between the variables of Autocratic Leadership Style (X,), Democratic Leadership Style (X), Laissez-Faire Leadership Style (X) on Employee Performance (Y) in the Food Crops and Horticulture Office of Paser Regency. While the coefficient of determination (R2) is 0.588. This shows that 58.8% variation or change in the value of the dependent variable (employee performance) can be explained by the independent variable (leadership style) consisting of autocratic leadership style (X), democratic leadership style (X2), laissez-faire leadership style (X) , then 41.2% is influenced by other variables not examined.
PENGARUH PENGAWASAN TERHADAP KINERJA KARYAWAN PADA INDUSTRI JASA PERDAGANGAN DAN KOPERASI DAN USAHA KECIL MENENGAH KABUPATEN PASER Sri Kurniati Idha; Achmad Syahruddin; Amir Hamzah
Paser Institute Management and Busines Vol 1 No 1 (2023): Juni, 2023
Publisher : PIRSAP (Paser Institute for Scientific Research and Publications)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The research was conducted at the Department of Industry, Trade and Cooperatives & Small and Medium Enterprises, Paser Regency. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of Supervision consisting of Internal Supervision (X1), External Supervision (X2), Preventive Supervision (X3), and Repressive Supervision (X4) on Employee Performance (Y) at the Office of Industry, Trade and Cooperatives & Small and Medium Enterprises of Paser Regency. The population in this study were all employees, totaling 213 people and the samples taken in this study were 83 people. The validity test has a value of 17 questions, all of which have a value greater than 0.2159 or rcount > rtable, which means that it can be concluded that all questions are valid. The reliability test obtained a Cronbach's alpha value of 0.731 and this value was greater than 0.60 or 0.731 > 0.60 so that the questionnaire used could be declared reliable. Partially the variable Repressive Supervision (X4) has a partial effect on Employee Performance (Y) tcount > ttable (4.574 > 1.99085) and the variables of Internal Control (X1), External Monitoring (X2), Preventive Control (X3) have no partial effect on Employee Performance (Y) tcount < ttable Internal Monitoring (X1) (0.221 < 1.99085), External Monitoring (X2) (1.044 < 1.99085), Preventive Monitoring (X3) (0.145 < 1.99085) . Because the tcount results of Repressive Supervision (X4) are greater than tcounts of Internal Supervision (X1), External Supervision (X2), and Preventive Supervision (X3), Repressive Supervision (X4) is declared to have a dominant influence on Employee Performance (Y).
PENGARUH BUDAYA ORGANISASI TERHADAP KINERJA PEGAWAI PADA DINAS TENAGA KERJA DAN TRANSMIGRASI KABUPATEN PASER Rizkyah Nur Ayuni; Erni Susanti; Achmad Syahruddin
Paser Institute Management and Busines Vol 1 No 2 (2023): Desember, 2023
Publisher : PIRSAP (Paser Institute for Scientific Research and Publications)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to evaluate the influence of Organizational Culture (X) on Employee Performance (Y) at the Paser Regency Manpower and Transmigration Service. Organizational Culture Variables (X) consist of Innovation and Risk Taking (X1), Attention to Details (X2), Results Orientation (X3), People Orientation (X4), Team Orientation (X5), Aggressiveness (X6), and Stability (X7). The sample consisted of 61 employees using a saturated sampling technique. Testing the validity and reliability of the questionnaire was carried out before multiple linear regression analysis. The results show 32 valid and reliable statements. The regression equation found is Y = 0.539 + 0.507 X1 + 0.074 X2 - 0.099 X3 + 0.017 X4 - 0.001 A multiple correlation of 0.910 shows a very strong relationship between Organizational Culture and Employee Performance, with an adjusted R Square value of 80.5%. Simultaneous testing shows that overall organizational culture has a significant effect on employee performance (Fcount > Ftable, p-value < 0.05). Partial testing indicates that the variables Innovation and Risk Taking (X1), Aggressiveness (X6), and Stability (X7) have a positive effect on Employee Performance. However, the variables Attention to Details (X2), Results Orientation (X3), People Orientation (X4), and Team Orientation (X5) do not have a significant influence. Thus, the hypothesis that Aggressiveness (X6) has a dominant influence on Employee Performance is not proven.