Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Qua Teknika Issues in Mathematics Educations (IMED)
Nur Rahayu
Unknown Affiliation
Education Engineering Mathematics

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Issues in Mathematics Educations (IMED)

 1 
Deskripsi Kreativitas dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Berbasis Timss Ditinjau dari Kemampuan Awal Matematika Siswa SMPN 2 Barombong Ruslan; Hamda; Nur Rahayu
Issues in Mathematics Education (IMED) Vol. 5 No. 1 (2021): Volume 5 Nomor 1 tahun 2021
Publisher : Program of Mathematics Education Department of Mathematics Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences (FMIPA) Universitas Negeri Makassar (UNM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35580/imed44856

Abstract

The research is a qualitative study using a descriptive method that aims to determaine students’ creativity in solving TIMSS-based questions the cognitive domain. The subjects in this study were six students from the VIII C class of SMPN 2 Barombong. The research’s subject is based on the mathematical ability result of the VIII C class. Then, the result is divides students into two categories of mathematical ability: students with high and low abilities. The researcher used the creativity test and interview guidelines to collect the data. The result of this study indicates that (1) the subject in the cognitive domain of applying algebraic content, high initial abilities meet the aspects of fluency and flexibility. Which meant that obtained creative thinking ability level 3 (creative); (2) the subject in the cognitive domain of applying algebraic content, low initial abilities do not meet the aspects of fluency, flexibility, and novelty. Which meant that obtained creative thinking ability level 0 (not creative); (3) the subject n the cognitive domain of reasoning algebraic content that high initial abilities meet the aspect of flexibility. Which meant that obtain creative thinking ability level 2 (creative enough); (4) the subjects in the cognitive domain of reasoning algebraic content that low initial abilities do not meet the aspects of fluency, flexibility, and novelty. Which meant that obtained creative thinking ability level 0 (not creative).
Co-Authors Hamda Nur janah Ruslan