Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Analisis Efektivitas Persidangan Pidana Secara Elektronik : (Studi di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas II Marisa) Herlambang Bagus Purnomo; Rustam HS. Akili; Robby W. Amu
Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Juni : Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
Publisher : STAI YPIQ BAUBAU, SULAWESI TENGGARA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59059/mutiara.v2i3.1237

Abstract

Electronic Trial is a series of processes of examining, adjudicating and deciding the Defendant's case by the Court which is carried out with the support of information and communication technology, audio visual and other electronic means based on the provisions of Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Number 4 of 2020 concerning the Administration and Trial of Criminal Cases in Electronic Courts. Carrying out administration and litigation in court through an electronic system to realize the creation of a litigation system that is more orderly, easier and in line with the needs of the times. This electronic court proceeding system is more familiar with the term e-Court. The method used in this writing is empirical juridical with an emphasis on juridical facts obtained by field researchers. The mechanism for conducting electronic hearings is based on the provisions of Article 1 Numbers 11 and 12, including electronic case administration, namely the process of delegating, receiving and numbering cases, determining the day of the hearing, determining the method of the hearing, sending summons/notifications, submitting objection documents, responding to objections, demands. , defense, replica, duplicate, verdict, excerpt of the verdict, sending a copy of the verdict to the Prosecutor and Investigator electronically via the E-court application system. The purpose of establishing electronic trials, known as e-litigation, is to support the effectiveness of a court in adjudicating and examining cases so that they can be effective in accordance with the principles of simple, fast and low-cost justice.
Rekonstruksi Hak Akses Advokat terhadap Berkas Perkara dalam Kuhap 2025 Berbasis Teori Dua Kaki Keadilan Arifin Andiwewang; Ibrahim Ahmad; Robby W. Amu
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3138

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of improving the professionalism of Satbrimob in riot control so that its actions remain firm, legal, proportional, accountable, and respectful of human rights. The objectives of this study are to analyze the regulations and existing conditions of the riot control capabilities of Satbrimob personnel, identify factors that hinder professionalism, and formulate an ideal and implementable capability development strategy.The type of research used is empirical juridical research with a socio-legal research approach, conducted through library research, interviews, limited observation, and normative-qualitative analysis.The results of the study indicate that the legal basis and standard operating procedures for riot control are relatively strong; however, their implementation has not been optimal due to the gap between regulations and field practices. The main obstacles include legal, institutional, human resource, infrastructure, and organizational culture aspects.The required strategies include realistic scenario-based training, strengthening field leadership, modernizing non-lethal equipment, improving tactical communication, and conducting continuous evaluation. This study recommends that Satbrimob strengthen human rights-based training, emotional control, cross-functional coordination, and a humanistic organizational culture so that riot control can be carried out professionally and gain public trust.