Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
1.048
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Sriwijaya Law Review Pleno Jure Journal of Judicial Review JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Ibrahim Ahmad
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Gorontalo
Religion Humanities Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Environmental Science Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Social Sciences Other

Published : 7 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

 1 
Urgensi Beracara di Pengadilan Perdata Terhadap Hukum Acara perdata Oyaldi Puhi; Rustam Hs Akili; Ibrahim Ahmad; Roy Marthen Moonti; Muten Nuna
PLENO JURE Vol 10 No 1 (2021): Pleno Jure, April
Publisher : LL-DIKTI Wilayah IX Sulawesi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37541/plenojure.v10i1.554

Abstract

Hukum acara perdata merupakan hukum perdata formil, yang pada dasarnya berfungsi mempertahankan atau menegakkan hukum perdata materiil melalui pengadilan apabila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap hukum perdata materiil atau terjadi sengketa. Bahkan hukum acara perdata juga mengatur bagaimana tata cara memperoleh hak dan kepastian hukum manakala tidak terjadi sengketa melalui pengajuan “permohonan” ke pengadilan. Artikel ini ingin menjelaskan bagaimana mekanisme beracara di pengadilan perdata terhadap hukum acara perdata, dengan menggunakan metode penulisan secara normatif. Sebagai kesimpulan, artikel ini menjelaskan bahwa didalam beracara hukum acara perdata dapat ditinjau dalam dua aspek yakni dalam arti luas dan dalam arti sempit, dalam arti luas beracara meliputi segala tindakan hukum yang dilakukan, baik di luar maupun di dalam persidangan di pengadilan guna menyelesaikan suatu perkara menurut ketentuan hukum acara perdata. Sedangkan dalam arti sempit, beracara meliputi tindakan beracara di dalam persidang di pengadilan dari sidang pertama sampai dengan hakim menjatuhkan putusannya. Sedangkan untuk prosedur dalam pengajuan Gugatan di Pengadilan merujuk pada Pasal 118 ayat (1) Herizen Indlandsch Reglement (“HIR”)/Pasal 142 RBg. Abstract. Civil procedural law is formal civil law which basically is to defend or enforce material civil law through the court if there is a violation of the law toward material civil law or a dispute. Even the civil procedural law also regulates how to obtain legal rights and certainty, if there is no dispute through filing an "application" to the court. This article aims to explain how the procedure of mechanisms in civil courts toward civil procedural law by using the normative writing method. In conclusion, this article explains that civil procedural law proceedings can be viewed in two aspects, which are broad sense and narrow sense. In the broad sense, it includes all legal actions that are taken both outside and inside the court to resolve the case according to the provisions of civil procedural law. Whereas in a narrow sense, it includes proceeding at trial in court from the first trial until the judge makes his decision. whereas, the procedure for filing a lawsuit in court is referring to Article 118 paragraph (1) Herizen Indlandsch Reglement (“HIR”) / Article 142 RBg.
Budget Supervision and Mechanism by an Administrative Village in Indonesia Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Sriwijaya Law Review VOLUME 3 ISSUE 2, JULY 2019
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Sriwijaya University, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/slrev.Vol3.Iss2.213.pp176-186

Abstract

The role of government in budget management is something that must be done adequately based on the principles such as transparency, accountability, participation, and aspiration; because it is closely related to services in the village. The budget management should be conducted based on the applicable regulations. However, there are often found many village apparatus who has a potency to abuse their power in its authorities. This phenomenon, furthermore, causing some polemics among peoples and tends to abandon some regulations which should become a basis of the apparatus policies. The research aims at investigating the mechanism of village development budget management and the control of village development budget management. The mechanism, however, should be started with proper planning, budgeting, implementation, business manager, report, and accountability. Also, management control is must be done through several stages, such as pre supervision, channelization, use, and post channelization.
Esensi Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata melalui Mediasi Nonlitigasi Muten Nuna; Ibrahim Ahmad; Agustina Bilondatu; Dince Aisa Kodai; Roy Marthen Moonti
Journal of Judicial Review Vol 23 No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4390

Abstract

There are legal issues in the society which resolved through a non-litigation mediation process, especially in civil disputes, where there are several factors that influence people prefer to settle legal issues through non-litigation aspects rather than resolving cases by litigation or through the court. This article aims at explaining how the principles and stages of civil dispute resolution through non-litigation mediation and the essence or value that can be used for the society in dispute. So it can be concluded that this article wants to explain that non-litigation mediation in principle has a consensual as well as collaborative nature, so the result will have win-win solution for each sides, so that the problematic side is cannot be harmed. Then there is a very large value which can be taken, if several problems that arise in society, especially in civil cases which resolved through non-litigation mediation aspects.
Peran Ditreskrimsus Dalam Penanggulangan Tindak Pidana Penyebaran Berita Bohong Dan Ujaran Kebencian (Studi Polda Gorontalo) Rahmat Paneo; Yusrianto Kadir; Ibrahim Ahmad
JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : CV. KAMPUS AKADEMIK PUBLISHING

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61722/jmia.v3i3.10726

Abstract

Penelitian ini mengkaji peran Ditreskrimsus Polda Gorontalo dalam penanggulangan tindak pidana penyebaran Berita Bohong dan ujaran kebencian di media sosial. Tujuan penelitian adalah: (1) menganalisis efektivitas penegakan hukum dalam menindak pelaku tindak pidana penyebaran Berita Bohong dan ujaran kebencian, serta faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi efektivitas tersebut dalam konteks hukum pidana dan perlindungan hak asasi masyarakat; dan (2) mengidentifikasi tantangan, hambatan, serta keterbatasan institusional yang dihadapi aparat kepolisian dalam penegakan hukum terhadap tindak pidana dimaksud. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode kualitatif dengan data primer yang diperoleh melalui wawancara bersama penyidik, didukung data sekunder berupa peraturan perundang-undangan yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Ditreskrimsus telah melaksanakan tiga pendekatan utama, yaitu upaya pre-emtif melalui edukasi dan sosialisasi literasi digital, upaya preventif melalui patroli siber dan deteksi dini konten bermasalah, serta upaya represif melalui proses penegakan hukum dari penyelidikan hingga pelimpahan perkara ke pengadilan. Adapun hambatan yang ditemukan meliputi ketentuan hukum yang bersifat multitafsir, keterbatasan kemampuan forensik digital, penggunaan akun anonim oleh pelaku, serta rendahnya literasi digital masyarakat
Rekonstruksi Hak Akses Advokat terhadap Berkas Perkara dalam Kuhap 2025 Berbasis Teori Dua Kaki Keadilan Arifin Andiwewang; Ibrahim Ahmad; Robby W. Amu
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3138

Abstract

This research is motivated by the importance of improving the professionalism of Satbrimob in riot control so that its actions remain firm, legal, proportional, accountable, and respectful of human rights. The objectives of this study are to analyze the regulations and existing conditions of the riot control capabilities of Satbrimob personnel, identify factors that hinder professionalism, and formulate an ideal and implementable capability development strategy.The type of research used is empirical juridical research with a socio-legal research approach, conducted through library research, interviews, limited observation, and normative-qualitative analysis.The results of the study indicate that the legal basis and standard operating procedures for riot control are relatively strong; however, their implementation has not been optimal due to the gap between regulations and field practices. The main obstacles include legal, institutional, human resource, infrastructure, and organizational culture aspects.The required strategies include realistic scenario-based training, strengthening field leadership, modernizing non-lethal equipment, improving tactical communication, and conducting continuous evaluation. This study recommends that Satbrimob strengthen human rights-based training, emotional control, cross-functional coordination, and a humanistic organizational culture so that riot control can be carried out professionally and gain public trust.
Perlindungan Hukum terhadap Pekerja dalam Proses Penyelesaian Sengketa di Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial Meiske Abdullah; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3298

Abstract

The government needs to strengthen the industrial relations dispute resolution system so that it is more accessible to workers. This strengthening can be carried out through the equitable distribution of Industrial Relations Courts, simplification of litigation procedures, improvement of legal aid services, and assistance for workers who lack an understanding of labor law. The use of e-court also needs to be optimized, but it must be accompanied by digital literacy and supporting facilities so that it does not create new obstacles. In addition, a special enforcement mechanism should be established in industrial relations cases so that Industrial Relations Court decisions can be implemented immediately and workers’ rights are not delayed. Judges, mediators, labor inspectors, and labor unions also need to improve their capacity and commitment to substantive justice. Employers are expected to comply with court decisions voluntarily and prioritize deliberative settlement from the initial stage. Through these reforms, the Industrial Relations Court will not merely serve as a formal forum, but will truly function as a means of legal protection that is fast, affordable, certain, and just for workers.
Analisis Efisiensi Tiga Mekanisme Pengakuan Bersalah dalam KUHAP 2025: Pasal 78, Pasal 205, dan Pasal 234 Erfan Afandi; Roy Marthen Moonti; Ibrahim Ahmad
Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): Juni : Jembatan Hukum : Kajian ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/jembatan.v3i2.3300

Abstract

The reform of criminal procedural law through Law Number 20 of 2025 concerning the Criminal Procedure Code introduced a confession of guilt through three mechanisms spread across Article 78, Article 205, and Article 234. All three have different entry points, requirements, and examination patterns, but all lead to a brief examination. This study aims to analyze the construction and efficiency of these three mechanisms, while identifying overlaps, repetition of stages, and potential uncertainty in their application. The study uses normative legal methods with statutory, conceptual, and comparative legal approaches. The results show that Article 78 forms a written agreement mechanism between the public prosecutor and the defendant before the main case examination; Article 205 opens up the defendant's confession after peace efforts are not achieved; while Article 234 allows for a transfer to a brief examination when the defendant admits all charges when the indictment is read. Although intended to expedite the resolution of cases, these three routes are not yet fully efficient because they still go through a series of prosecution, transfer, preliminary hearing or reading of the indictment, verification of the confession, and a brief examination which in certain cases can be longer than normal trial practice. In conclusion, the primary issue is no longer defining the requirements for cases that can use a guilty plea, as these are already stipulated in the 2025 Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), but rather harmonizing the three mechanisms to ensure simplicity, consistency, and the absence of additional procedural layers.
Co-Authors Agustina Bilondatu Arifin Andiwewang Dince Aisa Kodai Erfan Afandi Meiske Abdullah Moonti, Roy Marthen Nuna, Muten Oyaldi Puhi Rahmat Paneo Robby W. Amu Rustam Hs Akili Yusrianto Kadir