Bayangsari Wedhatami
Universitas Negeri Semarang

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Public Services Versus Covid-19: Participation of Villagers in Public Service based on E-Government in Pandemic Eko Mukminto; Martitah Martitah; Ratih Damayanti; Bayangsari Wedhatami
Jurnal Pengabdian Hukum Indonesia (Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement) Vol 6 No 1 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v6i1.60650

Abstract

This article aims to show how to improve public services' capability and accessibility through e-government for villagers to reduce the rate of spread and infection of Covid-19 and as community participation in alternative ways of getting public services, Electronic Government (e-Gov) or digital government exists. Electronic government (e-Gov) itself provides information and public services, business affairs, services related to governance, et cetera by using information technology tools. However, the obstacles in this e-government-based public service are in applying the information system and the knowledge and access to information on this e-government-based public service. The digital divide is found in rural communities, often uninformed and reluctant to experience new technologies. Therefore, a community service program is needed, namely Improving Community Capability and Accessibility in Utilizing E-Government Public Services for villagers in the Middle of the COVID-19 Pandemic Outbreak in Semarang Regency.
Navigating Regional Regulatory Changes in Indonesia: An In-Depth Analysis of Post-Amendment Implementation of Law Number 12 of 2011 on Legislation Formation Bayangsari Wedhatami; Ratih Damayanti; Cindy Ayu Prasasi
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): October, 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37192

Abstract

In the context of Indonesia as a State of Law, the imperative role of the rule of law cannot be overstated in realizing the state's objectives. The formulation of Legislative Regulations, essential for upholding the rule of law, necessitates meticulous consideration of three fundamental principles: benefit, justice, and legal clarity. To ensure the effectiveness of these regulations in aligning with the direction and goals of national legal development, the process adheres to key principles, encompassing the clarity of objectives, appropriate institutional involvement, congruence among types, hierarchy, and material content, practicability, clarity of formulation, and transparency. This procedural framework is consistently implemented in a sustainable, coordinated, and integrated manner. The legal landscape in Indonesia underwent significant transformations with the enactment of Law Number 11 of 2020 on Job Creation, introducing the omnibus law technique. However, the subsequent Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIII/2020 provisionally deemed this law unconstitutional. Responding to this decision, Law Number 12 of 2011 underwent a substantial amendment through Law Number 13 of 2022, specifically addressing the omnibus approach and enhancing meaningful public participation in statutory rule creation. This legal revision significantly influences the development of legal instruments at the regional level. Consequently, an examination of the implementation of regional legal product formation becomes imperative post the amendment of Law Number 12 of 2011 on the Formation of Legislative Regulations.