Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Challenges Arising from Article 22(2) of Ministerial Regulation ATR/BPN No. 6/2018 on Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) Pertaining to Insufficient or Missing Evidence of Community Land Ownership Fida Nabilah Taufiq; Mohammad Hamidi Masykur; Supriyadi Supriyadi
Unnes Law Journal Vol. 9 No. 2 (2023): October, 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ulj.v9i2.37201

Abstract

The Complete Systematic Land Registration (PTSL) program's successful implementation hinges on satisfying the physical and juridical data requirements for individual land plots owned by a single person. However, our research highlights disparities between juridical and physical data for specific land plots. Moreover, a lack of community awareness regarding the crucial role of land data collection presents significant challenges in the field. A notable obstacle, as outlined in Article 22(2) of the Regulation of the Minister of Agrarian and Spatial Planning/Head of the National Land Agency of the Republic of Indonesia No. 6 of 2018, pertains to individuals applying for land registration through the PTSL Program without fulfilling complete requirements or providing proof of land ownership. This non-compliance poses a potential catalyst for disputes during the PTSL land registration process. As of early 2017, Indonesia harbored 126,000,000 land parcels, with only 51,000,000 certified and 79,000,000 awaiting official registration, earmarked for acceleration through PTSL. Our focus on Malang Regency in East Java, spanning an expansive 3,534.86 km² or 353,486 ha, reveals its active participation in the PTSL program. Notably, the region faces a substantial PTSL quota of 55,000 land parcels in 2023, distributed across 19 villages in 5 sub-districts, marking the highest quota in East Java Province. The research also underscores the pressing need for enhanced community awareness and compliance with PTSL requirements, particularly focusing on the potential disputes arising from inadequate documentation during the land registration process.
THE LEGITIMACY OF THE REGISTERED MAIL COURT SUMMON AND ITS CHALLENGES TO THE PRINCIPLE OF CONTANTE JUSTITIE IN THE SUNGAI PENUH RELIGIOUS COURT Rizqi Aulia Muslim; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Mohammad Hamidi Masykur
International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025)
Publisher : CV. RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/ijerlas.v6i1.4518

Abstract

Summoning hearings by registered mail is a new instrument in the e-Court system designed to strengthen the principle of contante justitie as a fundamental principle of simple, fast, and low-cost justice. This study aims to analyze the basis of the legitimacy of summoning a trial through a registered letter according to positive law and examine the challenges of its implementation in practice in the Sungai Penuh Religious Court. Using a socio-legal approach, this study integrates normative analysis of PERMA Number 7 of 2022, SEMA Number 1 of 2023, and HIR/RBg provisions with empirical findings obtained through observation and interviews. The results of the study show that although normatively recorded letters have formal legitimacy as a valid and appropriate summons, their effectiveness in the field has not fully supported the fulfillment of the principle of contante justitie. Various obstacles are still found, including delays in delivery, untimely receipts, high return rates, low understanding of postal officers on procedural legal procedures, and the defendant's attendance rate, which is only in the range of 35-36 percent. This situation causes a distortion between normative and functional legitimacy in the practice of summoning hearings. This research highlights the importance of reinforcement of operational standards, improvement of the capability of PT Pos Indonesia officers, and reconstruction of legally feasible standards in the form of electronic summons for the fulfillment of the principle of continual justice in the enactment of modern justice.