Articles
            
            
            
            
            
                            
                    
                        Hak Kebebasan Berserikat Bagi Pekerja Sebagai Hak Konstitusional 
                    
                    Budiono, Abdul Rachmad                    
                     Jurnal Konstitusi  Vol 13, No 4 (2016) 
                    
                    Publisher : Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                    |
                            
                            
                                Full PDF (307.238 KB)
                            
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.31078/jk1345                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia guarantees the right of everyone to freedom of association, assembly, and to express opinions. Thus, the right of workers or labours to freedom of association is guaranteed by the Constitution. The principle which is embedded in the 1945 Constitution has been incorporated into Law Number 21 Year 2000 concerning Labour Union. The substance of the rights to freedom of association aims to give bargaining power to workers represented by the union against employers. The bargaining position of labour unions is expected to improve the functioning of the unions to defend the interest of workers.
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        The Notion of Divine Principle (Asas Ilahiah) in Indonesian Contract Law 
                    
                    Djumikasih, Djumikasih; 
Luth, Thohir; 
Budiono, Abdul Rachmad; 
Koeswahyono, Imam                    
                     Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Vol 8, No 1 (2021): Contemporary Issue in Private Law 
                    
                    Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Brawijaya 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.21776/ub.blj.2021.008.01.09                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
This study is legal research aiming to find out the essence of Divine Principles in Indonesian Contract Law from the review of the Natural Law theory, the Sunt-Servanda theory, the Awareness and Legal Obedience Grundnorm theory, and Truth theory. This research reveals that the Divine Principle's essence is the most fundamental principle or guideline derived from God but exists in humans, aiming to find the truth and regulate the parties in making agreements. The application of the Divine Principle aims to find the truth and regulate the parties in the agreement's field.  Indonesian citizens could realize and practice the Precepts of Godhead in their agreement activities. In establishing the agreement, the parties are applying the teachings of their respective religions. This study reveals that the Divine principle needs to be incorporated into one of the upcoming National Agreement Laws principles, especially in the contract born because of the agreement. This study maintains that the divine principle can be applied comprehensively for Indonesian citizens who are parties to the agreement, not only limited to the Indonesian Muslim citizens.
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        Hak Kebebasan Berserikat Bagi Pekerja Sebagai Hak Konstitusional 
                    
                    Abdul Rachmad Budiono                    
                     Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 4 (2016) 
                    
                    Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                    |
                            
                            
                                Full PDF (307.238 KB)
                            
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.31078/jk1345                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia guarantees the right of everyone to freedom of association, assembly, and to express opinions. Thus, the right of workers or labours to freedom of association is guaranteed by the Constitution. The principle which is embedded in the 1945 Constitution has been incorporated into Law Number 21 Year 2000 concerning Labour Union. The substance of the rights to freedom of association aims to give bargaining power to workers represented by the union against employers. The bargaining position of labour unions is expected to improve the functioning of the unions to defend the interest of workers.
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli lelang yang tidak menerima objek lelang dalam masa penyerahan 
                    
                    Natalia Maria Liju; 
Abdul Rachmad Budiono                    
                     Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 12, No 3 (2021): December 2021 
                    
                    Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7095                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
This study discusses what if it turns out that the object of the auction, when its obligations have been paid off by the buyer, is not appropriate? If there is a legal vacuum, then what can be done to protect buyer rights? This research was made in order to answer questions like this, and then to be able to provide legal certainty and also legal protection for the parties involved in the auction. This research method is normative juridical. The approach used is a statutory approach (Statute Approach) and a concept approach (Conceptual Approach). Auction is a direct public sale that has long been known in Indonesia. However, until now the legislation regarding auctions is very minimal. Auctions in Indonesia are still using the Vendu Regulation Number 1908 Number 189, and then directly regulated using the Regulation of the Minister of Finance such as Regulation of the Minister of Finance Number 27 of 2016 concerning Instructions for Auction Implementation. This has resulted in a legal vacuum in some matters regarding auctions. One of them is if the object of the auction submitted during the later delivery is not appropriate. Because this is not regulated in the existing laws and regulations, it results in legal uncertainty for the auction buyer.How to cite item: Liju, N., Budiono, R. (2021). Perlindungan hukum terhadap pembeli lelang yang tidak menerima objek lelang dalam masa penyerahan. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 12(3), 303-313. doi:https://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v12i3.7095.
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        PELAKSANAAN EKSEKUSI JAMINAN HAK TANGGUNGAN DALAM PENYELESAIAN KREDIT MACET DI LEMBAGA PERBANKAN 
                    
                    Adi Widjaja; 
Abdul Rachmad Budiono; 
Bambang Winarno                    
                     Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 3, No 1 (2018): Juni 2018 
                    
                    Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                    |
                            
                            
                                Full PDF (168.149 KB)
                            
                                                                    
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
Dengan diundangkannya Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang “Hak Tanggungan atas tanah beserta benda-benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah”, maka lembaga jaminan Hak Tanggungan dapat memberikan suatu kepastian hukum tentang pengikatan jaminan dengan tanah dan benda-benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah sebagai jaminan dalam Lembaga Perbankan. Sehingga bilamana terjadi kredit macet maka Lembaga Jaminan Hak Tanggungan diharapkan mampu memberikan solusi penyelesaian kredit macet bagi Lembaga Perbankan. Dalam menghadapi debitor yang wanprestasi/ingkar janji sehingga menimbulkan kredit macet, maka Bank dapat melakukan upaya penyelesaian kredit macet dengan menggunakan Lembaga Jaminan Hak Tanggungan atas tanah, dengan cara melaksanakan eksekusi terhadap jaminan yang telah dibebani Hak Tanggungan. Bahwa dalam praktek Lembaga Perbankan, untuk Bank Perkreditan Rakyat (BPR) juga memberikan kredit kepada para nasabahnya dengan jaminan berupa tanah dan/atau bangunan yang diikat dengan menggunakan Hak Tanggungan. Kredit kepada para nasabahnya dengan jaminan berupa tanah dan/atau bangunan yang diikat dengan Hak Tanggungan juga dilaksanakan di BPR Puridana Arthamas di kabupaten Sidoarjo dan BPR Armindo Kencana di kota Malang. Bahwa pada BPR juga terjadi beberapa debitor melakukan wanprestasi sehingga mengakibatkan kualitas kredit atau Kualitas Aktiva Produktif menjadi kredit macet. Dengan adanya kredit macet tersebut maka pihak BPR mengupayakan pengembalian atas kredit yang telah disalurkan dengan cara melaksanakan eksekusi Hak Tanggungan terhadap obyek jaminan yang telah diikat dan dibebani Hak Tanggungan. Cara pelaksanaan eksekusi adalah dengan cara Penjualan Di Bawah Tangan, eksekusi berdasarkan Parate Eksekusi dan eksekusi berdasarkan Titel Eksekutorial. Kendala yang menjadi penghambat dalam pelaksanaan eksekusi obyek Hak Tanggungan adalah timbulnya beberapa permasalahan hukum tertentu, yaitu adanya sita, sengketa atau gugatan hukum.DOI: http: //dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v3i12018p001
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        ANALISA PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI PEMEGANG SAHAM MINORITAS DALAM PROSES AKUISISI BERDASARKAN PASAL 126 UNDANG-UNDANG NOMOR 40 TAHUN 2007 
                    
                    Maya Sari; 
Abdul Rachmad Budiono; 
Hanif Nur Widhiyanti                    
                     Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 2, No 2 (2017): Desember 2017 
                    
                    Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                    |
                            
                            
                                Full PDF (69.485 KB)
                            
                                                                    
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
Abstract: This paper aim to analyze the legal implications of legal conflicts between Article 126 paragraph 1 and paragraph 3 of UUPT.Article 126 paragraph (1) of Law no. 40 of 2007 regarding Limited Liability Company (UUPT) states that the acquisition process should consider the interests of minority shareholders. But in article 126 paragraph (3) UUPT that the business undertaken by minority shareholders under Article 62 UUPT does not stop the acquisition process. It appears that the UUPT has not yet provided legal protection for minority shareholders and there is a legal conflict between Article 126 paragraph (1) of the Company Law which wishes to provide legal protection to minority shareholders and paragraph (3) of the article which illustrates that the shareholders' Minorities do not stop the acquisition process. By approach of legislation and case approach, the result is that there is no legal certainty over legal efforts by minority shareholders in using the voting rights in accordance with the shares they hold when the minority shareholders do not approve the acquisition. UUPT has not provided clear legal protection for minority shareholders so that in the process of acquisition of minority shareholders is impairedAbstrak: Tulisan ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi hukum terhadap konflik hukum antara pasal 126 ayat 1 dan ayat 3 dari UUPT. Pasal 126 ayat (1) UU No. 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas (UUPT) menyatakan bahwa proses akuisisi harus memperhatikan kepentingan pemegang saham minoritas. Tetapi pada Pasal 126 ayat (3) UUPT tersebut menyatakan bahwa usaha yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas berdasarkan Pasal 62 UUPT tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Terlihat belum konsistennya UUPT memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi pemegang saham minoritas dan terlihat adanya konflik hukum antara Pasal 126 ayat (1) UUPT yang ingin memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada pemegang saham minoritas dan ayat (3) dari pasal tersebut yang menggambarkan bahwa upaya hukum yang dilakukan pemegang saham minoritas tidak menghentikan proses akuisisi. Kajian menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan kasus diperoleh hasil bahwa tidak adanya kepastian hukum atas upaya hukum yang dilakukan  pemegang saham  minoritas  dalam  menggunakan  hak  suara  sesuai  dengan saham yang dimilikinya  ketika pemegang saham minoritas tidak menyetujui dilakukannya akuisisi. UUPT belum memberikan perlindungan hukum yang jelas bagi pemegang saham minoritas sehingga dalam proses akuisisi pemegang saham minoritas dirugikan DOI : http://dx.doi.org/10.17977/um019v2i22017p115
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        Politik Hukum Perubahan Norma Perizinan dan Iklim Investasi Dalam Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Menggunakan Metode Omnibus Law 
                    
                    Angga Dwi Prasetyo; 
Abdul Rachmad Budiono; 
Shinta Hadiyantina                    
                     Media Iuris Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): MEDIA IURIS 
                    
                    Publisher : Universitas Airlangga 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.20473/mi.v5i2.36165                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
AbstractThe Job Creation Law passed and enacted in 2020 is a momentual result with the expectation that the Law will create jobs. But after the passage of the Job Creation Law with the use of the omnibus law method, it produced various responses and reactions from the community so that the community also among academics produced pros and cons to the Law. In addition, after the Uncang-Cipta Kerja Law was passed, it has had an impact on the elimination of industries included in the negative investment list, triggering an increase in foreign investment in Indonesia. Based on the description, a problem was formulated: what is the legal politics behind the change in licensing norms and the investment climate in the Job Creation Law using the omnibus law method. The research method used in the writing of this article is the use of legal normative research. The source of legal materials used includes 3 (three) types of legal materials, namely primary legal materials, secondary legal materials, and tertiary legal materials. Legal data collection techniques use a literature research model that analyzes the legal data studied in the form of qualitative and descriptive content analysis. The results showed that the government’s efforts to reduce duplication of regulations through comprehensive legislation are expected to accelerate licensing.Keywords: Omnibus Law; UU Cipta Kerja; Licensing; Investment. AbstrakUndang-Undang Cipta Kerja yang disahkan dan diundangkan pada tahun 2020 merupakan suatu hasil momentual dengan harapan dari Undang-Undang tersebut ialah menciptakan lapangan kerja. Tetapi pasca pengesahan Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja dengan penggunaan metode omnibus law tersebut menghasilkan berbagai tanggapan dan reaksi dari lapisan masyarakat sehingga masyarakat pun juga dikalangan akademisi menghasilkan pro kontra terhadap Undang-undang tersebut. Selain itu, pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja disahkan telah berdampak pada penghapusan industri yang masuk dalam daftar negatif investasi sehingga memicu peningkatan investasi asing di Indonesia. Berdasarkan uraian tersebut, dirumuskan masalah: apa politik hukum dibalik perubahan norma perizinan dan iklim investasi dalam UU Cipta kerja menggunakan metode omnibus law. Metode penelitian yang dipakai pada penulisan artikel ini ialah penggunaan penelitian normatif hukum. Sumber bahan hukum yang digunakan meliputi 3 (tiga) jenis bahan hukum, yakni materi hukum primer, materi hukum sekunder, serta materi hukum tersier. Teknik pengumpulan data hukum menggunakan model penelitian kepustakaan yang menganalisis data hukum yang diteliti berupa analisis isi kualitatif dan deskriptif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa upaya pemerintah untuk mengurangi duplikasi regulasi melalui undang-undang yang komprehensif diharapkan dapat mempercepat perizinan.Kata Kunci: Omnibus Law; UU Cipta Kerja; Perizinan; Investasi.
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        Hak Kebebasan Berserikat Bagi Pekerja Sebagai Hak Konstitusional 
                    
                    Abdul Rachmad Budiono                    
                     Jurnal Konstitusi Vol 13, No 4 (2016) 
                    
                    Publisher : The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                    |
                            
                            
                                Full PDF (307.238 KB)
                            
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.31078/jk1345                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
Article 28E paragraph (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia guarantees the right of everyone to freedom of association, assembly, and to express opinions. Thus, the right of workers or labours to freedom of association is guaranteed by the Constitution. The principle which is embedded in the 1945 Constitution has been incorporated into Law Number 21 Year 2000 concerning Labour Union. The substance of the rights to freedom of association aims to give bargaining power to workers represented by the union against employers. The bargaining position of labour unions is expected to improve the functioning of the unions to defend the interest of workers.
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        Job Loss Guarantee Program Policy as Legal Protection for Terminated Workers Based on Job Creation Law Article 46 
                    
                    Try Wahyu Widanarti; 
Abdul Rachmad Budiono; 
Budi Santoso                    
                     Yuridika Vol. 37 No. 2 (2022): Volume 37 No 2 May 2022 
                    
                    Publisher : Universitas Airlangga 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v37i2.37452                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
To provide legal protection for workers who have experienced termination of employment, the government of Indonesia has issued a new policy in the form of Article 46 of Law No. 11 of 2020 concerning the Job Creation Law. This increases the type of protection for social security programs, namely the job loss guarantee program. This paper uses a juridical-normative research method. The results indicate that the legal protection policy for workers affected by termination of employment was not appropriate. Therefore, an amendment was made to Law Number 40 of 2004 concerning the National Social Security System. Specifically, Article 46A of the Job Creation Law states: "Workers or employees who have their activities terminated are entitled to collateral due to loss of profession." Article 46C(2) also states that the Central Authority should pay the professional burnout insurance contributions. In this case, non-professional collateral benefits are not focused on money but on cash, access to actionable market data, and job training. It is not explained in detail what percentage of the total compensation will be obtained by workers affected by termination of employment through this job loss guarantee scheme. This is only stated in Article 46D paragraph (2), "Job loss guarantee will be provided for 6 (six) months of wages."
                            
                         
                     
                 
                
                            
                    
                        Kewenangan pejabat lelang kelas II terhadap minuta risalah lelang yang lebih batas waktu 
                    
                    Hartina Ruth Manora; 
Abdul Rachmad Budiono; 
Endang Sri Kawuryan                    
                     Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Vol 13, No 1 (2022): April 2022 
                    
                    Publisher : University of Merdeka Malang 
                    
                         Show Abstract
                        | 
                             Download Original
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Original Source
                            
                        
                        | 
                            
                                Check in Google Scholar
                            
                        
                                                                                    
                            | 
                                DOI: 10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7096                            
                                            
                    
                        
                            
                            
                                
This study aims to determine the position of the minutes of auction minutes after 30 years and the authority of the Auction Officer after the minutes are kept for 30 years. The Minutes of the Minutes of Auction Deed are authentic deeds and have perfect evidentiary power for the parties. In Article 92 paragraphs (3) and (4) of the Regulation of the Minister of Finance (PerMenKeu) Number 27/PMK.06/2016 concerning Auction Implementation Guidelines, it is stated that the minimum period of storage for the Minutes of Auction Deed is 30 years. The position of the minutes of auction minutes that have been kept for 30 years or more, if it is related to the juridical age of the authentic deed, then the position of the minutes of the auction minutes that have been kept for 30 years remains valid as legal evidence. Minutes of Auction made by the Class II Auction Officer are kept at the Class II Auction Officer's Office for 30 years so that the Class II Auction Officer is authorized to make a copy/quote/Grosse after 30 years and is not liable for the minutes of the auction minutes. In terms of enforcing the rights of the parties concerned and requiring the Minutes of Auction that have been kept for 30 years, the parties concerned may take legal action by submitting a request for a court order.How to cite item: Manora, H., Budiono, A., Kawuryan, E. (2022). Kewenangan pejabat lelang kelas II terhadap minuta risalah lelang yang lebih batas waktu. Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum, 13(1), 96-106. DOIhttps://doi.org/10.26905/idjch.v13i1.7096.