Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.659
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Unes Law Review Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities
Merlin Theodor Handayani Samosir
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
Analisis Pengaruh Tradisi Kawin Tangkap Di Sumba Terhadap Hak Asasi Perempuan Naomi Femilia; Salsabila Putri Zahra Nasution; Merlin Theodor Handayani Samosir; Adisty Padmavati Nazwa Moha; Dandi Herdiawan Syahputra; Jeane Neltje Selly
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (September 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1023

Abstract

Kawin tangkap merupakan tradisi adat di Sumba yang keberadaannya masih diakui hingga saat ini, tradisi ini dilakukan dengan cara menangkap perempuan yang ingin dikawinkan dengan syarat yaitu telah memperoleh persetujuan baik dari pihak perempuan maupun dari pihak keluarga perempuan. Akan tetapi, aturan kawin tangkap berubah seiring waktu dimana pihak laki-laki menangkap perempuan yang ingin dijadikan sebagai istri tanpa diketahui oleh pihak perempuan dan keluarganya. Hal ini tentu saja merampas hak asasi perempuan dan tentu telah menjadi pelanggaran bahkan dapat menjadi tindak pidana yang dapat dijerat hukum.
The Fulfillment of Diversion in Cases of Participation in Assault Resulting in Death by Children Merlin Theodor Handayani Samosir; R. Rahaditya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1022

Abstract

The increasing number of crimes involving children, the diversion approach is a major concern as an alternative in the juvenile criminal justice system that should be prioritized as mandated by Law No. 11/2012 on Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), which emphasizes peaceful conflict resolution between juvenile offenders and victims. However, this process can be complicated when the victim's family does not accept an amicable settlement. Although peace efforts were achieved between the victim's family and the offender's parents, the difference in sentences between the defendants triggered dissatisfaction and violation of the initial agreement, posing a dilemma in the implementation of diversion. This study highlights the application of diversion in the case resolved in Decision Number 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Jmb, where the peace process between the victim's family and the perpetrator faced challenges, although an agreement was reached. This research uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analysis of legal sources, including laws, journals, and court decisions. The analysis shows that, although diversion is mandatory in juvenile cases, material compensation is not. Its success depends heavily on the willingness of the parties involved to reach a fair and binding agreement so as not to create dilemmas in its implementation. This study recommends refining the diversion mechanism to address conflicts arising from disagreements between the parties in cases of children in conflict with the law.
The Fulfillment of Diversion in Cases of Participation in Assault Resulting in Death by Children Merlin Theodor Handayani Samosir; R. Rahaditya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i2.1022

Abstract

The increasing number of crimes involving children, the diversion approach is a major concern as an alternative in the juvenile criminal justice system that should be prioritized as mandated by Law No. 11/2012 on Juvenile Criminal Justice System (UU SPPA), which emphasizes peaceful conflict resolution between juvenile offenders and victims. However, this process can be complicated when the victim's family does not accept an amicable settlement. Although peace efforts were achieved between the victim's family and the offender's parents, the difference in sentences between the defendants triggered dissatisfaction and violation of the initial agreement, posing a dilemma in the implementation of diversion. This study highlights the application of diversion in the case resolved in Decision Number 9/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Jmb, where the peace process between the victim's family and the perpetrator faced challenges, although an agreement was reached. This research uses a normative juridical method with descriptive analysis of legal sources, including laws, journals, and court decisions. The analysis shows that, although diversion is mandatory in juvenile cases, material compensation is not. Its success depends heavily on the willingness of the parties involved to reach a fair and binding agreement so as not to create dilemmas in its implementation. This study recommends refining the diversion mechanism to address conflicts arising from disagreements between the parties in cases of children in conflict with the law.
Co-Authors Adisty Padmavati Nazwa Moha Dandi Herdiawan Syahputra Jeane Neltje Selly Naomi Femilia R. Rahaditya Salsabila Putri Zahra Nasution