This Author published in this journals
All Journal Yustisia JHCLS
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Reform and Breakthrough in Business Regulations for Empowering MSMEs in Indonesia and the Netherlands Agus Riwanto; Sukarni Suryaningsih; Delasari Krisda Putri
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol 3, No 3 (2023): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Lembaga Contrarius Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v3i3.109

Abstract

There are too many overlapping MSMEs determination policies which result in hampering MSMEs empowerment. The dynamics of global change require a fast and responsive response because, without policy reformulation, economic growth will stagnate or even slow down. This article delves into the necessity of regulatory reform to enhance the ease of doing business for MSMEs, using the Omnibus Law method. Conducted as normative legal research, this study uses normative legal research and analyzes secondary data to examine the existing challenges. The findings reveal various obstacles faced by MSMEs, including complexities in obtaining business licenses, cumbersome tax payment systems, limited access to business capital, and the absence of a formal business entity. To address these regulatory issues, alternative solutions are proposed through the Omnibus Law method, emphasizing the simplification of regulations, fostering public participation, and harmonizing both vertical and horizontal regulations. Moreover, drawing lessons from the Netherlands, where the government established the Dutch Advisory Board on Regulatory Burdens (ATR) to reduce administrative burdens on SMEs, Indonesia can prioritize similar measures to simplify regulations and lower costs. By emulating the ATR's independent and collaborative approach, Indonesia has the potential to establish its own advisory body, fostering a supportive business environment for SMEs and promoting economic growth.
KORELASI PENGATURAN SISTEM PEMILU PROPORSIONAL TERBUKA BERBASIS SUARA TERBANYAK DENGAN KORUPSI POLITIK DI INDONESIA Agus Riwanto
Yustisia Vol 4, No 1: April 2015
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v4i1.8624

Abstract

AbstractThis research is aimed at studying and exploring about the relationship between the arrangement of election system adopted in Act No 8 Year 2012 on the election for the members of DPR, DPD and DPRD in 2014 general election and  the practice of political corruption. The research is socio-legal research which integrates law norm with sociological aspect, applying approach method which put law principles and policial attitude. The result of the research shows that there is a positive correlation between the arrangement of open list proportional election with most number base and political corruption. As this system is highly cost, the candidates of legislative member happen to conduct deceitfulness in the election or what is classified as money politic to get support of the voters. The motive of political corruption conducted by the member of DPR and DPRD is to get back the high cost during the election. The renewal model of the election arrangement to creating political anti-corruption is through purifying proportional election system by applying close list proportional system with serial number base. AbstrakPenelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji dan mendalami tentang hubungan pengaturan sistem pemilu yang diadopsi dalam UU No. 8 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pemilu Anggota DPR, DPD dan DPRD pada pemilu tahun 2014 dengan praktek korupsi politik. Penelitian ini merupakan jenis penelitian sosio-legal yang menggabungkan norma hukum dengan aspek sosiologis dengan menggunakan metode pendekatan asas-asas hukum dan perilaku politik. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan, bahwa pengaturan sistem pemilu proporsional terbuka (open list) berbasis suara terbanyak berkorelasi positif terhadap pratek korupsi politik. Karena sistem pemilu ini berbiaya mahal, akibatnya calon anggota legislatif melakukan aneka model kecurangan dalam pemilu yang dikualifikasikan sebagai praktek politik uang untuk mendapat dukungan pemilih. Motif korupsi politik yang dilakukan oleh anggota DPR dan DPRD adalah mengembalikan biaya mahal yang dikeluarkan saat pemilu. Model pembaruan pengaturan sistem pemilu untuk menciptakan pemilu antikorupsi politik adalah memurnikan sistem pemilu proporsional dengan merubah model pengaturan sistem proporsional terbuka terbatas (close list) dengan berbasis nomor urut.