Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.408
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Muhammad Daffa Rianto
Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta, Indonesia
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 363 AYAT 1 KE-4 (PUTUSAN NOMOR 50/PID.B/2020/PN.JKT.TIM) Muhammad Daffa Rianto; Fachri Bey
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol. 4 No. 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (262.699 KB) | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i1.13419

Abstract

Research findings on the crime of theft based on Fourth paragraph of Article 363. The current passage hardly complies with the Criminal Code's Article 363 paragraph 1 fifth. At the time of the aforementioned crime, which was committed with the participant's assistance rather than using the forged-based key described in Article 100 of the Criminal Code, law enforcement officials were not aware of modern technology. Because perpetrating a theft necessitates entering a specific location that qualifies for inclusion, i.e., a theft that is carried out by two or more people (Decision No. 50/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Jkt.Tim). The method of statistical analysis used to create scientific work in this case is normative statistical analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, data collection through literature studies, and statistical analysis using a qualitative approach so that the author can conclude that. The judge asserts that the 5th article 363 paragraph (1) is incorrect because.
TINDAK PIDANA PENCURIAN BERDASARKAN PASAL 363 AYAT 1 KE-4 (PUTUSAN NOMOR 50/PID.B/2020/PN.JKT.TIM) Muhammad Daffa Rianto; Fachri Bey
Reformasi Hukum Trisakti Vol 4 No 1 (2022): Reformasi Hukum Trisakti
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Trisakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25105/refor.v4i1.13419

Abstract

Research findings on the crime of theft based on Fourth paragraph of Article 363. The current passage hardly complies with the Criminal Code's Article 363 paragraph 1 fifth. At the time of the aforementioned crime, which was committed with the participant's assistance rather than using the forged-based key described in Article 100 of the Criminal Code, law enforcement officials were not aware of modern technology. Because perpetrating a theft necessitates entering a specific location that qualifies for inclusion, i.e., a theft that is carried out by two or more people (Decision No. 50/Pid.B/2020/Pn.Jkt.Tim). The method of statistical analysis used to create scientific work in this case is normative statistical analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, data collection through literature studies, and statistical analysis using a qualitative approach so that the author can conclude that. The judge asserts that the 5th article 363 paragraph (1) is incorrect because.
Co-Authors Fachri Bey