Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search

Violation of Legal Certainty in the Sale and Purchase Deed made by the Land Deed Officer (PPAT) Devarinta Hayyu Anandari; Adi Sulistyono; Suraji Suraji
West Science Law and Human Rights Vol. 1 No. 04 (2023): West Science Law and Human Rights
Publisher : Westscience Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58812/wslhr.v1i04.327

Abstract

The regional revenue Office (Bapenda) and the Land Office apply the inclusion of Bapenda's appraisal price in the Sale and Purchase Deed made by the Land Deed Making Officer (PPAT). If this happens, then there will be no legal certainty for the parties. This happens mainly because the PPAT Sale and Purchase Deed is an authentic deed and has an important role in proving civil cases, especially if there is a dispute in court. Authentic Deeds have the highest position as documentary evidence in civil cases, below which are private deeds and unilateral deeds or unilateral confessions. The evidentiary value of an authentic deed based on Article 1870 of the Civil Code is perfect (volledig bewijskracht) and binding (bindede bewijskracht). This has consequences, whatever is stated in the authentic deed must be considered true and valid. Apart from that, the contents and statements contained therein are true.
Keabsahan Perjanjian Paylater (Bayar Nanti) Pada Aplikasi Gojek Menurut KUH Perdata Tiara Iga Mandera; Suraji Suraji
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): March: Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i2.105

Abstract

This study aims to determine the validity of the agreement between Gopay Later according to the Indonesian Civil Code. This research is a normative juridical legal study with a legislative approach. Based on this research, it is found that the electronic agreement of Gopay Later between consumers and PT. Multifinance Anak Bangsa (Gojek) can be considered valid according to Indonesian contract law and does not contradict the Indonesian Civil Code.
Pertanggungjawaban Notaris Dalam Mengungkapkan Pemilik Manfaat (Beneficial Owner) Pada Pendirian Perusahaan Bimo Kusumo Putro Indarto; Suraji Suraji
Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora Vol. 1 No. 4 (2024): July : Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/aliansi.v1i4.309

Abstract

This article aims to examine the Role and Responsibility of Notary Related to Disclosing Beneficial Owner Information in Company Establishment. This research is a prescriptive normative legal research, using the statutory approach method and conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary and secondary legal sources, which are analyzed through literature study of documents or library materials, and interpreted using deductive reasoning techniques and syllogism. The result to be achieved is that the notary is responsible for recording and identifying the beneficial owner. The notary is responsible in this capacity for ascertaining the identity of the beneficial owners and ensuring that all information related to them is correctly and accurately recorded in the company's official documents. In addition to ensuring recording accuracy, notaries are also responsible for reporting beneficial owner information to the Ministry of Law and Human Rights through online reporting systems such as AHU Online and the Administration System for Legal Entities (SABH).
Urgensi Penyuluhan Masyarakat tentang Peralihan Hak atas Tanah untuk Mengurangi Sengketa Kepemilikan Hak atas Tanah Devarinta Hayyu Anandari; Adi Sulistiyono; Suraji Suraji
Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 1 (2023): Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pengabdian Masyarakat
Publisher : CV. Dharma Samakta Edukhatulistiwa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.61142/psnpm.v1.95

Abstract

Banyaknya sengketa dibidang pertanahan menimbulkan pertanyaan tentang kesadaran Masyarakat dalam mengurus legalitas peralihan hak atas tanah. Masyarakat seringkali enggan dan menunda untuk mengurus legilitas peralihan hak atas tanah karena beberapa alasan, seperti ketidaktahuannya tentang cara mengurusnya, mempercayakan kepada calo, terkendala biaya pajak, dan sebagainya. Padahal dengan menunda mengurus legalitas peralihan hak atas tanah tersebut malah dapat merugikan dan meningkatkan kemungkinan terjadinya sengketa. Terbitnya Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 24 Tahun 1997 tentang Pendaftaran Tanah menjadikan awal berlakunya kewajiban Pendaftaran peralihan hak atas tanah wajib dilakukan dihadapan Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT) dan didaftarkan di Kantor Pertanahan setempat. Pendaftaran Hak Atas Tanah berlaku asas publisitas, yang mana Peralihan Hak atas tanah barulah sah setelah didaftarkan di Kantor Pertanahan setempat. Namun walaupun 26 tahun telah berlalu sejak berlakuknya PP Pendaftaran Tanah, masih banyak masyarakat yang enggan untuk mengurus legalitas peralihan hak atas tanah. Untuk itu, para stakeholder dibidang pertanahan seharusnya terjun dan bekerjasama untuk melakukan penyuluhan yang masif tentang pendaftaran tanah.