Muhammad Zaki Tamami
İslam Ilimleri, Selçuk Üniversitesi, Turkiye

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

A Comparative Analysis of Abū Ḥanīfa’s and Imām Mālik’s Views on Nikāḥ Taḥlīl Muh. Syakur; Sarmiyati; Muhammad Zaki Tamami; Sumarjoko
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2024: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v2i2.616

Abstract

This study examines the legal perspectives on nikah muhallil (or nikah tahlil) according to Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Malik, highlighting the differences in their jurisprudential methodologies and ethical considerations. Nikah muhallil refers to a marriage conducted to render a woman lawful for her first husband after she has been divorced three times (talāq thalāthah). Using a qualitative doctrinal and comparative approach, this research analyzes classical fiqh texts, prophetic traditions (hadith), and scholarly interpretations to understand the reasoning behind each scholar’s position. The findings indicate that Imam Abu Hanifah permits nikah muhallil under certain conditions, emphasizing the validity of the marriage contract even if conditional terms are attached, while considering the intention of the second husband as relevant to the moral evaluation. In contrast, Imam Malik strictly prohibits marriages arranged solely to circumvent the prohibition of returning to a former spouse, asserting that such acts invalidate the contract and are morally equivalent to zina (fornication/adultery).The study concludes that both approaches, though differing in legal reasoning and ethical emphasis, contribute to the development of Islamic family law by balancing formal legal validity with moral and spiritual considerations. This comparative analysis provides insight into how classical juristic methodologies can inform contemporary applications of Islamic marital law.
The Role of GKMNU in Reducing Stunting in Glapansari Village, Temanggung: An Analysis of Maqashid al-Shariah Eka Mahargiani Rokhma; Sumarjoko; Yuda Ardian; Muhammad Zaki Tamami
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v4i1.698

Abstract

This study analyzes and evaluates the role of the Nahdlatul Ulama Family Welfare Movement (GKMNU) in Glapansari Village, Temanggung, in addressing the high prevalence of stunting as an effort to achieve the objectives of Maqashid al-Shariah, particularly the protection of future generations (hifz al-nasl). This village was selected because it has the highest stunting rate in Temanggung Regency, which negatively affects children’s growth and development. GKMNU implements a comprehensive program based on religious values, including health and nutrition counseling for pregnant women, education on Islamic parenting patterns, and spiritual strengthening. GKMNU views stunting as a complex issue requiring not only medical intervention but also religious and moral guidance, in line with the principle of protecting offspring within Maqashid al-Shariah. The program also supports the prevention of early marriage by referring to Law No. 16 of 2019, which stipulates the minimum marriage age of 19 years, aiming to protect children and ensure family sustainability. Despite challenges such as limited nutritional awareness, economic constraints, and cultural barriers, the findings emphasize that the synergy of GKMNU as an agent of social change and a facilitator of programs integrating religious values with national legal regulations is essential for creating healthy and dignified families in a sustainable manner. This family-based approach involving all family members is considered effective in preventing stunting.
The Implications of Muhkamat and Mutasyabihat in the Interpretation of the Qur'an Mohammad ‘Ulyan; Nur Rofiq; Muhammad Zaki Tamami
Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner Vol. 2 No. 3 Juli 2023: Amorti: Jurnal Studi Islam Interdisipliner
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/amorti.v2i3.119

Abstract

Many people interpret the verses of the Koran just by reading the translation. It is very possible for errors to occur in interpreting the Koran. Muslims who only learn religious knowledge from social media to the phenomenon of the 'impromptu ustadz' who may not really understand Islam in depth. They only have skills in public speaking or the ability to speak in public. Therefore, the understanding of the science of interpretation of the Koran must be studied perfectly. One of the efforts in understanding the interpretation of the Koran is knowing the verses of muhkamat and mutasyabihat. Research conducted by the author uses qualitative methods with a research literature approach. The locus of research in this article focuses on the science of the Koran, especially in relation to muhkamat and mutasyabihat in relation to the interpretation of the Koran. The source of the data in this study comes from the literature relating to muhkamat and mutasyabihat. Data collection techniques in this study using library techniques. The results of this study display data about the meaning of muhkamat and mutasyabihat, the opinion of the clergy and the wisdom of the verses of muhkamat and mutasyabihat. Scholars differ in their interpretation of mutasyabihat verses. The salaf scholars are of the opinion that no one knows about mutasyabih except Allah and humans only believe in it. Whereas khalaf scholars argue that people who in their knowledge know about mutasyabih takwil.