Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.61
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Muh. Syakur
INISNU Temanggung, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

 1 
The The Legal Ruling on the Sale of Animal Manure in the Shāfiʿī and Ḥanafī Schools of Islamic Law Asyharul Muala; Muh. Syakur; Mashun Adib; Hasman Zhafiri Muhammad
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 3 No. 2 December 2025: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v3i2.591

Abstract

Artikel ini mengkaji praktik perdagangan kotoran hewan (najāsah) sebagai pupuk organik dari perspektif mazhab fiqih Syafi'i dan Hanafi. Studi ini menemukan bahwa transaksi semacam itu banyak dipraktikkan di Kabupaten Temanggung, di mana kotoran hewan umum digunakan untuk memupuk berbagai tanaman pertanian. Terlepas dari prevalensinya, praktik ini telah menimbulkan perdebatan ilmiah. Imam al-Syafi'i berpendapat bahwa penjualan zat najis (al-najāsah) tidak sah, karena objek penjualan harus suci (ṭāhir). Namun, para ahli hukum Syafi'i kemudian (al-Syafi'iyyah) mengusulkan pendekatan alternatif dengan mengizinkan pengalihan kepemilikan zat najis melalui perjanjian berbasis pertukaran yang tidak merupakan kontrak jual beli formal (ʿaqd al-bayʿ). Sebaliknya, mazhab Hanafi memperbolehkan penjualan barang najis dengan alasan barang tersebut memiliki manfaat nyata dan berguna (manfa'ah). Berdasarkan perspektif hukum tersebut, penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa perdagangan pupuk kandang di Kabupaten Temanggung sah secara hukum, sesuai dengan pendapat mazhab Hanafi dan pendapat para ahli hukum Syafi'i yang memperbolehkan transaksi yang melibatkan zat najis yang menghasilkan manfaat praktis.
A Critique of the Tradition of Qurbani Meat Distribution in Temanggung from the Perspective of Shāfiʿī Fiqh Muh. Syakur; Marsudin; Muhammed Zaki Tamami; Sumarjoko
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 2 No. 1 June 2024: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v2i1.610

Abstract

The tradition of distributing sacrificial meat in Sidoharjo Village, Candiroto District, Temanggung Regency, begins with the sacrificial shohibul coming to the slaughterer to slaughter the sacrificial animal on Eid al-Adha. The head of the sacrificial animal must be given to the slaughterer as wages (ujrah) for his slaughtering services. This tradition has been carried out since ancient times, under the pretext of not burdening the sacrificial shohibul in paying wages to the slaughterer. This study aims to find out more about the implementation of the tradition of distributing sacrificial animal meat in Sidoharjo Village, Candiroto District, Temanggung Regency. And to find out the review of Syafi'i jurisprudence on this matter. This research is field research, using descriptive qualitative methods, by collecting, analyzing and interpreting data. Data collection techniques were carried out using primary data obtained from interviews with research subjects. Secondary data sources were obtained from books, journals, theses and articles. Data collection and analysis is carried out to obtain the existing reality. The results of the research found that the Syafi'i School of Islamic Scholars agree that it is haram to give wages to the slaughterer from the body parts of the sacrificial animal. Such as meat, skin, head or something else. The sacrificial service basically aims to offer devotion to Allah SWT, so the sacrificial meat should be given in charity to those who are entitled to it and to obtain blessings, it is sunnah for the sacrificial shohibul to eat the sacrificial meat in moderation.
A Comparative Analysis of Abū Ḥanīfa’s and Imām Mālik’s Views on Nikāḥ Taḥlīl Muh. Syakur; Sarmiyati; Muhammad Zaki Tamami; Sumarjoko
Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam Vol. 2 No. 2 December 2024: Jurnal Syariah, Hukum, dan Ekonomi Islam
Publisher : Yayasan Azhar Amanaa Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59944/jshei.v2i2.616

Abstract

This study examines the legal perspectives on nikah muhallil (or nikah tahlil) according to Imam Abu Hanifah and Imam Malik, highlighting the differences in their jurisprudential methodologies and ethical considerations. Nikah muhallil refers to a marriage conducted to render a woman lawful for her first husband after she has been divorced three times (talāq thalāthah). Using a qualitative doctrinal and comparative approach, this research analyzes classical fiqh texts, prophetic traditions (hadith), and scholarly interpretations to understand the reasoning behind each scholar’s position. The findings indicate that Imam Abu Hanifah permits nikah muhallil under certain conditions, emphasizing the validity of the marriage contract even if conditional terms are attached, while considering the intention of the second husband as relevant to the moral evaluation. In contrast, Imam Malik strictly prohibits marriages arranged solely to circumvent the prohibition of returning to a former spouse, asserting that such acts invalidate the contract and are morally equivalent to zina (fornication/adultery).The study concludes that both approaches, though differing in legal reasoning and ethical emphasis, contribute to the development of Islamic family law by balancing formal legal validity with moral and spiritual considerations. This comparative analysis provides insight into how classical juristic methodologies can inform contemporary applications of Islamic marital law.
Co-Authors Asyharul Muala Hasman Zhafiri Muhammad Marsudin Mashun Adib Muhammad Zaki Tamami Muhammed Zaki Tamami Sarmiyati Sumarjoko