Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Pemutakhiran Hukum Perizinan Berusaha yang Terstruktur dari Sudut Pandang Pemerintah Provinsi Daerah Khusus Ibukota Jakarta Mulyono, Slamet Budi; Hermansyah, Erwin Owan; Widijowati, Rr. Dijan; Tumanggor, M. S.
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (Februari 2023)
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v3i2.1391

Abstract

Abstract: In order to increase investment in doing business, licensing barriers in the business world are addressed by the government by issuing Presidential Regulation number 91 of 2017 concerning the Acceleration of Business Implementation State Gazette Number 210 of 2017, where one of the objectives is to accelerate and facilitate services for businesses by applying the use of technology information through the Electronically Integrated Business Licensing System (Online Single Submission). However, this system still has its own polemics that occur, such as disharmony with laws and regulations and the absence of a transitional period, so that system development and outreach are carried out on an ongoing basis. This research was then examined using the normative-judicial method, which prioritized the use of secondary data obtained through library research. From the results of the discussion, the researcher came to the conclusion that the government has provided new concepts and breakthroughs regarding business licensing reform in the form of Online Single Submission, which is expected to be more pro-business in order to obtain certainty in the licensing process. In addition, not all business actors understand the flow of the process because this is not clearly described in PP Number 24 of 2018. Abstrak: Dalam rangka peningkatan penanaman modal/investasi dalam berusaha, hambatan perizinan dalam dunia usaha tersebut ditanggulangi pemerintah dengan mengeluarkan Peraturan Presiden nomor 91 Tahun 2017 tentang Percepatan Pelaksanaan Berusaha Lembaran Negara Nomor 210 Tahun 2017, dimana salah satu tujuannya adalah mempercepat dan mempermudah pelayanan untuk berusaha dengan menerapkan penggunaan teknologi informasi melalui Sistem Perizinan Berusaha Terintegrasi Secara Elektronik (Online Single Submission). Akan tetapi, sistem ini masih mempunyai polemik tersendiri yang terjadi, seperti disharmoni terhadap peraturan perundangan-undangan dan ketiadaan masa transisi atau peralihan, sehingga pengembangan sistem dan sosialisasi dilakukan sambil berjalan. Penelitian ini kemudian ditelaah menggunakan metode Yuridis Normatif yang mengutamakan penggunaan data sekunder yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan (library research). Dari hasil pembahasan, peneliti menemukan kesimpulan yaitu pemerintah telah memberikan konsep dan terobosan baru tentang reformasi perizinan berusaha berupa Online Single Submission yang diharap lebih memihak kepada para Pelaku Usaha agar mendapatkan kepastian dalam proses perizinan. Selain itu, pemahaman atas perizinan yang membutuhkan pemenuhan komitmen agar izin berlaku efektif tidak semua pelaku usaha memahami alur prosesnya, karena hal tersebut tidak tergambarkan secara jelas pada PP Nomor 24 Tahun 2018.
Justice collaborator status in murder based on Law Number 31 of 2014 Hakim, Luqmanul; Hermansyah, Erwin Owan; Sulastri, Lusia
Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science Vol. 3 No. 2 (2023): Indonesian Journal of Multidisciplinary Science
Publisher : International Journal Labs

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55324/ijoms.v3i2.716

Abstract

Provisions regarding Justice Collaborator are regulated in Law Number 31 of 2014 concerning the Protection of Witnesses and Victims. In practice, it is not uncommon for the role of Justice Collaborator to be applied inappropriately. For example, in the case of Bharada Richard Eliezer Pudihang Lumiu. This study aims  to examine and analyze the determination of justice collaborator according to Law Number 31 of 2014 and examine and analyze the ideal construction of determining the status of justice collaborator  for perpetrators of premeditated murder crimes. This study uses normative juridical research with secondary data in the form of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. The results showed that the determination of the status of justice collaborator in the Brigadier Joshua murder case by the defendant Ricard Eliezer the application for Justice Collaborator status should have been rejected by the panel of judges, where the crime of premeditated murder was not included in the category of cases that qualified as Justice Collaborator based on the provisions of Law Number 31 of 2014, but for the sake of disclosure of the case,  and in order to fulfill the responsibility of judges in carrying out their main duties and functions, to enforce the law optimally in order to fulfill a sense of justice, expediency and legal certainty. The Justice Collaborator system for premeditated murder perpetrators requires clearer, more detailed legal rules, as per the rule of law, legality, and certainty theories, compared to arrangements in America, Italy, and Hong Kong.