Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 7 Documents
Search

Urgensi Penjatuhan Denda sebagai Sanksi Administrasi Utama: Tinjauan Kasus Persekongkolan Tender dalam Persaingan Usaha Tidak Sehat Fionna Khantidevi Lukmadi; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1230

Abstract

The present-day dynamic development of the world economy is creating enormous changes in trade. The increasing developments and needs of the global market today for adequate facilities and infrastructure for economic activities has created many forms of unhealthy competition, one of which is bid rigging which is carried out to avoid competition between business actors. This tender collusion is widespread among large business actors who want to obtain partnerships with the government in providing infrastructure. Hence, Law Number 5 of 1999 Concerning Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices and Unfair Business Competition was formulated which regulates administratif penalty due to bid rigging. Seeing that the problem of tender collusion is still occurring, this research was conducted to identify fines as the main administratif sanction to prevent collusion in tender activities. Therefore, this article was prepared with the title "The Urgency of Imposing Fines as the Main Administratif Sanction: Review of Cases of Tender Rigging in Unfair Business Competition". The object of this research is fines as administratif penalty with the aim that if fines are determined as the main administratif sanction before the main crime, healthy business competition will be created. The normative judicial with literature study is a method that will be used in this research so that we can see how fines as administratif penalty apply in cases of bid rigging.
Analisis Perlindungan Hukum Atas Kerugian Investor Publik Akibat Praktik Insider Trading Berdasarkan Hukum Positif Indonesia Yosia Clementino Moningka; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1231

Abstract

This article is motivated by the rapid development of the world of capital markets in Indonesia, and it cannot be denied that one of the crimes occurring in the world of capital markets is the practice of insider trading. This research uses a normative juridical approach, namely a type of approach that examines or analyzes secondary data such as library materials or secondary data consisting of primary legal materials, secondary legal materials and tertiary legal materials. Regulations regarding the practice of insider trading already have a legal umbrella in Article 95 and Article 99 of Law Number 8 of 1995 concerning Capital Markets, but in fact the existence of a legal umbrella with these articles still creates unclear implementation and law enforcement regarding insider trading cases. happened in Indonesia. Situations like this then contribute to losses felt by other public investors. Therefore, this research will discuss legal protection arrangements and legal remedies for public investors who experience losses due to insider trading practices based on Indonesian positive law. This research uses a normative juridical method with the Statute Approach. Legal protection for public investors for losses resulting from insider trading practices is regulated as immaterial losses which can take legal action through litigation, namely civil lawsuits with the argument of unlawful acts, or non-litigation through the Alternative Institution for Financial Services Sector Dispute Resolution which is provided by OJK.
Telaah Pergeseran Paradigma Asas dan Prinsip Dalam Pendirian Perusahaan Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja: Tinjauan Konsep dan Penerapannya Terhadap Perusahaan Perorangan Jessica Fionita; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1344

Abstract

Establishing a single person limited company is a concept for establishing a company that emerged after the Job Creation Law was passed. Single person limited company allow a company to be established with only one person. This is of course regarding the debate regarding shifting the paradigm regarding the principles and concepts of responsibility that have been adhered to in the corporate legal regime. In this research, the author aims to examine the concept of establishment and responsibility for the formation of single person limited companies after the enactment of the Job Creation Law. This research is normative legal research using conceptual and statutory approaches. In fact, the paradigm shift from the concept of a capital partnership which can be established by a single shareholder is not something new because this has been explained in Article 7 paragraph (5) of the Limited Liability Company Law which states that a company can be established with only one shareholder entity such as an entity. State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN). Single person limited Companies that provide flexibility to shareholders to create a company that can be established by a single shareholder provided that it meets the existing criteria for Small and Medium Enterprises (UMK). The liability of this single person limited company remains the same as that of a Limited Liability Company which has liability limited to the shares owned by the shareholder as explained in article 153 J paragraph (2) of the Job Creation Law as long as there are no matters excluded in that article.
Pembatalan Pailit Yayasan Rumah Sakit Sandi Karsa (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1262 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2022) Tiffani Rimandita; Ariawan Gunadi
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1396

Abstract

Decision Number 1262 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2022 has sparked a discourse on the appropriateness of the Judges' Panel granting specificity to the Sandi Karsa Hospital Foundation to annul its bankruptcy declaration, as it operates in the management of hospitals. In essence, bankruptcy laws and PKPU (Penyelesaian Kepailitan dan PKPU) apply universally to all debtors, regardless of their business entity status operating in specific fields. The legal considerations of the judge state that creditors, in reality, intended to declare the debtor bankrupt without taking into account the debtor's proposed peace plan. This consideration becomes an interesting issue, as the acceptance or rejection of a debtor's proposed peace plan is the right of the creditor. The researcher will address the legal issues surrounding Decision Number 1262 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2022 using a normative juridical method. The author seeks answers to these legal issues based on norms, legal perspectives, or legislation. This legislative approach is employed by the researcher to examine legal regulations and other legal provisions related to insurance to address the issue. The application of specific bankruptcy conditions to the Sandi Karsa Hospital Foundation, as reviewed in Supreme Court Decision Number 1262 K/Pdt.Sus-Bankruptcy/2022, is deemed imprecise because the bankruptcy conditions under the Bankruptcy Law and PKPU apply generally and do not provide specificity to individuals or corporations, including legal entities and non-legal entities in liquidation. The voting rights of creditors during the discussion of a proposed peace plan are utilized with consideration for the principle of business continuity for the debtor. These voting rights are a realization of rational considerations and reflect the creditors' intentions toward the peace plan proposed by the debtor.
Reformation of Indonesian Insolvency Regulation on Execution of Cross-Border Assets Based on the European Union Evelyn Hartono; Ariawan Gunadi
Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia
Publisher : Syntax Corporation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36418/syntax-literate.v8i11.14100

Abstract

The current possibility of hassle-free negotiations and transactions across countries allows international trade to be a significant source of profit for businesses in Indonesia. In the process, businesses are often exposed to risks of insolvency for being unable to repay debts. An insolvent debtor owning assets in other countries shifts the case to a cross-border insolvency case. As there is currently an absence of cross-border insolvency regulation in Indonesia, this paper therefore aims to reform Indonesian insolvency regulation through analyzing and applying learning points from the European Union’s success in managing cross-border insolvency. This paper identifies as legal normative research and is done through prescriptive analysis. The data used is secondary data obtained through a literature review, which includes primary and secondary sources. This paper uses the statute approach and will be analyzed qualitatively. Through the discussion, it is suggested that Indonesia adopt several relevant aspects of the EU regulation. To ease implementation, Indonesia should consider moving towards the reformation as a part of ASEAN. Alternatively, Indonesia can also independently engage in bilateral or multilateral treaties. To add on, Indonesia should advance from the idea of absolute territorialism or absolute universalism and instead seek to implement modified universalism in its cross-border insolvency regulation.
Dampak Monopoli Jasa Pengiriman dalam E-commerce terhadap Hak Konsumen: Kajian Peran Lembaga Perlindungan Konsumen Vito Jonathan Octavo; Ariawan Gunadi
Ranah Research : Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Ranah Research : Journal Of Multidisciplinary Research and Development (Novembe
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/rrj.v7i1.1305

Abstract

Technological advances have driven major changes in various sectors, including the economy, through the digitalization of trade known as e-commerce. E-commerce introduces virtual interactions between producers and consumers, offering the convenience of efficient transactions. However, this phenomenon also raises new challenges, such as the potential for monopoly of delivery services that can harm consumers. This practice often limits consumers' rights to choose services such as delivery services according to their needs. This study aims to analyze the impact of monopoly of delivery services by e-commerce on consumer rights in Indonesia, as well as review the role of consumer protection institutions. Based on a normative approach with a prescriptive analysis method.
Perlindungan Hukum Well Known Mark dari Tindakan Passing Off: Upaya Menjaga Reputasi dan Hak Vivi Heniasy; Ariawan Gunadi
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i2.3275

Abstract

Perlindungan hukum terhadap merek terkenal (well-known mark) dari tindakan passing off menjadi isu krusial dalam era globalisasi dan persaingan bisnis yang semakin ketat. Tindakan passing off merujuk pada praktik menipu konsumen dengan cara menyamarkan produk atau layanan agar terlihat seolah-olah berasal dari merek terkenal, sehingga dapat merugikan pemilik merek dan mengganggu reputasi yang telah dibangun. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis upaya perlindungan hukum yang dapat diambil oleh pemilik merek terkenal dalam menghadapi tindakan passing off. Dengan menggunakan pendekatan yuridis normatif, studi ini mengeksplorasi berbagai instrumen hukum, baik dalam perundang-undangan hak atas kekayaan intelektual (HAKI) maupun hukum dagang, yang dapat digunakan untuk melindungi merek terkenal. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga membahas pentingnya kesadaran hukum bagi pelaku bisnis dalam menjaga reputasi dan hak mereka. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa perlindungan yang efektif terhadap merek terkenal memerlukan kolaborasi antara pemilik merek, pemerintah, dan masyarakat untuk menciptakan lingkungan bisnis yang adil dan berkelanjutan. Dengan demikian, langkah-langkah proaktif dalam mengatasi tindakan passing off tidak hanya melindungi hak pemilik merek, tetapi juga berkontribusi pada kesehatan pasar dan perlindungan konsumen.