Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Multidiciplinary Output Research for Actual and International Issue (Morfai Journal) Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal
Tiara Rachma Sari
Fakultas Hukum, UPN Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Tinjauan Etika Mengenai Kode Etik Profesi Hakim Dalam Menggunakan Media Sosial Tiara Rachma Sari; Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba
Madani: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol 1, No 11 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

With the rapid development of technology, it is now easier for people to communicate and find information, one of which is through social media. Social media has various types, advantages and disadvantages. The use of social media is not limited to a person's status, such as age, gender, religion or profession. Currently, many judges use social media to communicate, seek information and interact with the public. However, the use of social media by judges can affect public trust in the judiciary. In several countries, there are already rules and ways for judges to use social media properly and correctly. However, in Indonesia, the Code of Ethics and Code of Conduct for Judges (KEPPH) which has been in effect since 2009 does not regulate the use of social media by judges. Therefore, this research aims to assist the Supreme Court and the Judicial Commission in creating regulations or guidelines regarding the use of social media by judges, as well as assisting judges in using social media without violating the judge's professional code of ethics.
PUBLIC ACCESSIBILITY TO COURT DECISIONS RELATING TO CIVIL DISPUTES IN THE E-COURT SYSTEM Tiara Rachma Sari; Surahmad
Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue (MORFAI) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Multidiciplinary Output Research For Actual and International Issue
Publisher : RADJA PUBLIKA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/morfai.v5i2.3935

Abstract

This study examines the extent to which the public can access civil dispute decisions through the e-Court system as an implementation of the principle of open trials. Through a normative juridical approach to legal regulations and court decisions, it was found that although e-Court can accelerate and simplify judicial administration, public access to decisions remains unequal. Electronic copies of decisions are only provided to parties directly involved in the case, while the general public or third parties must still submit manual requests or wait for publication in the Supreme Court Decision Directory, which is often not updated quickly and comprehensively. Differences in implementation in each regional court also widen the gap in transparency. The results of this study indicate that the success of e-Court in supporting judicial transparency requires improvements to the publication system and standardization of procedures to ensure more secure and equitable public access to decisions.
Co-Authors Kayus Kayowuan Lewoleba Surahmad