Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

FIKIH BARU JAMAL AL-BANNA: KRITIK TERHADAP TERTUTUPNYA PINTU IJTIHAD Zainal Arifin; Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami; Noor Rizqiya Fimaulidina
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v9i2.9515

Abstract

 This research is motivated by the doctrine of the closed door of ijtihad. The implication is that around the 19th century figures emerged who constructively criticized this doctrine. The reason the researcher chose Jamal al-Banna was because he was one of the reformers of Islamic law who tried to reconstruct Islamic law with the paradigm of reason and freedom of authenticity (al-Bara'ah al-Ashliyyah). This article tries to examine further how the stagnation of critical doctrine carried out by Jamal al-Banna and how coercion resulted from this criticism. This article finds that there is a structuralist essence in Jamal al-Banna's critique of ijtihad. The door to Ijtihad is not closed as long as humans have reason. Therefore, reason is the initial foundation in efforts to formulate the fiqh Jadid which was initiated by Jamal al-Banna.   
FIKIH BARU JAMAL AL-BANNA: KRITIK TERHADAP TERTUTUPNYA PINTU IJTIHAD Zainal Arifin; Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami; Noor Rizqiya Fimaulidina
Jurnal AL-MAQASID: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan Vol 9, No 2 (2023)
Publisher : UIN Syekh Ali Hasan Ahmad Addary Padangsidimpuan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24952/almaqasid.v9i2.9515

Abstract

 This research is motivated by the doctrine of the closed door of ijtihad. The implication is that around the 19th century figures emerged who constructively criticized this doctrine. The reason the researcher chose Jamal al-Banna was because he was one of the reformers of Islamic law who tried to reconstruct Islamic law with the paradigm of reason and freedom of authenticity (al-Bara'ah al-Ashliyyah). This article tries to examine further how the stagnation of critical doctrine carried out by Jamal al-Banna and how coercion resulted from this criticism. This article finds that there is a structuralist essence in Jamal al-Banna's critique of ijtihad. The door to Ijtihad is not closed as long as humans have reason. Therefore, reason is the initial foundation in efforts to formulate the fiqh Jadid which was initiated by Jamal al-Banna.   
Women And Legislation: Ebb And Flow Of The Struggle To Establish Post-Reform Violence Elimination Policy Mohammad Fauzan Ni'ami; Mufidah Ch
Musãwa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025): Vol. 24 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2025.242.63-90

Abstract

Riset ini dilatarbelakangi oleh perjuangan perempuan dalam memperjuangan kebijakan penghapusan kekerasan terhadap perempuan di Indonesia pasca reformasi. Posisi perempuan di ruang publik memiliki daya tawar yang baik untuk memproduksi hukum nasional. Implikasinya adalah kehadiran Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2003 Tentang Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, Rancangan Undang-Undang Keadilan Dan Kesetaraan Gender, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual yang berupaya menjadi representasi dari kebijakan pro perempuan. Riset ini mencoba melacak geneologi munculnya kebijakan penghapusan kekerasan terhadap perempuan pasca reformasi dengan menghadirkan pergulatan yang melibatkan kaum perempuan. Dengan mengggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis normatif dan pendekatan genealogi (genealogycal approach) dan filosofi (philoshophy approach), kami berargumentasi bahwa terjadi pasang surut perjuangan perempuan. Faktor yang menjadi penyebab surutnya perjuangan perempuan dalam mengadvoaksi kebijakan tersebut adalah adanya politik patriarki. Sedangkan faktor yang menjadi pemicu lahirnya aktivitas perjuangan perempuan adalah hegemoni dengan tujuan mobilisasi massa supaya mendukung pengesahan Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2003 Tentang Kekerasan Dalam Rumah Tangga, Rancangan Undang-Undang Keadilan Dan Kesetaraan Gender, dan Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 Tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual. Kajian ini berimplikasi kepada pengembangan riset geneologi perjuangan perempuan dalam memproduksi hukum nasional.  Kata Kunci: Hegemoni, Kekerasan, Perempuan, Politik Patriarki. [This research is motivated by the struggle of women in fighting for policies to eliminate violence against women in post-reformation Indonesia. The position of women in the public sphere has good bargaining power to produce national laws. The implication is the presence of Law Number 23 of 2003 concerning Domestic Violence, the Draft Law on Justice and Gender Equality, and Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning the Crime of Sexual Violence which seeks to be a representation of pro-women policies. This research tries to trace the genealogy of the emergence of policies to eliminate violence against women after reform by presenting struggles involving women. By using normative juridical research and genealogical and philosophical approaches, we argue that there are ups and downs in women's struggles. The factor causing the decline in women's struggle in advocating for these policies is the existence of patriarchal politics. Meanwhile, the factor that triggered the birth of women's struggle activities was hegemony with the aim of mass mobilization to support the ratification of Law Number 23 of 2003 concerning Domestic Violence, the Draft Law on Justice and Gender Equality, and Law Number 12 of 2022 concerning Actions. Criminal Sexual Violence. This study has implications for the development of research on the genealogy of women's struggles in producing national laws. Keyword: Hegemony, Violence, Women, Patriarchal Politics.]