Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia
Aprilian Sumodiningrat
Unknown Affiliation
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekonstruksi Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemilu dan Paradigma Hakim dalam Putusan MK Nomor 2/PHPU.PRES-XXII/2024 Aprilian Sumodiningrat
Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 5 SEPTEMBER 2024
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Islam Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Disputes over General Election Results (hereinafter abbreviated as PHPU) are dispute resolutions in the Constitutional Court based on the authority regulated in Law Number 7 of 2017 concerning Elections and Law Number 24 of 2003 concerning the Constitutional Court. There are fundamental problems in PHPU Presidential Elections regarding the resolution of violations that are structured, systematic, and massive. This study has conclusions, namely: First, the majority of judges have a fairly moderate view in viewing the position of the Constitutional Court to examine and prosecute violations of a TSM nature. However, all three constitutional judges have a dissenting opinion that uses the original intent method of interpretation in interpreting the authority. Second, there needs to be an expansion of the meaning of structured, systematic, and massive violations, and regarding time limits in PHPU in the Constitutional Court to produce substantive justice.
Co-Authors Azuan Helmi Tb Rifat