Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
0.444
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research
Nuniek Herdyastuti
State University of Surabaya, Surabaya
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Other

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Analysis of the Science Literacy Profile of Students at State Junior High School Sintha Eka Ashari; Fida Rachmadiarti; Nuniek Herdyastuti
IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research Vol. 4 No. 6 (2023): November
Publisher : Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46245/ijorer.v4i6.340

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to determine the achievement of scientific literacy skills of junior high school students in the competency aspect. The competency aspects measured in this study are the competence to explain scientific phenomena, interpret data and scientific evidence, and evaluate and design. Methods: The research was conducted using the test method. The data was collected using a competency aspect scientific literacy test using a multiple choice test of 20 items on the scientific literacy test. The sampling technique used stratified random sampling, amounting to 67 students. Data analysis techniques using quantitative descriptive. Results: Based on the research conducted by the results of data analysis, it was found that the scientific literacy aspect of students' competence was included in the low category, with an overall average of 55.15%. The aspects of scientific literacy competency measured in this study are explaining scientific phenomena, interpreting data and scientific evidence, and evaluating and designing. The results of each scientific literacy competency indicator are as follows: (1) students' ability to explain scientific phenomena, the average percentage only reaches the deficient category; (2) students' ability to interpret data and scientific evidence in the deficient category and (3) students' ability to evaluate and design in the deficient category. Novelty: This study reveals an urgent need to develop appropriate innovations, methods, and designs to improve students' science literacy, especially the learning models used. These findings encourage teachers to improve learning continuously.
Development of Chemistry Lecture Sets for Reducing Logical Fallacy in Arguing Ilham Pradana Putra Harahap; Suyono Suyono; Nuniek Herdyastuti; Sukarmin Sukarmin
IJORER : International Journal of Recent Educational Research Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): March
Publisher : Faculty of Teacher Training and Education Muhammadiyah University of Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46245/ijorer.v5i2.379

Abstract

Objective: This study aims to develop a lecture set designed to reduce the occurrence of logical fallacies by training students' argumentation skills. Method: The lecture sets were developed to refer to the stages of the ADDIE development model (Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation). Validity was validated by three validators on student activity sheets and argumentative ability assessment sheets. The validity of the test results was obtained based on the mode of calculation and the percentage of agreement between validators. Results: The lecture sets are structured by containing six types of logical fallacies, namely relative privation, blind authority fallacy, hasty generalization, questionable cause fallacy, reification fallacy, and non sequitur, and includes general chemistry lecture material, namely stoichiometry, atomic structure, periodicity of elements, chemical bonds, the concentration of the solution, the equilibrium of ions in the solution, and the colligative properties of the solution. The chemistry lecture sets for reducing logical fallacies in arguing has been declared valid by the validator. Novelty: The results of this study can be used as a reference by teachers, lecturers, or other researchers who wish to study more about logical fallacies.
Co-Authors Fida Rachmadiarti Ilham Pradana Putra Harahap Sintha Eka Ashari Sukarmin Sukarmin Suyono Suyono