YANTI ANASTASYA MABUKA
Universitas Pasifik Morotai

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menulis Karangan Deskripsi dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran Student Facilitator and Exsplaining pada Kelas IV SD Inpres Raja Kecamatan Morotai Selatan Barat M. Rais Salim; Yanti Anastasya Mabuka
Jurnal Pasifik Pendidikan Vol. 1 No. 2 (2022): June
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pasifik Morotai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The research with the title of improving students' writing skills using the Student Facilitator And Explaining learning model in the fourth grade of SD Inpres Raja, South West Morotai District. This classroom action research was conducted on 17 students consisting of 9 boys and 8 girls, the research was conducted in two cycles. From the results of the research in the first cycle by following the stages of classroom action research (planning, implementing, observing and reflecting), the researchers got results that were not maximized, where the level of teacher activity in the first cycle was 57.5%, this resulted in poor learning outcomes. have not reached the classical completeness standard (80%) because of the 17 students who achieved the minimum completeness standard (KKM), 5 students (29.47%) and 12 students (70.53%) did not succeed. Judging from the first cycle, then in the second cycle, researchers made improvements to teaching methods so as to obtain maximum results. Thus the results of the research in cycle II according to the observer, the teacher was maximal in terms of implementing the Student Facilitator And Explaining learning model, where the teacher's activity in the second cycle was 90%, because the teacher's activity was maximized, the learning outcomes in the second cycle had reached the KKM standard. classic (80%). Of the 17 students who succeeded, namely 14 students (82.12%) and 3 students (17.88%), it can be concluded that the research in the second cycle has been successful, and there is no need to carry out further research in the next cycle. Meanwhile, 3 students who have not succeeded are only given remedial.