Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

Keabsahan Hukum Jual Beli dalam Game Online yang Dilarang oleh End User License Agreement (EULA) Ismaidar Ismaidar; Hizkia Sitompul; Setiawan Jodi Sitorus; Yeni Gustina; Yaspis Abigait Ginting; Eka Agustina
Journal of Innovative and Creativity Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pahlawan Tuanku Tambusai

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31004/joecy.v5i3.6120

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis secara normatif praktik Real Money Trading (RMT), yang secara eksplisit dilarang oleh End User License Agreement (EULA) untuk menjual dan membeli akun game dan item virtual secara online. Di era digital, industri game online telah berkembang menjadi ekosistem ekonomi yang besar, tetapi masih ada masalah hukum tentang status kepemilikan aset virtual. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk melihat bagaimana hukum Indonesia mengatur transaksi RMT yang dilakukan pemain melalui mekanisme backdoor dan perlindungan hukum yang diberikan kepada para pihak yang ditinjau. Penelitian ini menggunakan yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Bahan hukum primer dan sekunder seperti UU Perlindungan Konsumen, UU ITE, dan KUHPerdata digunakan. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa EULA adalah kontrak resmi yang mengikat pemain yang sah, di mana pemain hanya memiliki lisensi terbatas atau hak pakai berupa aset virtual yang dianggap sebagai hak milik dan hak cipta pengembang. Akibatnya, transaksi RMT batal secara hukum karena melanggar syarat objektif sahnya perjanjian, yaitu ‘sebab yang halal’, dan melanggar hak pengembang. Dalam transaksi ilegal ini, perlindungan hukum konsumen menjadi lemah dan pengembang memiliki kebebasan penuh untuk menjatuhkan sanksi, seperti pemblokiran akun tanpa kompensasi. Penelitian ini membantu memberikan kepastian hukum tentang status aset virtual dan menekankan betapa pentingnya rekonstruksi undang-undang yang mengakomodasi perubahan ekonomi digital yang terjadi dalam industri game.
Constitutional Protection of Gig workers' Right to Occupational Safety: Analysis of Legal Vacuum and State Obligations in the Digital Economy Era Dibi Vation Manik; Tamaulina Br. Sembiring; Ismaidar Ismaidar
Journal of Research in Social Science and Humanities Vol 5, No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Utan Kayu Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47679/jrssh.v5i4.599

Abstract

Development rapidly Indonesia's digital economy has cause increasing amount Gig workers facing risk significant related health and safety work . Ambiguity specific laws and regulations has create a situation where Gig workers are mostly big No protected . Analysis normative This investigate right constitutional related safety Work for Gig workers , evaluating mismatch between directions constitutional and action existing regulations , as well as provide solution suggestions relevant laws with gig economy . Descriptive-analytical techniques qualitative used , with refers to the material primary, secondary , and tertiary laws . Research results show that right on decent living and shelter in place Work in accordance with The 1945 Constitution has not fully implemented for Gig workers . Challenges systemic — such as ambiguous legal status , inadequate oversight adequate , and laws rigid employment — hinders implementation effective protection . Research This emphasize importance revise policy employment to be more inclusive , developing system guarantee flexible social , and create steps enforcement solid law For fulfil not quite enough answer constitutional state. In special study This highlight that change laws and policies innovation is very important For protect rights Gig workers and ensure environment safe and dignified work in Indonesia's digital economy
Problems of the elimination of criminal sanctions in law number 2 of 2017 concerning construction services: A study of policies and legal protection of construction accident victims Ismaidar Ismaidar; Bambang Fitrianto; Haris Habibi; Sagita Purnomo; Enda Leginta Barus; Bima Lumbanbatu
Priviet Social Sciences Journal Vol. 5 No. 11 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Privietlab

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55942/pssj.v5i11.918

Abstract

The abolition of criminal sanctions in Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Construction Services creates a vacuum and uncertainty in law enforcement. Previously, in cases of construction failures and accidents that caused injuries and deaths, the perpetrators could be charged with Article 43 of Law Number 18 of 1999 concerning Construction Services, but with the removal of this criminal provision, law enforcement was carried out using the Criminal Code and/or building law. This condition results in disparities in the law enforcement. This research aims to discuss the void of criminal law in Law Number 2 of 2017 concerning Construction Services and comprehensively examine policies and legal protection for construction accident victims. The type of research used is normative juridical with a descriptive-analytical approach, discussing existing legal symptoms and problems and testing them based on applicable laws and regulations. The results of this study show that the void in criminal law in construction services law occurs due to the elimination of criminal sanctions based on legal political factors; thus, law enforcement for construction accidents cannot be carried out using special laws on construction services. Legal protection for victims of construction accidents is emphasized in law enforcement to provide a deterrent effect against perpetrators, consisting of the application of strict sanctions, compensation for victims, and the implementation of occupational health and safety management standards.