Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.23
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal As-Syar'i : Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Yanto Yanto
Universitas Jayabaya
Religion Education Social Sciences Other

Published : 1 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search

 1 
Rekontruksi Penggunaan Teori Positivisme Hukum dalam Penegakan Tindak Pidana Korupsi di Indonesia Riki Kristianto; Mardi Candra; Yanto Yanto
As-Syar'i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Vol 6 No 1 (2024): As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah IAIN Laa Roiba Bogor

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47467/as.v6i1.5838

Abstract

The freedom of judges in handing down sentences for criminal acts of corruption often creates legal uncertainty. Judges are given the freedom to assess sentences in corruption cases based on punishment theory and happiness theory. Very often the imposition of sentences actually causes injustice because of the leniency given by the judge. Positivism basically comes from a philosophical school that borrows the views, methods and techniques of Natural Science in understanding reality (scientism). So, as a result, legal science is freed from hermeneutics and is required to follow the rules in order to achieve legal certainty. Therefore, this article tries to answer how to reconstruct the use of legal positivism theory in enforcing criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia. This research is a qualitative type of normative juridical research with secondary data from decision No.34/Pid.Sus-Tpk/2021/PN.Jkt.Pst. Based on the research results, it shows that the positivist thinking pattern should be used as a guide for judges as law enforcers in prosecuting criminal acts of corruption, so that criminal acts of corruption in Indonesia no longer receive leniency and provide legal certainty
Co-Authors Candra, Mardi Riki Kristianto