Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
0.751
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum
m-adi setiawan
Muhammadiyah University Yogyakarta
Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice

Published : 2 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

 1 
Justice Collaborator Implementation with Law Effectively Approaches in Indonesia m-adi setiawan; Yeni Widowaty
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.3714

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penerapan justice collaborator dengan pendekatan efektivitas hukum di Indonesia. Selain itu pasal ini menggunakan metode normatif dengan sumber data pustaka dan dokumen hukum peraturan terkait. Temuan dalam penelitian ini adalah justice collaborator pernah mengalami permasalahan mengenai perlindungan hukum terhadap justice collaborator dan penetapan justice collaborator. Justice Collaborator mempunyai banyak kelemahan dalam sistem hukum, dan penetapan justice collaborator, dan banyak ahli berpendapat bahwa undang-undang tentang justice collaborator dan penetapan justice collaborator perlu menciptakan aturan-aturan baru yang dapat menjangkau ranahnya untuk mencapai efektivitas, sehingga keadilan harus ada. dilakukan. Para kolaborator harus memiliki domain hukum yang jelas dalam hal penetapan, perlindungan, dan fasilitas lainnya, dimana peran justice collaborator adalah membantu aparat penegak hukum mengusut pelaku utama kasus korupsi yang mana para justice collaborator akan mendapat ancaman yang membahayakan nyawanya.
Efficiency of Justice Collaborator Witnesses with Crown Witnesses in Revealing Corruption Criminal Cases m-adi setiawan; Yeni Widowati
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 22 No. 001 (2023): Pena Justisia (Special Issue)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research aims to determine the justice collaborator and crown witnesses' efficiency in uncovering criminal corruption cases. Furthermore, this article uses normative methods, library data sources, and relevant regulatory legal documents. The findings in this research are that using crown witnesses in the judicial process is common, but this condition does not mean that the public prosecutor can present crown witnesses in court. The use of crown witnesses with a mechanism (splitting) in the evidentiary process in court is contrary to the principle of non-self-discrimination, which is implicitly partially reflected in several articles, namely Article 66 of the Criminal Procedure Code, which states that there is no burden of proof for the defendant (the burden of proof is the responsibility of the public prosecutor). Crown witnesses are also an essential tool in fighting organized crime in cases of criminal acts of corruption. As an insider who is part of the environment where the information he leaked, he understands very well what and how the crime method is, which has been neatly wrapped up and kept secret from the public and law enforcement.
Co-Authors Yeni Widowati Yeni Widowaty