Putra Hutomo
Universitas Jayabaya, Jakarta, Indonesia

Published : 3 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search

PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEMBELI ATAS TANAH YANG TELAH DITANDATANGANI PERJANJIAN PENGIKATAN JUAL BELI (PPJB) DAN DIJUAL KEMBALI OLEH DEVELOPER Arrahman Hijratul Islami Tobing; Putra Hutomo; Furcony Putri
JOURNAL OF LAW AND NATION Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Law and Nation
Publisher : INTELIGENSIA MEDIA

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

PPJB is made as a preliminary agreement made by the seller and buyer in the sale and purchase of land rights because there are conditions that have not been fulfilled by one of the parties, so the sale and purchase before the PPAT cannot be carried out, so the prospective buyer seller first makes a PPJB before a Notary as a Public Official. The problem formulations in this research are: 1) What is the legal effect of the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement on land acquired by the buyer and resold by the developer?; 2). How is the legal protection of the buyer of the land based on the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement (PPJB) of the land that has been paid in full and resold by the developer? By using the theory of legal protection according to Satjipto Rahardjo and the theory of legal consequences according to R. Soeroso, it can be concluded that the legal consequences of the Sale and Purchase Binding Agreement on the land obtained by the buyer and resold by the developer are very detrimental to the buyer who has done the PPJB before, and as promised can be said to have broken the promise (default) as stipulated in Article 1238 of the Civil Code.2) The legal protection obtained by the parties in terms of the transfer of land rights in the sale and purchase binding agreement is very strong because the proof of the sale and purchase binding agreement is made before an authorized public official in this case is a Notary, by signing the deed in front of a Notary or PPAT and then explaining its contents to the parties who make a sale and purchase binding agreement then signing before a Notary, the deed has valid and strong evidence as other authentic deeds.
Ownership Of Flat Units For Foreigners In The Agrarian Legal Order Putra Hutomo; H. Yuhelson; Mohamad - Ismed
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4144

Abstract

The aim of the research is to describe apartment units associated with investment in the property sector for ownership of apartment units for foreign citizens in Indonesia by paying attention to land rights in Indonesia, so that there is no disharmony with positive law in Indonesia. The research method uses a normative juridical legal research type. The approaches used include the statutory approach, conceptual approach, analytical approach. An analytical approach is carried out by analyzing legal material to find out what is contained in the terms used in a legal regulation conceptually, as well as understanding the regulation in practice. The results of the research are that in the UUPA there are several types of land rights, namely: (1) Ownership rights; (2) Cultivation rights; (3) Building use rights; (4) Use rights; (5) Rental rights; (6) The right to open land; (7) The right to collect forest products; (8) Other rights which are not included in the rights mentioned above will be determined by law as well as temporary rights as stated in Article 53 of the UUPA. After the enactment of Law 11/2020, the regulation of ownership of condominium units for foreigners is specifically regulated in Part Four of Land Paragraph 3 Condominium Units for Foreigners, as intended in the provisions of Articles 143 to 145. In its development to implement Constitutional Court Decision Number 91/PUU-XVIIl2020, improvements need to be made by replacing Law Number 11 of 2020 concerning Job Creation (Letter f, Considering section, Law Number 6 of 2023), as promulgated in Law Number 6 of 2023 concerning Determination of Regulations The Government Substitutes Law Number 2 of 2022 concerning Job Creation into Law (hereinafter referred to as Law 6/2023)
Perlindungan Hukum Personal Guarantor dalam Kepailitan Debitor Utama Putra Hutomo
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis kedudukan dan perlindungan hukum penanggung (personal guarantor) setelah Debitor utama dinyatakan pailit menurut hukum Indonesia. Analisis membedakan sifat aksesoir dan subsidair penanggungan, pengecualian terhadap hak mendahulukan eksekusi berdasarkan Pasal 1831–1832 KUHPerdata, khususnya Pasal 1832 angka 4 ketika Debitor utama berada dalam keadaan pailit, serta kemungkinan penanggung berkualifikasi sebagai “Debitor” untuk tujuan kepailitan. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Putusan dipilih karena secara eksplisit berkaitan dengan personal guarantee serta menunjukkan hasil yudisial yang berbeda atau dasar fakta yang secara material tidak sama. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pailitnya Debitor utama menghilangkan hak penanggung untuk menuntut agar harta Debitor utama dieksekusi lebih dahulu berdasarkan Pasal 1832 angka 4, tanpa mensyaratkan adanya pelepasan hak secara kontraktual. Konsekuensi tersebut tidak otomatis mengubah setiap penanggungan menjadi kewajiban independen dan tidak menghapus batas jaminan, tangkisan, hak regres, maupun subrogasi. Penanggung dapat berkualifikasi sebagai Debitor dalam hukum kepailitan hanya apabila kewajiban pembayarannya sendiri telah jatuh waktu dan dapat ditagih serta syarat kepailitan terbukti. Penelitian menawarkan model perlindungan tiga tahap yang meliputi pembentukan, penegakan, dan pascapembayaran, dengan pemisahan tegas antara hukum positif dan usulan pengujian proporsionalitas serta insolvency test sebagai pembaruan hukum.