Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.347
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya WAJAH HUKUM Unes Law Review Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP)
Hening Hapsari Setyorini
Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
Education Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences

Published : 6 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search

 1 
Kedudukan Harta Bersama dalam Perkawinan Campuran Antara Warga Negara Indonesia dan Warga Negara Asing Annisa Pebrina Harahap; Hening Hapsari Setyorini
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023): UNES LAW REVIEW (Desember 2023)
Publisher : LPPM Universitas Ekasakti Padang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1440

Abstract

Marriage is a form of cooperation between a man and a woman in society under special regulations and this is taken into account by religion, state, and custom. In general, marriage is a process of uniting two different individuals into a husband and wife with the aim of building a household and strengthening brotherhood between families. Marriage not only concerns the individual of husband and wife but also concerns all family and community matters. The definition of marriage based on the provisions of Article 1 of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage states that "Marriage is an inner and outer bond between a man and a woman as husband and wife with the aim of forming a happy and eternal family or household based on the belief in the Almighty God." Marriages can be carried out with different nationalities which are called mixed marriages. Article 57 Law no. 1 of 1974 Mixed Marriage is a marriage between two people who in Indonesia are subject to different laws, due to differences in nationality. The consequences of mixed marriages can have an impact on the status of children and marital assets because each country has its policies regarding mixed marriages and citizenship. In addition to containing matters related to marriage, the Marriage Law regulates marital property. This field is one of the areas of civil law with a sensitive nature and the potential to cause conflict because regulating this field is not as easy as regulating neutral legal fields. The complexity of problems in the area of ​​wealth resulting from mixed marriages, apart from being based on the Marriage Law No. 1 of 1974, also deals with the principles of International Private Law.
KONSEP KEBEBASAN DALAM NORMATIVE JURISPRUDENCE: ANALISIS HUBUNGAN ANTARA KEBEBASAN HUKUM, MORALITAS, DAN IMPLIKASINYA DALAM KEBEBASAN BERKONTRAK Setyorini, Hening Hapsari
Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol 12 No 8 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2024.v12.i08.p19

Abstract

Tujuan penulisan ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana konsep kebebasan dalam normative jurisprudence mempengaruhi kebebasan hukum, moralitas, serta implikasi dalam kebebasan berkontrak. Metode yang digunakan dalam penulisan ini adalah yuridis normative, guna meninjau bagaimana suatu issue hukum diselaraskan dengan hukum positif yang berlaku. Bahwa hasil dari ini ditemukan bahwa asas kebebasan berkontrak yang melekat pada naturjlik person pada hakikatnya akan selalu terikat pada moralitas dan nilai-nilai yang dihormati. Sehingga asas kebebasan berkontrak pada dasarnya tidak dapat diterapkan dengan utuh, sehingga penting untuk memahami keterkaitan kebebasan dalam normative jurisprudence. The purpose of this paper is to find out how the concept of freedom in normative jurisprudence affects legal freedom, morality, and implications in freedom of contract. The method used in this writing is normative jurisprudence, to review how a legal issue is harmonized with the applicable positive law. It is found that the principle of freedom of contract attached to the naturjlik person will essentially always be bound by morality and respected values. So that the principle of freedom of contract basically cannot be applied completely, so it is important to understand the relationship of freedom in normative jurisprudence.
Analisis Yuridis Pasal 39 Ayat 2 UU Perkawinan tentang Pelaksanaan Perceraian diluar Persetujuan Satu Pihak Pasangan Ariba Birkah; Hening Hapsari Setyorini
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v5i1.3128

Abstract

Penelitian ini menganalisis secara yuridis Pasal 39 Ayat 2 UU No. 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkawinan yang mengatur pelaksanaan perceraian tanpa persetujuan satu pihak pasangan. Pasal ini memungkinkan pengadilan mengabulkan perceraian meskipun salah satu pihak tidak setuju, asalkan ada alasan yang sah dan sesuai dengan peraturan hukum. Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk memahami implikasi hukum dari ketentuan tersebut, termasuk dampaknya terhadap keadilan dan hak-hak pasangan yang terlibat dalam proses perceraian. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, dengan menganalisis peraturan perundang-undangan dan studi kasus terkait. Penelitian ini juga membandingkan penerapan hukum dalam putusan pengadilan untuk mengevaluasi keadilan dalam perceraian yang diajukan sepihak. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketentuan Pasal 39 Ayat 2 memberi fleksibilitas bagi pihak yang mengalami masalah dalam perkawinan untuk mengajukan perceraian, namun dalam beberapa kasus dapat menimbulkan ketidakadilan bagi pihak yang tidak setuju. Oleh karena itu, pengadilan harus secara hati-hati mempertimbangkan hak dan kepentingan kedua belah pihak, terutama dalam kasus yang melibatkan perempuan dan anak, untuk menjaga keseimbangan antara kebebasan individu dan perlindungan hukum.
Implikasi Kekeliruan Substansi Permohonan Penetapan Pengadilan terhadap Kedudukan Hukum Anak Luar Kawin Rachmadhiva, Affra Sabilla; Setyorini, Hening Hapsari
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i1.1708

Abstract

This study analyzes the implications of substantive errors in court petitions regarding the recognition and legitimization of extramarital children, focusing on enhancing their legal status following the death of the biological father. Based on a case study of Pontianak District Court Determination No. 246/Pdt.P/2021/PN Ptk, it was found that inaccuracies in the substance of the petition can result in ambiguous legal determinations, particularly regarding the child’s status as a recognized but not fully legitimate child. This ambiguity impacts the civil rights of extramarital children, including inheritance rights from their biological father. This research employs doctrinal legal methodology with a descriptive-analytical approach through a literature review, aiming to comprehensively explain the court’s essential role in ensuring the completeness of petition substance from the initial stages, especially at Meja I (Desk I). The findings emphasize the importance of legitimizing extramarital children to secure a stronger legal status equivalent to legitimate children, ensuring the protection of civil rights and reducing the potential for future legal conflicts.
Urgensi Pencabutan Hak Asuh Anak dalam Kasus Kekerasan terhadap Anak di Indonesia Fauziyah, Diana; Setyorini, Hening Hapsari
Wajah Hukum Vol 9, No 1 (2025): April
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v9i1.1727

Abstract

Child Custody can be given to a parent in accordance with the best interest of the child. In reality, many parents who hold child custody do not do their responsibility in caring for and protecting their child well. This reality leads to many child abuse cases and even the death of the child. This research aims to examine should the child custody is revoked in some cases discussed in this research and how the parent who does not hold child custody can supervise child custody. This research was conducted using doctrinal research method which used the secondary data as a primary data to answer the problem. The answer of the problem is that the revocation of child custody is needed if the parent who holds child custody do not fulfill responsibility to her or his child as regulated in Article 49 of The Marriage Law. The parent who does not hold child custody can supervise child custody with visitation right. Unfortunately, there is no explicit regulation regarding this right.
Significance of Spousal Consent in a Loan Agreement as The Enforcement of Joint Asset Provisio Anne Guntari, Tifauni; Setyorini, Hening Hapsari
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 1 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i1.4222

Abstract

Joint asset causes legal consequences in entering into a loan agreement and its accessor, collateral agreement. These legal consequences shall arise as spousal consent is necessary in entering into such agreement. However, many collateral agreements are arranged without a spousal consent. The purpose of this writing to find out the legal consequences of collateral agreements which are entered into only by one of the parties, husband or wife, over the joint assets and responsibility(s) of the Notary Public and Land Deed Official Certifier (“Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah/ PPAT”) regarding the agreement. This study utilizes normative juridical approach which was carried out by examining data from legal norms in the society, including laws and regulations. Based on its characteristic, this research is a descriptive study. The result of this study is agreement remains binding on the joint asset despite the collateral agreement being entered into without spousal consent. Meanwhile, the responsibility of the Notary Public and PPAT if they are proven to neglect their obligation is considered unlawfulacts.
Co-Authors Anne Guntari, Tifauni Annisa Pebrina Harahap Ariba Birkah Fauziyah, Diana Rachmadhiva, Affra Sabilla Tifauni Anne Guntari