Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search

Bahasa Inggris Ika Uswatun Hasanah; Maria Ulfa; Sri Yamtinah; Mohammad Masykuri; Bakti Mulyani; Ari Syahidul Shidiq
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 11 (2023): November
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i11.4628

Abstract

The purpose of this experiment was to determine whether or not there were differences in the learning model between Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL), Problem Based Learning (PBL), and Teacher-Centered Learning (TCL) with the application of HOTS questions in their learning on students' critical thinking skills. This study used a quasi-experimental research design with the static group pretest-posttest design. The sampling technique used the cluster random sampling technique. The population of this research is the students of class XI MIPA SMA Negeri Gondangrejo in the academic year 2021/2022. The results showed that there were differences in students' critical thinking skills in the POGIL and PBL learning models with conventional learning, all three of which used the application of HOTS questions in their learning. This is based on the significant value of the One-Way ANOVA test, a significance value of <0.05 is obtained, which is 0.000, which means that H0 was rejected. Then, based on the calculation of the N-gain score for each POGIL, PBL, and TCL learning model, the results obtained are 0.71 in the high category; 0.54 in the medium category; and 0.39 in the medium category. However, based on the results of the Post Hoc-Scheefe test between the POGIL and PBL learning models, a significance value of > 0.05 was obtained, which was 0.098, so it could be concluded that there was no significant difference between the POGIL and PBL learning models on critical thinking skills. Therefore, both POGIL and PBL learning models can help improve students' critical thinking skills. The average critical thinking ability in the POGIL experimental class, PBL experimental class, and control class after treatment was 69.44%, 68.54%, and 59.72%.
Bahasa Inggris Hafid Al Afif; Maria Ulfa; Sri Yamtinah; Mohammad Masykuri; Bakti Mulyani; Ari Syahidul Shidiq
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 7 (2025): July
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i7.4314

Abstract

The study conducted at SMA N Karangpandan aimed to assess the literacy abilities of class X students using the AKM instrument based on chemical science. The research employed a descriptive qualitative method with purposive sampling, involving 137 students from various class X groups. Data was collected through tests and interviews. The findings revealed that 5% of students required special intervention, 17% were in the basic literacy category, 31% demonstrated proficient literacy, and 47% exhibited advanced literacy. Those needing intervention could retrieve explicit information but struggled with proper interpretations. Students with basic literacy could find and interpret explicit information effectively, while proficient students could handle implicit information and integrate portions of it. Advanced students demonstrated the ability to integrate, evaluate, and reflect upon text. The utilization of the AKM instrument aimed to familiarize class X students with AKM questions, helping them comprehend question forms, content, and context. The study's outcomes serve as an indicator of class X students' readiness for AKM assessments, offering insights into their literacy levels and providing a basis for further educational strategies.